The Quantity of Capital and the Rate of Interest: II
1936; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 44; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/254975
ISSN1537-534X
Autores Tópico(s)Political Economy and Marxism
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessThe Quantity of Capital and the Rate of Interest: IIFrank H. KnightFrank H. KnightPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 44, Number 5Oct., 1936 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/254975 Views: 6Total views on this site Citations: 15Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Ross B Emmett The writing and reception of Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Cambridge Journal of Economics 45, no.55 (Apr 2021): 883–900.https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beab005B Callegari The case for a unified monetary theory of interest: Keynes and Schumpeter, Cambridge Journal of Economics 45, no.11 (Sep 2020): 19–36.https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaa042Ross B. Emmett James M. Buchanan and Frank H. Knight on democracy as "government by discussion", Public Choice 183, no.3-43-4 (May 2020): 303–314.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-020-00815-4Ross B. Emmett The Writing and Reception of Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3591596Jiang Wang Finance (New Developments), (Feb 2018): 4601–4633.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2012Pavel Potuzak The Austrian Theory of Capital: An Attempt at Clarification, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2871147Jiang Wang Finance (New Developments), (Dec 2016): 1–33.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2012-1Stéphane Longuet Hayek et Knight (1933-1936). La controverse sur le capital, Cahiers d'économie Politique n° 51, no.22 (Sep 2006): 177–195.https://doi.org/10.3917/cep.051.0177Malte Faber, Ralph Winkler Heterogeneity and Time., American Journal of Economics and Sociology 65, no.33 (Jul 2006): 803–825.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2006.00475.xAvi J. Cohen The Kaldor/Knight controversy: Is capital a distinct and quantifiable factor of production?, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13, no.11 (Aug 2006): 141–161.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560500522801Nimai Mehta Frank Knight and the Productivity of Capital: Another Piece of the Puzzle, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25, no.44 (Jun 2009): 487–503.https://doi.org/10.1080/1042771032000147524Avi Cohen Frank Knight'ÄôS Position on Capital and Interest, (Dec 2009).https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203435991.ch10Ferdinando Meacci Irving Fisher and the Classics on the Notion of Capital: Upheaval and Continuity in Economic Thought, History of Political Economy 21, no.33 (Sep 1989): 409–424.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-21-3-409Wilfredo Santiago Valiente Is Frank Knight the Victor in the Controversy Between the two Cambridges?, History of Political Economy 12, no.11 (Mar 1980): 41–64.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-12-1-41 13. After the General Theory, History of Political Economy 8, no.11 (Mar 1976): 138–143.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-8-1-138
Referência(s)