Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fenoxycarb
2010; Wiley; Volume: 8; Issue: 12 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1779
ISSN1831-4732
Tópico(s)Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
ResumoEFSA JournalVolume 8, Issue 12 1779 Conclusion on PesticideOpen Access Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fenoxycarb European Food Safety Authority, European Food Safety AuthoritySearch for more papers by this author European Food Safety Authority, European Food Safety AuthoritySearch for more papers by this author First published: 14 December 2010 https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1779Citations: 3 Correspondence: [email protected] Published date: 14 December 2010 Question number: EFSA-Q-2010-00136 On request from: European Commission AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References Netherlands, 2007. Draft Assessment Report (DAR) on the active substance fenoxycarb prepared by the rapporteur Member State the Netherlands in the framework of Directive 91/414/EEC, June 2007. Netherlands, 2009. Additional Report to the Draft Assessment Report on the active substance fenoxycarb prepared by the rapporteur Member State the Netherlands in the framework of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, December 2009. Netherlands, 2010. Final Addendum to the Additional Report on fenoxycarb, compiled by EFSA, August 2010. Guidance documents European Commission, 2003. Guidance document on assessment of the relevance of metabolites in groundwater of substances regulated under council directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/221/2000-rev 10-final, 25 February 2003. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant protection products and their Residues (PPR) on the Science behind the Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for birds and mammals (EFSA journal 2008 734: 1– 181). FOCUS (2001). “FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2. 245 pp. FOCUS (2007). “Landscape And Mitigation Factors In Aquatic Risk Assessment. Volume 1. Extended Summary and Recommendations”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Landscape and Mitigation Factors in Ecological Risk Assessment, EC Document Reference SANCO/10422/2005 v2.0. 169 pp. FOCUS (2000). “FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances”. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000-rev.2. 202 pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002. EFSA (2007). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA related to the default Q10 value used to describe the temperature effect on transformation rates of pesticides in soil. The EFSA Journal (2007) 622, 1– 32. EFSA (2004). Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request of EFSA related to FOCUS groundwater models comparability and the consistency of this risk assessment of groundwater contamination. The EFSA Journal (2004) 93, 1– 20. European Commission, 2001. Guidelines on comparability, extrapolation, group tolerances and data requirements for setting MRLs. SANCO Doc 7525/VI/95-rev.7. pp. 1– 31. Citing Literature Volume8, Issue12December 20101779 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)