Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Shared Decision-Making Preferences of People With Severe Mental Illness

2007; American Psychiatric Association; Volume: 58; Issue: 9 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1176/appi.ps.58.9.1219

1557-9700

Jared Adams, R. E. Drake, G. L. Wolford,

Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Brief ReportFull AccessShared Decision-Making Preferences of People With Severe Mental IllnessJared R. Adams B.S.Robert E. Drake M.D., Ph.D.George L. Wolford Ph.D.Jared R. Adams B.S.Robert E. Drake M.D., Ph.D.George L. Wolford Ph.D.Published Online:1 Sep 2007AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail Shared decision making denotes the process of enabling clients to participate actively and meaningfully in their treatment by providing them with accessible information and choices. There are ethical, clinical, and economic arguments for shared decision making ( 1 ). Self-determination over one's body is considered a fundamental principle of medical ethics ( 2 ). Clients are often best suited to make treatment decisions because only they can value trade-offs in efficacy and side effects ( 3 ). Furthermore, they often experience better outcomes when given information and choices ( 1 ). Several studies have shown that decision aids decrease enthusiasm for expensive and questionably effective therapies and are thus cost-effective ( 4 ). Active client participation often increases satisfaction, facilitates treatment adherence, and in some cases decreases symptom burden ( 4 ). Although many current mental health interventions promote client-centered care, client choice, and self-directed care, the research is just beginning on shared decision making in mental health for clients with severe and persistent mental illness ( 1 , 5 ). MethodsWe explored clients' preferences for decision-making style in a pilot study by administering several decision-making questionnaires, including qualitative and quantitative approaches, to 30 persons with severe mental illnesses at a community mental health center in New Hampshire between July 1 and November 1, 2004, and July 1 and November 1, 2005. Institutional review boards for the state of New Hampshire and for Dartmouth Medical School approved the study, and all respondents provided written informed consent for their participation.The first 15 interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of clients of the mental health center. The last 15 clients were randomly selected from the entire client list at the same center (repeats were excluded). The groups differed minimally in that the randomly selected group was more likely to have had more than a high school education (N=11, or 73%, and N=7, or 47%) and was less likely to be diagnosed as having schizophrenia (N=2, or 13%, and N=8, or 53%), but the findings were similar for the two groups. We therefore present data for the combined study group of 30 clients. We administered two scales to assess preferences for decision-making style. The Autonomy Preference Index Decision-Making scale (API-D) ( 6 ) consists of six discrete Likert questions related to a preference for autonomous decision making and medical information. The responses are scaled from 0 to 100, and a higher score indicates a greater preference for autonomous decision making. The Control Preferences Scale (CPS) ( 7 ) consists of one question that conceptualizes decision making along a linear axis from "mostly my doctor's decision" to "mostly my decision." We applied this simple scale to several decision areas, including medications, housing, jobs, choice of a practitioner, and general medical care. For all scales, instances of "doctor" were replaced with "psychiatrist." We also asked clients open-ended questions regarding decision-making experiences and preferences, and these discussions were used to validate their preferences and perceptions of current services. We examined the association between the CPS rating and the following categorical independent variables: age (older than 50 years), sex, education (further than a high school diploma), self-reported substance abuse, and self-reported diagnosis of schizophrenia. For this analysis we used the chi square test, and we analyzed the API-D results with Student's t test. We compared preferred roles with perceived roles and psychiatric roles with general medical care roles on the CPS by using the Wilcoxon ranked-sum test.ResultsThe mean±SD age of the participants was 47±10 years, 14 (47%) were male, ten (33%) reported having a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis, 19 (63%) were unemployed, eight (27%) had not completed high school, four (13%) completed high school, and 18 (60%) had some education beyond high school.Mean scores on the 100-point API-D preference subscale were 51±9. There were no significant differences in role or information preferences (according to the API-D or the CPS) in relation to age, sex, education, substance abuse, or schizophrenia diagnosis.Table 1 shows preferred and perceived decision-making roles—that is, the roles that clients felt they wanted and those they had experienced. One client had missing data for perceived roles. Clients appeared to vary among themselves and across different decision areas in their preferences for decision-making style. A statistically significant difference emerged in the area of decisions regarding starting new medications, where 39% (derived by subtracting the percentage of clients who experienced a passive role, 62%, from the clients who preferred a passive role, 23%) of clients indicated they would prefer a more active or collaborative role than the one they experienced. In comparing mental health care and general medical care, clients were less likely to prefer a passive role in medication decisions in psychiatry than in general medical care (23% compared with 76%, z=-3.01, p=.003). The CPS was validated by answers to open-ended questions. Clients understood the scale questions and responded in ways consistent with their more detailed answers. Table 1 Preferences of 30 persons with severe mental illness surveyed about general medical and mental health careaTable 1 Preferences of 30 persons with severe mental illness surveyed about general medical and mental health careaEnlarge tableDiscussion and conclusions This pilot study not only identified usable scales to study decision making in the population but also indicated that many clients with severe mental illnesses express a preference for shared decision making. Two previous studies used the API-D to assess people with severe mental illness ( 8 , 9 ). Hill and Laugharne ( 9 ) reported a mean score of 47.7±16.0 among 111 clients of their community health team in England (54% response rate) and a mean score of 54±16 among 49 users of a mental health forum (31% response rate). Hamann and colleagues ( 8 ) reported a mean score of 46±18 among a convenience sample of 122 inpatients with schizophrenia in Germany. These numbers are equidistant between the two poles of autonomy and passivity on the CPS. The findings of these studies, including our own finding of a mean score of 51±9, are slightly higher than those that Ende and colleagues ( 6 ) reported for outpatients with diabetes (API-D: 33.2±12.6), indicating a relatively greater desire for participation in decision making. Degner and colleagues ( 7 ) used the CPS and found a heterogeneous preference among persons being treated for breast cancer (N=223, or 22% autonomous; N=445, or 44% collaborative; and N=344, or 34% passive); only 425 (42%) were in their preferred role. Our results for individuals with severe mental illness resemble those for people with other long-term disorders in expressing varied preferences for decision-making styles, although our clients were more likely to prefer a passive role in general medical care than in psychiatric care. This pilot study has several limitations. The study included a relatively lengthy interview and was designed to examine in depth the usefulness of standardized instruments as well as outcomes. The study group was small, and the statistical tests therefore lacked power. The study group also was skewed toward educated and employed clients in a mental health center. People with less education or motivation or those in other settings may differ in their desires for participating in shared decision making. Larger and more representative study groups are needed to establish stable confidence intervals. The study did not address concerns regarding temporary decisional incapacity. Although not a limitation, the large discrepancies between preferred and perceived roles in new medication, hospitalization, and choice of psychiatrist may indicate that these areas make incorporating patient preferences in the decision-making scheme more difficult. Nevertheless, our data suggest several clinically relevant implications that are worthy of further attention. First, clients with severe mental illnesses appear to differ among themselves in their preferences for shared decision making, but many prefer active and collaborative roles, similar to those with other medical conditions. Second, clients appear to prefer greater participation in mental health treatment decisions than they are accorded. This finding is consistent with qualitative research on psychiatric decision making ( 10 ) and with the conclusions of the President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health ( 11 ) and the Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions: Quality Chasm Series ( 12 ), all of which stress the importance of care that is guided by patients' preferences and by shared knowledge that stems from the free flow of information. Finally, clients' preferences appear to vary in relation to different types of decisions, but they are particularly interested in active roles in relation to psychotropic medications. Acknowledgments and disclosuresThis work was sponsored by the Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making George Bennett Fellowship and by the West Foundation.The authors report no competing interests.The authors are affiliated with Dartmouth Medical School, 400 Kellogg Bldg., Hanover, NH 03755 (e-mail: [email protected]). Dr. Wolford is also with the Department of Psychology, Dartmouth College.References1. Adams JR, Drake RE: Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice. Community Mental Health Journal 21:1–19, 2006Google Scholar2. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Making Health Care Decisions. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1982Google Scholar3. Charles C, Demaio S: Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework. Journal of Health Policy Law 18:881–904, 1993Google Scholar4. O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al: Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3:CD001 431, 2001Google Scholar5. Hamann J, Leucht S, Kissling W: Shared decision making in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 107:403–409, 2003Google Scholar6. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, et al: Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine 4:23–30, 1989Google Scholar7. Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al: Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 277:1485–1492, 1997Google Scholar8. Hamann J, Cohen R, Leucht S, et al: Do patients with schizophrenia wish to be involved in decisions about their medical treatment? American Journal of Psychiatry 162:2382–2384, 2005Google Scholar9. Hill SA, Laugharne R: Decision making and information seeking preferences among psychiatric patients. Journal of Mental Health 15:75–84, 2006Google Scholar10. Deegan PE, Drake RE: Shared decision making and medication management in the recovery process: from compliance to alliance. Psychiatric Services 57:1636–1639, 2006Google Scholar11. Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America. Pub no SMA-03-3832. Rockville, Md, Department of Health and Human Services, President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, 2003Google Scholar12. Board on Health Care Services: Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions: Quality Chasm Series. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2006Google Scholar FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited byTreatment decision making in psychiatry: Formulating patients' perspectives in outpatient psychiatric consultations27 March 2023 | Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 14The structure of social support: a multilevel analysis of the personal networks of people with severe mental disorders14 November 2022 | BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 22, No. 1Drivers of shared decision making in inpatient psychiatry: An exploratory survey of patients' and multi-disciplinary team members' perspectivesGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, Vol. 79Making People Autonomous: A Sociological Analysis of the Uses of Contracts and Projects in the Psychiatric Care Institutions5 March 2019 | Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, Vol. 46, No. 2Perspectives of Patients and Providers in Using Shared Decision Making in Psychiatry27 June 2021 | Community Mental Health Journal, Vol. 58, No. 3Initiation of quarterly palmitate paliperidone in French clinical practice: Results from the observational, cross‐sectional OPTIMUS study6 January 2022 | Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Vol. 31, No. 3Case Management and Assertive Community Treatment18 October 2022Reducing the Impacts of Mental Health Stigma Through Integrated Primary Care: An Examination of the Evidence29 September 2020 | Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, Vol. 28, No. 4Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus (IDEAL): study protocol of a multi-site implementation trial with observational, case study design11 March 2021 | Implementation Science Communications, Vol. 2, No. 1A Systematic Review of Shared Decision–Making Interventions for Service Users With Serious Mental Illnesses: State of the Science and Future DirectionsElizabeth C. Thomas, Ph.D., Shelly Ben-David, Ph.D., Emily Treichler, Ph.D., Stephanie Roth, M.L.I.S., Lisa B. Dixon, M.D., M.P.H., Mark Salzer, Ph.D., Yaara Zisman-Ilani, M.A., Ph.D.9 August 2021 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 72, No. 11Opiniones de Familiares de Personas con Enfermedad Mental Sobre su Participación en la Toma de Decisiones Clínicas. Un Estudio de Grupo FocalRevista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, Vol. 21NICE shared decision making guidelines and mental health: challenges for research, practice and implementation2 September 2021 | BJPsych Open, Vol. 7, No. 5The Association between Patient Activation and Outcomes among Severely Mentally Ill Patients17 November 2020 | The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, Vol. 48, No. 3Barriers and Enablers to Shared Decision Making in Psychiatric Medication Management: A Qualitative Investigation of Clinician and Service Users' Views17 June 2021 | Frontiers in Psychiatry, Vol. 12Shared decision making for psychiatric medication management: a summary of its uptake, barriers and facilitators29 January 2021 | International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, Vol. 43, No. 3Correlates of preferring a passive role in decision-making among patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorderPatient Education and Counseling, Vol. 104, No. 5Computerized Conjoint Analysis of the Weight Treatment Preferences of Individuals With SchizophreniaNichole Goodsmith, M.D., Ph.D., Amy N. Cohen, Ph.D., Anthony W. P. Flynn, B.A., Alison B. Hamilton, Ph.D., M.P.H., Gerhard Hellemann, Ph.D., Nancy Nowlin-Finch, M.D., Alexander S. Young, M.D., M.S.H.S.12 January 2021 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 72, No. 3Patient and service-related barriers and facitators to the acceptance and use of interventions to promote communication in health and social care: a realist review4 June 2020 | BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 20, No. 1Mental health professionals' experiences with shared decision-making for patients with psychotic disorders: a qualitative study27 November 2020 | BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 20, No. 1Toma de decisiones en pacientes psiquiátricos: un estudio cualitativo con grupos focalesRevista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, Vol. 49, No. 4Decision making in psychiatric patients: A qualitative study with focus groupsRevista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (English ed.), Vol. 49, No. 4Building a therapeutic relationship between probation officers and probationers with serious mental illnesses24 February 2020 | CNS Spectrums, Vol. 25, No. 5Development and Psychometric Analysis of the Patient Preferences for Engagement Tool24 January 2020 | Nursing Research, Vol. 69, No. 4Lung cancer screening decisional needs among African American smokers of lower socioeconomic status5 June 2020 | Ethnicity & Health, Vol. 20Clients' experiences of shared decision making in an integrative psychotherapy for depressionJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 26, No. 2The Shared Decision-Making Process in the Pharmacological Management of Depression23 September 2019 | The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Vol. 13, No. 1Clients' Practices for Resisting Treatment Recommendations in Japanese Outpatient Psychiatry22 June 2020Ethical challenges of seclusion in psychiatric inpatient wards: a qualitative study of the experiences of Norwegian mental health professionals21 November 2019 | BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 19, No. 1Survey of Patient-Centered Coordination of Care for Diabetes with Cardiovascular and Mental Health Comorbidities in the Department of Veterans Affairs16 May 2019 | Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 34, No. S1A learning health system for people with severe mental illness: a promise for continuous learning, patient coproduction and more effective care6 June 2019 | Digital Psychiatry, Vol. 2, No. 1Mental Health Review Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2Sociology of Health & Illness, Vol. 41, No. 2Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 25, No. 6Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 26, No. 1-2Systematisk måling av brukererfaringer blant medlemmerpå klubbhus for psykososial rehabiliteringTidsskrift for omsorgsforskning, Vol. 4, No. 1Development of a Shared Decision Making Model in a Community Mental Health Center4 April 2017 | Community Mental Health Journal, Vol. 54, No. 1Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Vol. 2, No. 3Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 239Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 27, No. 1Health Communication, Vol. 33, No. 11Health Expectations, Vol. 21, No. 1International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 27, No. 6BJPsych Open, Vol. 4, No. 1PLOS ONE, Vol. 13, No. 6Shared decision making in mental health: the importance for current clinical practice10 October 2017 | Australasian Psychiatry, Vol. 25, No. 6Attitudes towards shared decision making in mental health: a qualitative synthesisMental Health Review Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3Shared decision making: People with severe mental illness experiences of involvement in the care of their physical healthMental Health & Prevention, Vol. 5What Factors are Associated with Consumer Initiation of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Visits?1 October 2015 | Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, Vol. 44, No. 1Community Mental Health Journal, Vol. 53, No. 8International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, Vol. 39, No. 4Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, Vol. 31, No. 5Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 92Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 75Network Science, Vol. 5, No. 3Research on Language and Social Interaction, Vol. 50, No. 2Social Work in Mental Health, Vol. 15, No. 6Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, Vol. 53, No. 2BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 18, No. 1BJPsych Bulletin, Vol. 41, No. 4PLOS ONE, Vol. 12, No. 3Problems and Perspectives in Management, Vol. 15, No. 1Effects of Clinical Decision Topic on Patients' Involvement in and Satisfaction With Decisions and Their Subsequent ImplementationMarion Freidl, M.D., Francesca Pesola, Psy.D., Jana Konrad, M.D., Bernd Puschner, P.D. Dr. phil., Attila Istvan Kovacs, M.D., Corrado De Rosa, M.D., Andrea Fiorillo, M.D., Malene Krogsgaard Bording, Ph.D., Wolfram Kawohl, M.D., Wulf Rössler, M.D., Marietta Nagy, M.D., Povl Munk-Jørgensen, M.D., Mike Slade, Psy.D.14 February 2016 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 67, No. 6Participation in medical decision-making across Europe: An international longitudinal multicenter study23 March 2020 | European Psychiatry, Vol. 35FMC - Formación Médica Continuada en Atención Primaria, Vol. 23, No. 6FMC - Formación Médica Continuada en Atención Primaria, Vol. 23, No. 2Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 86Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 99, No. 7Psychiatric Clinics of North America, Vol. 39, No. 2Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, Vol. 34, No. 11Women's Health Issues, Vol. 26, No. 5Global Mental Health, Vol. 3American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Vol. 19, No. 3Early Intervention in Psychiatry, Vol. 10, No. 3Health Expectations, Vol. 19, No. 5BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 16, No. 1PLOS ONE, Vol. 11, No. 2Frontiers in Psychiatry, Vol. 7Service users' experiences of participation in decision making in mental health services3 July 2015 | Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 22, No. 9Scope of shared decision making in patients with psychologic complaintsThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 33, No. 6Adherence to Medication in Psychiatric Disorders20 February 2015A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of a Patient Decision Aid for Posttraumatic Stress DisorderBradley V. Watts, M.D., M.P.H. Paula P. Schnurr, Ph.D. Maha Zayed, Ph.D. Yinong Young-Xu, M.S., Sc.D. Patricia Stender Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, M.Sc., Ph.D.2 February 2015 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 66, No. 2Community Mental Health Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Vol. 8, No. 6Asian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 14Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Vol. 11, No. 2Health Expectations, Vol. 18, No. 6Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 49, No. 5Factors Associated With Shared Decision–Making Preferences Among Veterans With Serious Mental IllnessStephanie G. Park, Ph.D. Marisa Derman, M.D. Lisa B. Dixon, M.D., M.P.H. Clayton H. Brown, Ph.D. Elizabeth A. Klingaman, Ph.D. Li Juan Fang, M.S. Deborah R. Medoff, Ph.D. Julie Kreyenbuhl, Pharm.D., Ph.D.1 December 2014 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 65, No. 12Community Mental Health Care in the FutureJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, Vol. 202, No. 6Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 97, No. 3Shared Decision Making for Clients With Mental Illness22 May 2013 | Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 23, No. 6Eight steps toward recovery-oriented psychiatry educationThe Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, Vol. 8, No. 3Political Engagement as an Element of Social Recovery: A Qualitative StudySara M. Bergstresser, Ph.D., M.P.H., Isaac S. Brown, and Amy Colesante, B.S.1 August 2013 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 64, No. 8Levels of Patient Activation Among Adults With SchizophreniaJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, Vol. 201, No. 4BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol. 13, No. 1Journal of Interprofessional Care, Vol. 27, No. 3Journal of Interprofessional Care, Vol. 27, No. 5Trust, choice and power in mental health care: Experiences of patients with psychosis3 August 2011 | International Journal of Social Psychiatry, Vol. 58, No. 5Public Health Reviews, Vol. 34, No. 2Do Patients With Schizophrenia Distinguish Between Attitudes Toward Antipsychotic Medication and Pharmacotherapy in General?Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, Vol. 200, No. 1BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 12, No. 1Case Management and Assertive Community Treatment12 April 2012Economic Approaches to Improving Access to Evidence-Based and Recovery-Oriented Services for People with Severe Mental Illness1 September 2011 | The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 56, No. 9The Effect of an Inpatient Transition Intervention on Attendance at the First Appointment Postdischarge From a Psychiatric Hospitalization29 September 2011 | Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, Vol. 17, No. 5References14 April 2011Trial of an Electronic Decision Support System to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Community Mental HealthEmily M. Woltmann, M.S.W., Ph.D., Sandra M. Wilkniss, Ph.D., Alexandra Teachout, M.A., Gregory J. McHugo, Ph.D., and Robert E. Drake, M.D., Ph.D.1 January 2011 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 62, No. 1Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 85, No. 3BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 11, No. 1BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 11, No. 1Journal of Interprofessional Care, Vol. 25, No. 6Comprehensive Electronic Decision Support SystemsRobert E. Drake, M.D., Ph.D.Patricia E. Deegan, Ph.D.Emily Woltmann, Ph.D., M.S.W.William Haslett, M.A.Tyler Drake, M.S.Charles A. Rapp, Ph.D.1 July 2010 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 61, No. 7Older Adults with Bipolar Disorder: Guidelines for Primary Care ProvidersJournal of Gerontological Nursing, Vol. 36, No. 5Best Practices: Best Practices for Improving Engagement of Clients in Clinic CareThomas E. Smith, M.D.Jeannette Burgos, A.C.S.W.Victoria Dexter, L.C.S.W.James Norcott, M.S.W., M.P.A.Stella V. Pappas, L.C.S.W.Ellen Shuman, L.C.S.W.Anita Appel, L.C.S.W.Myla E. Harrison, M.D., M.P.H.Ilana R. Nossel, M.D.Susan M. Essock, Ph.D.1 April 2010 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 61, No. 4Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions20 January 2010 | Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Vol. 68International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 25, No. 11Community Mental Health Journal, Vol. 46, No. 5Community Mental Health Journal, Vol. 46, No. 5Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1Shared decision making in mental health: prospects for personalized medicine1 April 2022 | Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 11, No. 4LetterPatrick W. Corrigan, Psy.D.Jonathon E. Larson, Ed.D.1 November 2009 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 60, No. 11LetterRobert E. Drake, M.D., Ph.D.Patricia E. Deegan, Ph.D.1 November 2009 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 60, No. 11LetterAndrea Raballo, M.D.Frank Larøi, Ph.D.1 November 2009 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 60, No. 11LetterHarriet P. Lefley, Ph.D.1 November 2009 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 60, No. 11LetterIgnacio David Acevedo-Polakovich, Ph.D.Linda M. Callejas, M.A.Mario Hernandez, Ph.D.1 November 2009 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 60, No. 11LetterA. George Awad, M.D., Ph.D.Lakshmi N. P. Voruganti, M.D., Ph.D.1 November 2009 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 60, No. 11LetterGrayson S. Norquist, M.D., M.S.P.H.1 November 2009 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 60, No. 11LetterShannon Gulliver, M.D., M.Phil.1 November 2009 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 60, No. 11LetterAnna C. Muriel, M.D., M.P.H.William Pirl, M.D.1 November 2009 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 60, No. 11Psychiatrists' Use of Shared Decision Making in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Patient Characteristics and Decision TopicsJohannes Hamann, M.D.Rosmarie Mendel, Ph.D.Rudolf Cohen, Ph.D.Stephan Heres, M.D.Matthias Ziegler, Ph.D.Markus Bühner, Ph.D.Werner Kissling, M.D.13 January 2015 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 60, No. 8A New Kind of Homelessness for Individuals With Serious Mental Illness? The Need for a "Mental Health Home"Thomas E. Smith, M.D.Lloyd I. Sederer, M.D.13 January 2015 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 60, No. 4Public-Academic Partnerships: The Thresholds-Dartmouth Partnership and Research on Shared Decision MakingRobert E. Drake, M.D., Ph.D.Sandra M. Wilkniss, Ph.D.Rochelle L. Frounfelker, M.S.S.W., M.P.H.Rob Whitley, Ph.D.Anthony M. Zipple, Sc.D., M.B.A.Gregory J. McHugo, Ph.D.Gary R. Bond, Ph.D.13 January 2015 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 60, No. 2Shared Decision Making in Antipsychotic ManagementJournal of Psychiatric Practice, Vol. 14, No. 6Recent advances in shared decision making for mental healthCurrent Opinion in Psychiatry, Vol. 21, No. 6Current World LiteratureCurrent Opinion in Psychiatry, Vol. 21, No. 6SSRIs and Depression in Children and Adolescents: The Imperative for Shared Decision-Making1 January 2008 | Australasian Psychiatry, Vol. 16, No. 5Safety and Security in Small-Scale Recovery Housing for People With Severe Mental Illness: An Inner-City Case StudyRob Whitley, Ph.D.Maxine Harris, Ph.D.Robert E. Drake, M.D., Ph.D.1 February 2008 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 59, No. 2Community Mental Health Journal, Vol. 44, No. 5Commentary: Psychiatric Advance Directives and Recovery-Oriented CareMarvin S. Swartz, M.D.Jeffrey W. Swanson, Ph.D.1 September 2007 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 58, No. 9 Volume 58Issue 9 September, 2007Pages 1219-1221PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES September 2007 Volume 58 Number 9 Metrics PDF download History Published online 1 September 2007 Published in print 1 September 2007