Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II

2016; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 196; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091

1527-3792

Dean G. Assimos, Amy E. Krambeck, Nicole L. Miller, Manoj Monga, M. Hassan Murad, Caleb P. Nelson, Kenneth T. Pace, Vernon M. Pais, Margaret S. Pearle, Glenn M. Preminger, Hassan Razvi, Ojas Shah, Brian R. Matlaga,

Ureteral procedures and complications

No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Oct 2016Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II Dean Assimos, Amy Krambeck, Nicole L. Miller, Manoj Monga, M. Hassan Murad, Caleb P. Nelson, Kenneth T. Pace, Vernon M. Pais, Margaret S. Pearle, Glenn M. Preminger, Hassan Razvi, Ojas Shah, and Brian R. Matlaga Dean AssimosDean Assimos More articles by this author , Amy KrambeckAmy Krambeck More articles by this author , Nicole L. MillerNicole L. Miller More articles by this author , Manoj MongaManoj Monga More articles by this author , M. Hassan MuradM. Hassan Murad More articles by this author , Caleb P. NelsonCaleb P. Nelson More articles by this author , Kenneth T. PaceKenneth T. Pace More articles by this author , Vernon M. PaisVernon M. Pais More articles by this author , Margaret S. PearleMargaret S. Pearle More articles by this author , Glenn M. PremingerGlenn M. Preminger More articles by this author , Hassan RazviHassan Razvi More articles by this author , Ojas ShahOjas Shah More articles by this author , and Brian R. MatlagaBrian R. Matlaga More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: This Guideline is intended to provide a clinical framework for the surgical management of patients with kidney and/or ureteral stones. The summary presented herein represents Part II of the two-part series dedicated to Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. Please refer to Part I for introductory information and a discussion of pre-operative imaging and special cases. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the literature (search dates 1/1/1985 to 5/31/2015) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed studies relevant to the surgical management of stones. The review yielded an evidence base of 1,911 articles after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. These publications were used to create the Guideline statements. Evidence-based statements of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendation were developed based on benefits and risks/burdens to patients. Additional directives are provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions when insufficient evidence existed. Results: The Panel identified 12 adult Index Patients to represent the most common cases seen in clinical practice. Three additional Index Patients were also created to describe the more commonly encountered special cases, including pediatric and pregnant patients. With these patients in mind, Guideline statements were developed to aid the clinician in identifying optimal management. Conclusions: Proper treatment selection, which is directed by patient- and stone-specific factors, remains the greatest predictor of successful treatment outcomes. This Guideline is intended for use in conjunction with the individual patient’s treatment goals. In all cases, patient preferences and personal goals should be considered when choosing a management strategy. References 1 : Natural history and current concepts for the treatment of small ureteral calculi. Eur Urol1993; 24: 172. Google Scholar 2 Barrionuevo Moreno P, Asi N, Benkhadra K et al: Surgical management of kidney stones: a systematic review. Unpublished data. Google Scholar 3 : Recovery following complete chronic unilateral ureteral occlusion: functional, radiographic and pathologic alterations. J Urol1973; 100: 27. Google Scholar 4 Lasser MS and Pareek G: Smith’s Textbook of Endourology 3rd Edition, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012; p273. Google Scholar 5 : 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol2007; 178: 2418. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol1997; 158: 1915. Link, Google Scholar 7 : Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol2011; 186: 1328. Google Scholar 8 : A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing nonstented vs stented ureteroscopic lithotripsy. J Urol2001; 165: 1419. Link, Google Scholar 9 : Prestenting improves ureteroscopic stone-free rates. J Endourol2007; 21: 1277. Google Scholar 10 : Preoperative stent placement decreases cost of ureteroscopy. Urology2011; 78: 309. Google Scholar 11 : Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients. Urology2012; 80: 1214. Google Scholar 12 : Effects of α-blockers, antimuscarinics, or combination therapy in relieving ureteral stent-related symptoms: a meta-analysis. J Endourol2015; 29: 650. Google Scholar 13 : Meta-analysis showing the beneficial effect of α-blockers on ureteric stent discomfort. BJU Int2011; 108: 1894. Google Scholar 14 : The beneficial effect of alpha-blockers for ureteral stent-related discomfort: systematic review and network meta-analysis for alfuzosin versus tamsulosin versus placebo. BMC Urol2015; 15: 55. Google Scholar 15 : Is there a role for α-blockers in ureteral stent related symptoms? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol2011; 186: 928. Link, Google Scholar 16 : Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the management of large, proximal ureteral stones: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol2008; 22: 2677. Google Scholar 17 : Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy. J Urol2012; 187: 164. Link, Google Scholar 18 : A prospective, multi-institutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm. J Urol2015; 193: 165. Link, Google Scholar 19 : Electrohydraulic versus pneumatic disintegration in the treatment of ureteral stones: a randomized, prospective trial. J Urol1995; 153: 623. Link, Google Scholar 20 : Optimal method of urgent decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi. J Urol1998; 160: 1260. Link, Google Scholar 21 : Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2014; 11: CD007044. Google Scholar 22 : Treatment of ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Urol2012; 188: 130. Link, Google Scholar 23 : A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter. J Endourol2012; 26: 52. Google Scholar 24 : Staghorn calculi: analysis of treatment results between initial percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy with reference to surface area. J Urol1992; 147: 1219. Link, Google Scholar 25 : A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol2007; 51: 1688. Google Scholar 26 : Nephrectomy for benign disease in the UK: results from the British Association of Urological Surgeons nephrectomy database. BJU Int2015; 117: 138. Google Scholar 27 : Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol2005; 173: 2005. Link, Google Scholar 28 : Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol2001; 166: 2072. Link, Google Scholar 29 : Natural history of residual fragments following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol2009; 181: 1163. Link, Google Scholar 30 : Clinically insignificant residual stone fragments: an acceptable term in the computed tomography era?. Urology2013; 81: 723. Google Scholar 31 : Clinically insignificant residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: medium-term follow-up. J Endourol2011; 25: 941. Google Scholar 32 : Routine flexible nephroscopy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones with low density: a prospective randomized study. J Urol2013; 190: 144. Link, Google Scholar 33 : Saline is our friend. Urology2009; 1: 28. Google Scholar 34 : Hemolysis in transurethral resection of the prostate using distilled water as the irrigant. J Chin Med Assoc2006; 69: 270. Google Scholar 35 : Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2-3cm: a multiinstitutional experience. J Endourol2010; 24: 1583. Google Scholar 36 : Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral and kidney malformations. Urol Int2001; 66: 61. Google Scholar 37 : Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract calculi in patients with cystectomy and urinary diversion. Urology2005; 66: 510. Google Scholar 38 : Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy. Urol Ann2013; 5: 88. Google Scholar 39 : Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Nephron1999; 81: 71. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar © 2016 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byBaldea K (2023) Editorial CommentaryUrology Practice, VOL. 10, NO. 2, (169-169), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023.DiBianco J, Daignault-Newton S, Dupati A, Hiller S, Kachroo N, Seifman B, Wenzler D, Dauw C and Ghani K (2023) Stent Omission in Pre-stented Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopy Decreases Unplanned Health Care UtilizationUrology Practice, VOL. 10, NO. 2, (163-169), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023.Tasian G, Maltenfort M, Rove K, Ching C, Ramachandra P, DeFoor B, Fernandez N, Forrest C and Ellison J (2023) Ureteral Stent Placement Prior to Definitive Stone Treatment Is Associated With Higher Postoperative Emergency Department Visits and Opioid Prescriptions for Youth Having Ureteroscopy or Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, Yaghoubian A, Anastos H, Khusid J, Shimonov R, Lundon D, Khargi R, Gallante B, Gassmann K, Bamberger J, Chandhoke R, Zampini A, Atallah W and Gupta M (2023) Displacement of Lower Pole Stones During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Improves Stone-free Status: A Prospective Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of Urology, Hall M, Thiel J, Dunmire B, Samson P, Kessler R, Sunaryo P, Sweet R, Metzler I, Chang H, Gunn M, Dighe M, Anderson L, Popchoi C, Managuli R, Cunitz B, Burke B, Ding L, Gutierrez B, Liu Z, Sorensen M, Wessells H, Bailey M and Harper J (2022) First Series Using Ultrasonic Propulsion and Burst Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral StonesJournal of Urology, VOL. 208, NO. 5, (1075-1082), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2022.Harper J, Lingeman J, Sweet R, Metzler I, Sunaryo P, Williams J, Maxwell A, Thiel J, Cunitz B, Dunmire B, Bailey M and Sorensen M (2022) Fragmentation of Stones by Burst Wave Lithotripsy in the First 19 HumansJournal of Urology, VOL. 207, NO. 5, (1067-1076), Online publication date: 1-May-2022.Perrella R, Vicentini F, Paro E, Torricelli F, Marchini G, Danilovic A, Batagello C, Mota P, Ferreira D, Cohen D, Murta C, Claro J, Giusti G, Monga M, Nahas W, Srougi M and Mazzucchi E (2021) Supine versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Stones: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of Urology, VOL. 207, NO. 3, (647-656), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022.Tapiero S, Kaler K, Jiang P, Lu S, Cottone C, Patel R, Okhunov Z, Klopfer M, Landman J and Clayman R (2021) Determining the Safety Threshold for the Passage of a Ureteral Access Sheath in Clinical Practice Using a Purpose-Built Force SensorJournal of Urology, VOL. 206, NO. 2, (364-372), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2021.Djang R, Stahl J and Pais V (2021) Informing the Management of Asymptomatic Nephrolithiasis: Markov Decision Analysis for the 1 cm Renal StoneUrology Practice, VOL. 8, NO. 4, (495-502), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021.Jiang P, Xie L, Arada R, Patel R, Landman J and Clayman R (2020) Qualitative Review of Clinical Guidelines for Medical and Surgical Management of Urolithiasis: Consensus and Controversy 2020Journal of Urology, VOL. 205, NO. 4, (999-1008), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021.Innes G, Scheuermeyer F, McRae A, Law M, Teichman J, Grafstein E and Andruchow J (2020) Which Patients Should Have Early Surgical Intervention for Acute Ureteral Colic?Journal of Urology, VOL. 205, NO. 1, (152-158), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021.Haas C, Li G, Hyams E and Shah O (2020) Delayed Decompression of Obstructing Stones with Urinary Tract Infection is Associated with Increased Odds of DeathJournal of Urology, VOL. 204, NO. 6, (1256-1262), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020.Assimos D (2020) Re: Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the Safety and Clarity of Water versus Saline Irrigant in UreteroscopyJournal of Urology, VOL. 204, NO. 4, (874-874), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020.Bowen D, Song L, Faerber J, Kim J, Scales C and Tasian G (2020) Re-Treatment after Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Population Based Comparative Effectiveness StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 203, NO. 6, (1156-1162), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020.Su Z and Koo K (2020) Editorial CommentaryUrology Practice, VOL. 7, NO. 3, (180-181), Online publication date: 1-May-2020.Lightner D, Wymer K, Sanchez J and Kavoussi L (2019) Best Practice Statement on Urologic Procedures and Antimicrobial ProphylaxisJournal of Urology, VOL. 203, NO. 2, (351-356), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2020.Assimos D (2018) Re: Systematic Review of Calyceal DiverticulumJournal of Urology, VOL. 201, NO. 1, (24-25), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019.Assimos D (2018) Re: Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower-Pole Renal Calculi: An International Multicentre Randomised Controlled TrialJournal of Urology, VOL. 201, NO. 1, (24-24), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019.Assimos D (2018) Re: Effect of Tamsulosin on Passage of Symptomatic Ureteral Stones: A Randomized Clinical TrialJournal of Urology, VOL. 200, NO. 5, (938-941), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018.Assimos D (2018) Re: The Transgluteal Approach to Shockwave Lithotripsy to Treat Distal Ureter Stones: A Prospective, Randomized, and Multicenter StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 200, NO. 4, (693-694), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018.Portis J, Neises S and Portis A (2018) Pain is Independent of Stone Burden and Predicts Surgical Intervention in Patients with Ureteral StonesJournal of Urology, VOL. 200, NO. 3, (597-603), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018.Dai J, Ahn J, Holt S, May P, Sorensen M and Harper J (2018) National Imaging Trends after Percutaneous NephrolithotomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 200, NO. 1, (147-153), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018.Pradère B, Doizi S, Proietti S, Brachlow J and Traxer O (2017) Evaluation of Guidelines for Surgical Management of UrolithiasisJournal of Urology, VOL. 199, NO. 5, (1267-1271), Online publication date: 1-May-2018.Hernandez N, Mozafarpour S, Song Y and Eisner B (2017) Cessation of Ureteral Colic Does Not Necessarily Mean that a Ureteral Stone Has Been ExpelledJournal of Urology, VOL. 199, NO. 4, (1011-1014), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018.Otto B, Terry R, Lutfi F, Syed J, Hamann H, Gupta M and Bird V (2017) The Effect of Continued Low Dose Aspirin Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous NephrolithotomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 199, NO. 3, (748-753), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018.Assimos D (2017) Re: A Survey of Patient Preferences Regarding Medical Expulsive Therapy following the SUSPEND TrialJournal of Urology, VOL. 198, NO. 5, (975-976), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017.Assimos D (2017) Re: Primary SWL is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 198, NO. 4, (736-739), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017.Assimos D (2016) Re: Defining the Rate of Primary Ureteroscopic Failure in Unstented Patients: A Multi-Institutional StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 197, NO. 1, (171-171), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017. Volume 196Issue 4October 2016Page: 1161-1169 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsnephrolithiasisureteroscopynephrostomy, percutaneousMetricsAuthor Information Dean Assimos More articles by this author Amy Krambeck More articles by this author Nicole L. Miller More articles by this author Manoj Monga More articles by this author M. Hassan Murad More articles by this author Caleb P. Nelson More articles by this author Kenneth T. Pace More articles by this author Vernon M. Pais More articles by this author Margaret S. Pearle More articles by this author Glenn M. Preminger More articles by this author Hassan Razvi More articles by this author Ojas Shah More articles by this author Brian R. Matlaga More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...