Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Part II
2004; Wiley; Volume: 94; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Romeno
10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.04951.x
ISSN1464-410X
AutoresLaurent Salomon, Philippe Sèbe, Alexandre de la Taille, Dimitri Vordos, András Hoznek, R. Yiou, Dominique Chopin, C.C. Abbou,
Tópico(s)Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
ResumoBJU InternationalVolume 94, Issue 2 p. 244-250 Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Part II Laurent Salomon, Corresponding Author Laurent Salomon Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceLaurent Salomon, Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 51 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorPhilippe Sèbe, Philippe Sèbe Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorAlexandre De la Taille, Alexandre De la Taille Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorDimitri Vordos, Dimitri Vordos Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorAndras Hoznek, Andras Hoznek Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorRené Yiou, René Yiou Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorDominique Chopin, Dominique Chopin Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorClaude C. Abbou, Claude C. Abbou Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this author Laurent Salomon, Corresponding Author Laurent Salomon Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceLaurent Salomon, Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 51 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorPhilippe Sèbe, Philippe Sèbe Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorAlexandre De la Taille, Alexandre De la Taille Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorDimitri Vordos, Dimitri Vordos Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorAndras Hoznek, Andras Hoznek Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorRené Yiou, René Yiou Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorDominique Chopin, Dominique Chopin Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this authorClaude C. Abbou, Claude C. Abbou Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, FranceSearch for more papers by this author First published: 24 June 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04951.xCitations: 53Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES 1 Walsh PC. The status of radical prostatectomy in the United States in 1993. Where do we go from here? J Urol 1994; 152: 1816 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2 Fusco MA, Paluzzi MW. Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for adenocarcinoma of the colon. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 858–61 10.1007/BF02047384 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3 Alexander RJ, Jacques BC, Mitchell KG. Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and wound recurrence. Lancet 1993; 341: 249–50 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90121-V CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4 Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187: 46–54 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00132-X CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5 Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2224–9 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6 Cicco A, Salomon L, Hoznek H et al. Carcinological risks and retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Eur Urol 2000; 38: 606–12 10.1159/000020339 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7 Bangma C, Kirkels W, Chadha S. Cutaneous metastasis following laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostatic carcinoma;. J Urol 1995; 153: 1635–6 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67484-6 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 8 Cadeddu J, Elashry O, Snyder O et al. Effects of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection on the natural history of D1 (T1–3, N1–3, M0) prostate cancer. Urology 1997; 50: 381–4 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00243-4 Web of Science®Google Scholar 9 Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Roumeguere T et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 65–9 10.1159/000049750 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Rabenalt R et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures. J Urol 2003; 169: 2066–71 10.1097/01.ju.0000067220.84015.8e PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 11 Dubernard P, Benchetrit S, Chaffange P, Hamza T. Van Box Som Prostatectomy extra péritonéale rétrograde laparoscopique (P.E.R.L.) Technique simplifiée (à propos d'une série de 143 cas). Prog Urol 1993; 13: 163–74 Google Scholar 12 Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Borkowki T et al. Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extrapyramidal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Urology 2003; 61: 617–22 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02415-9 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 13 Wieder JA, Soloway MS. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 1998; 160: 299–315 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62881-7 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14 Brehmer B, Borchers H, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Biesterfeld S, Jakse G. Perioperative morbidity of the extended radical perineal prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 139–43 10.1159/000049764 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 15 Hoznek A, Sammadi DB, Salomon L et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Published series. Curr Urol Report 2002; 3: 141–7 10.1007/s11934-002-0026-3 PubMedGoogle Scholar 16 Lepor H, Nieder AM, Ferrandino MN. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1000 cases. J Urol 2001; 166: 1729–33 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65662-5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 17 Catalona WJ, Carvalhal F, Mager DE, Smith DS. Potency, continence and complications rates in 1870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 1999; 162: 433–8 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68578-3 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 18 Weldon VE, Tavel FR, Neuwirth H. Continence, potency and morbidity after radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 1997; 158: 1470–5 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64245-9 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 19 Ruiz-Deya G, Davis R, Srivastav SK, Wise AM, Thomas R. Outpatient radical prostatectomy. impact of standard perineal approach on patient outcome. J Urol 2001; 166: 581–6 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65988-5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 20 Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1000 consecutive patients. J Urol 2002; 167: 528–34 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)69079-7 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 21 Guillonneau B, El-Fettouh H, Baumert H et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1000 cases at Montsouris institute. J Urol 2003; 169: 1261–6 10.1097/01.ju.0000055141.36916.be CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 22 Rassweiler, J, Zeeman O, Schulze M, Tebr D, Hatzinger M, Frede T. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 2003; 169: 1689–93 10.1097/01.ju.0000062614.56629.41 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 23 Boccon-Gibod L, Ravery V, Vordos D, Toublanc M, Delmas V, Boccon-Gibod L. Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. perineal approach increases risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions. J Urol 1998; 160: 1383–5 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62543-6 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 24 Weldon VE. Letter to the Editor. Response to 'radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increase the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incision' J Urol 1999; 161: 1287 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)61668-9 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 25 Parra RO, Boullier JA, Rauscher JA, Cummings JM. The value of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in conjunction with radical perineal or retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1994; 151: 1599–602 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 26 Teichman JM, Reddy PK, Hulbert JC. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology 1995; 5: 823–30 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80090-9 Web of Science®Google Scholar 27 Frazier HA, Robertson JE, Paulson DF. Radical prostatectomy. the pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach. J Urol 1992; 147: 888–90 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37413-X CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 28 Haab F, Boccon-Gibod L, Delmas V, Boccon-Gibod L, Toublanc M. Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer. Br J Urol 1994; 74: 626–9 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1994.tb09195.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 29 Salomon L, Colombel M, Patard JJ et al. Voies rétropubiennes et périnéales. plaidoyer pour la prostatectomy radicale par voie périnéale. Prog Urol 1997; 7: 976–83 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 30 Kahn SA, Tiwari A, Narayan P. Radical perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy: a clinical comparison. J Urol 1998; 159 (Suppl.): 61 Web of Science®Google Scholar 31 Lance RS, Thraher JB, Friedrihs PA, Kane C, Powell CR, Moul JW. Comparison of radical perineal prostatectomy to radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Uniformed Services Urology Research Group (USURG) experience. BJU Int 2001; 87: 61–5 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.00023.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 32 Walther PJ. Radical perineal vs retropubic prostatectomy. a review of optimal application and technical consideration in the utilization of these procedures. Eur Urol 1998; 24: 34–8 Google Scholar 33 Korman HJ, Leu PB, Huang RR, Goldstein NS. A centralized comparison of radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy specimens: is there a difference according to the surgical approach? J Urol 2002; 168: 991–4 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64558-2 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 34 Carter HB, Sauvageot J, Walsh PC, Epstein JI. Prospective evaluation of men with T1c adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 157: 2206–9 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64719-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 35 Salomon L, Levrel O, Anastasiadis AG et al. Outcome and complications of patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2002; 5: 285–90 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500605 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 36 Weldon VE, Tavel FR, Neuwirth H, Cohen R. Patterns of positive surgical margins and detectable prostate specific antigen after radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 1995; 153: 1565–9 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67462-7 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 37 Salomon L, Anastasiadis AG, Levrel O et al. Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer. Urology 2003; 61: 386–90 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02255-0 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 38 Türk I, Deger S, Winkelman B. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. technical aspects and experience with 125 cases. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 46–53 10.1159/000049748 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 39 Katz R, Salomon L, Hoznek A, De La Taille A, Antiphon P, Abbou CC. Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation. J Urol 2003; 169: 2049–52 10.1097/01.ju.0000065822.15012.b7 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 40 IUCC, International Union Against Cancer. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 5. LH Sobin, C Wittekind eds, New York: Wiley-Liss, 1997: 170–3 Google Scholar 41 Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI. Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years. J Urol 1994; 152: 1831–6 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32396-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 42 Iselin CE, Roberston JE, Paulson DF. Radical perineal prostatectomy: oncological outcome during a 20-year period. J Urol 1999; 161: 163–8 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62088-3 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 43 Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the lessons learned. J Endourol 2001; 15: 441–5 10.1089/089277901300189510 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 44 Salomon L, Levrel O, De La Taille A et al. Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approaches: twelve years' experience in one center. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 104–11 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00263-4 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 45 Geary ES, Dendinger TE, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Incontinence and vesical neck strictures following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 1995; 45: 1000–6 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80121-6 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 46 Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Rogers E et al. Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1996; 156: 1707–13 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65488-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 47 Wei JT, Montie JE. Comparison of patients' and physicians' rating of urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Semin Urol Oncol 2000; 18: 76–80 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 48 Hautman RE, Sauter TW, Wenderoth UK. Radical retropubic prostatectomy. morbidity and urinary continence in 418 consecutive cases. Urology 1994; 43: 47–51 10.1016/0090-4295(94)90218-6 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 49 Jonler M, Madsen FA, Rhodes PR, Sall M, Messing EM, Bruskewitz RC. A prospective study of quantification of urinary incontinence and quality of life in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 1996; 48: 433–40 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00216-6 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 50 Donnelan SM, Duncan HJ, MacGregor RJ, Russell JM. Prospective assessment of incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: objective and subjective analysis. Urology 1997; 49: 225–30 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00451-7 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 51 Leandri P, Rossignom G, Gautier JR, Ramon J. Radical retropubic prostatectomy. morbidity and quality of life. Experience with 620 consecutive cases. J Urol 1992; 147: 883–7 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37412-8 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 52 Zincke H, Bergstralh EJ, Blute ML et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. long-term results of 1143 patients for a single institution. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 2254–63 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.11.2254 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 53 Lu-Yao GL, Albersten P, Warren J, Yao S-L. Effect of age and surgical approach on complications and short-term mortality after radical prostatectomy – a population-based study. Urology 1999; 54: 301–7 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00100-4 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 54 Steiner MS. Continence-preserving anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 55: 427–35 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00462-8 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 55 Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker A, Burnett AL. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 55: 58–61 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00397-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 56 Gray M, Petroni GR, Theodorescu D. Urinary function after radical prostatectomy. a comparison of the retropubic and perineal approaches. Urology 1999; 53: 881 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00071-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 57 Vallencien G, Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Doublet JD. Cancer de la prostate localisé: traitement par prostatectomy radicale coelioscopique. Etude de 841 cas. Bull Acad Natl Med 2002; 186: 117–23 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 58 Abbou CC, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Urology 2000; 55: 630–03 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00502-1 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 59 Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique. An analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 2001; 166: 2101–8 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65514-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 60 Salomon L, Anastasiadis AG, Katz R et al. Urinary continence and erectile function: a prospective evaluation of functional results after radical laparoscopic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 338–43 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00360-3 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 61 Fontaine E, Izadifar V, Barthélémy Y, Desgrippes A, Beurton D. Urinary continence following radical prostatectomy assessed by a self-administered questionnaire. Eur Urol 2000; 37: 223–7 10.1159/000020122 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 62 Olsson LE, Salomon L, Nadu A et al. Prospective patient-reported continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2001; 58: 570–2 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01261-4 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 63 Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS et al. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 2000; 283: 354–60 10.1001/jama.283.3.354 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 64 Kim ED, Nath R, Slawin KM, Kadmon D, Miles BJ, Scardino PT. Bilateral nerve grafting during radical retropubic prostatectomy: extended follow-up. Urology 2001; 58: 983–7 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01403-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 65 Eden CG, Cahill D, Vass JA, Adamas TH, Dauleh MI. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; the initial UK series. BJU Int 2002; 90: 867–82 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.03049.x Web of Science®Google Scholar 66 Augustin H, Hammerer P, Graefen M et al. Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: results of a single center between 1999 and 2002. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 113–8 Google Scholar 67 Katz R, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al. Patient reported sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2002; 168: 2078–82 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64300-5 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 68 Bhayani SB, Pavlovitch CP, Hsu TS, Sullivan W, Su L-M. Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003; 61: 612–6 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02416-0 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 69 Anastasiadis A, Salomon L, Katz R, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC. Urinary continence and erectile dysfunction after radical retropubic and laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation and comparison of functional results. Urology 2003; 62: 292–7 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00352-2 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 70 Hara I, Kawabata G, Miyake H et al. Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 169: 2045–8 10.1097/01.ju.0000063961.99940.6c PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 71 Roumeguere T, Bollens R, Vanden Bossche Rochet D et al. Radical prostatectomy. a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches. World J Urol 2003; 20: 360–6 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 72 Mokulis J, Thompson I. Radical prostatectomy: is the perineal approach more difficult to learn? J Urol 1997; 157: 230–2 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65333-3 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 73 Guillonneau B, Abbou CC, Doublet JD et al. Proposal for a 'European scoring system for laparoscopic operations in urology'. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 2–6 10.1159/000049742 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 74 Gallucci M, Vincenzoni A. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a marketing or surgical strategy? Curr Opin Urol 2001; 11: 305–8 10.1097/00042307-200105000-00011 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 75 Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol 2000; 163: 418–22 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67890-1 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 76 Gill IS, Zippe CD. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28: 423–36 10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70150-6 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 77 Stolzenburgg Do M, Pfeiffer H, König F, Aedtner B, Dorsschner W. The endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and initial experiencce. World J Urol 2002; 20: 48–55 10.1007/s00345-002-0265-4 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 78 Barre C, Pocholle P, Chauveau P. Improving bladder neck division in radical retropubic prostatectomy by prior dissection of the seminal vesicles and vasa deferentia. Eur Urol 1999; 36: 107–10 10.1159/000067980 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 79 Schuessler WW, Shulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short term experience. Urology 1997; 50: 854–7 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00543-8 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 80 Jacob F, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al. Laparoscopy radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Eur Urol 2000; 37: 615–20 10.1159/000020202 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 81 Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Rozet F, Vallencien G. Prostatectomy radicale coelioscopique: première évaluation après 28 interventions. Presse Med 1998; 27: 1570–4 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 82 El-Feel A, Davis JW, Deger S et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. an analysis of factors affecting operating time. Urology 2003; 62: 314–8 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00250-4 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 83 Fabrizio MD, Tuerk I, Schellhammer PF. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: decreasing the learning curve using a mentor initiated approach. J Urol 2003; 169: 2063–5 10.1097/01.ju.0000059701.01781.e4 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 84 Abbou CC, Hozek A, Salomon L et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 2001; 165: 1964–6 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66251-9 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 85 Gettman MT, Hoznek A, Salomon L et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the extraperitoneal approach using the Da Vinci robotic system. J Urol 2003; 170: 416–9 10.1097/01.ju.0000076015.88739.a2 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 86 Tewari A, Peabody J, Sarle R, Balakrishnan AH, Shrivastava A, Menon M. Technique of Da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2002; 60: 569–72 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01852-6 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 87 Meno M, Tewari A, Peabody J and members of the VIP team. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 2003; 169: 2289–92 10.1097/01.ju.0000067464.53313.dd PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 88 Menon M, Shrivastava, Tewari A et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 2002; 168: 945–9 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64548-X PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 89 Bentas W, Wolfram M, Jones J, Bräutigam R, Kramer W. Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy: the early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 175–81 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00256-2 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 90 Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003; 170: 1738–41 10.1097/01.ju.0000092881.24608.5e PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 91 Paulson DF. Editorial comment. J Urol 2002; 167: 947 10.1016/S0022-5347(02)80306-8 Web of Science®Google Scholar 92 Schulam PG, Link RE. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2000; 18: 278–82 10.1007/PL00007077 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 93 Cadeddu JA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: is it feasible and reasonable? Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28: 655–61 10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70169-5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 94 Thüroff JW. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility studies or the future standard technique? Current Opinion Urol 2000; 10: 363–4 10.1097/00042307-200009000-00001 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 95 Radowski S, Herchorn S. Laparoscopic Burch suspension: 5 yr follow-up. J Urol 2000; 163 (Suppl.): 75 Google Scholar 96 Abdulmaaboud MR, Shokeir AA, Farage Y, Abd El-Rahman A, El-Rakhawy MM, Mutabagani H. Treatment of varicocele: a comparative study of conventional open surgery, percutaneous retrograde sclerotherapy, and laparoscopy. Urology 1998; 52: 294–300 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00178-2 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 97 Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: irrational exuberance? Urology 2001; 58: 503–8.) 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01228-6 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 98 Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Pearson JD. Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium. Urology 2001; 58: 843–8 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01441-8 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume94, Issue2July 2004Pages 244-250 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)