Towards an integrated environmental risk assessment of multiple stressors on bees: review of research projects in Europe, knowledge gaps and recommendations
2014; Wiley; Volume: 12; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3594
ISSN1831-4732
Tópico(s)Agricultural safety and regulations
ResumoEFSA JournalVolume 12, Issue 3 3594 Scientific Report of EFSAOpen Access Towards an integrated environmental risk assessment of multiple stressors on bees: review of research projects in Europe, knowledge gaps and recommendations European Food Safety Authority, European Food Safety AuthoritySearch for more papers by this author European Food Safety Authority, European Food Safety AuthoritySearch for more papers by this author First published: 13 March 2014 https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3594Citations: 26 Correspondence: [email protected] Acknowledgement: EFSA wishes to thank Edith Authié, Ryszard Laskowski and Robert Luttik for the reviewing of this report and the hearing expert: Gérard Arnold and EFSA staff: Domenica Auteri, Yann Devos, Jean-Lou Dorne, Diane Lefebvre, Tobin Robinson, Agnès Rortais, Franz Streissl, Csaba Szentes, Simon Terry, Frank Verdonck and Sybren Vos for the support provided to this scientific report. Approval date: 26 February 2014 Published date: 13 March 2014 Question number: EFSA-Q-2012-00531 On request from: EFSA AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Abstract This report reviews recent work on bee health carried out by EFSA, Member States (MSs) and the European Commission (EC). It identifies data and knowledge gaps and provides research recommendations that may facilitate the transition towards an integrated environmental risk assessment of multiple stressors on bees. The report was produced by the EFSA Bee Task Force (TF), involved representatives from six different Scientific Units, and was coordinated by the Scientific Committee and Emerging Risks Unit (SCER). The TF consulted experts from MSs and the Bee Interservice Group of the EC. Additional scientific exchanges with experts were promoted by SCER through the organisation of a scientific colloquium on bee health in May 2013. The review identified a total of 220 research projects on bee health at EU level (EFSA, 19; MSs, 181; EC, 20), and 33 additional projects from other international organisations dealing with general aspects, non-research-focused, of bee issues. A quantitative assessment of the retrieved projects revealed that research projects on multiple stressors on bees and projects on bees other than honeybees were missing, especially with regard to monitoring and testing. EFSA projects were predominantly in the area of risk assessments of pesticides on bees. Research projects on in-hive treatments and bee exposure to chemicals funded at the EC level were scarce, as were those focusing on protection goals, bee diversity and pollination services at the MS level. The qualitative assessment of the retrieved projects revealed knowledge gaps at each step of the risk assessment, which led to several recommendations for future scientific work at EFSA and research to be undertaken in the framework of Horizon 2020. Additional recommendations are given for research coordination, planning and knowledge sharing with MSs and the EC. At EFSA level, further communication, internal collaborations and training on bee health are suggested. References AFSSA (Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments), ALP (Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux), SLU (Swedish university of agricultural science) et al., 2009. Scientific report submitted to EFSA on bee mortality and bee surveillance in Europe. CFP/EFSA/AMU/2008/02. 217 pp. Alaux C, Brunet JL, Dussaubat C, Mondet F, Tchamitchan S, Cousin M, Brillard J, Baldy A, Belzunces LP and Le Conte Y, 2010. Interactions between Nosema microspores and a neonicotinoid weaken honeybees (Apis mellifera). Environmental Microbiology, 12, 774– 782. Alaux C, Dantec C, Parrinello H and Le Conte Y, 2011. Nutrigenomics in honey bees: digital gene expression analysis of pollen's nutritive effects on healthy and varroa-parasitized bees. BMC Genomics, 12, 496– 514. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-496 Bryden J, Gill RJ, Mitton RAA, Raine NE and Jansen VAA, 2013. Chronic sublethal stress causes bee colony failure. Ecology Letters, 16, 1463– 1469. Chen M, Collins EM, Tao L, and Lu C, 2013. Simultaneous determination of residues in pollen and high-fructose corn syrup from eight neonicotinoid insecticides by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 405, 9251– 9264. Comité National d'Évaluation, 1988. Méthodologie de l'évaluation. Critères et indicateurs pour l'évaluation d'un établissement d'enseignement supérieur. Bulletin du CNER, 4 pp. Comité National d'Évaluation de la Recherche, 2003. Évaluation de la recherche publique dans les établissements publics français. La Documentation française, Paris, 216 pp. Deneer JW, 2000. Toxicity of mixtures of pesticides in aquatic systems. Pest Management Science, 56, 516– 520. EC (European Commission) SCCS, SCHER, SCENIHR (Scientific Committees on consumer safety, on health and environmental risks, and on emerging and newly identified health risks), 2012. Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures. 50 pp. Available online: ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/environmental_risks/docs/scher_o_155.pdf EC (European Commission), 2013a. Evaluation of Measures for the beekeeping sector. Framework Contract No 30-CE-0219319/00-20, 170 pp. EC (European Commission), 2013b. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species, 2013/0307 (COD). ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/invasivealien/docs/proposal/en.pdf. Accessed 25 October 2013. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2006. Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to Uncertainties in Dietary Exposure Assessment. The EFSA Journal 2006, 438, 1– 54. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2006.438 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Bee Mortality and Bee Surveillance in Europe-A Report from the Assessment Methodology Unit in Response to Agence Francaise de Sécurité Alimentaire des Aliments (AFSSA). The EFSA Journal 2008, 154, 1– 28. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2009. Guidance Document on risk assessment for birds & mammals on request from EFSA. EFSA Journal 2009; 7(12):1438, 358 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1438 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2010. Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making, EFSA Journal 2010; 8(6):1637, 90 pp. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2012a. EFSA Science Strategy 2012–2016. 39 pp. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2012b. External Scientific Report on interaction between pesticides and other factors in effects on bees. Supporting Publications 2012: EN-340. 204 pp. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2012c. Inventory of EFSA's activities on bees, Supporting Publications 2012, EN-358, 89 pp. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2012d. Report on the safety analysis of oilseed rape GT73 pollen in food or as food. Supporting Publications 2012: EN-227, 7 pp. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2012e. Report on the safety analysis of oilseed rape Ms8 Rf3 pollen in food or as food. Supporting Publications 2012: EN-228, 6 pp. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013a. Editorial: EFSA calls for integrated and coordinated actions at EU and international levels to address global declines of pollinators. EFSA Journal 2013; 11(7):e11071, 3 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.e11071 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013b. EFSA Guidance Document on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees). EFSA Journal 2013; 11(7):3295, 266 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3295 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013c. Evaluation of the FERA study on bumble bees and consideration of its potential impact on the EFSA conclusions on neonicotinoids, EFSA Journal 2013; 11(6):3242, 20 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3242 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013d. International frameworks dealing with human risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals. EFSA Journal 2013; 11(7):3313, 66 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3313 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013e. Towards holistic approaches to the risk assessment of multiple stressors in bees. Summary Report of the EFSA Scientific Colloquium XVIII, Parma, Italy, 76 pp. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2014. External Scientific Report on the use of farmer/producer associations/federations to form sentinel surveillance networks for adverse events in primary production. Supporting Publications 2014: EN-543. www.efsa.europa.eu/en/search/doc/543e.pdf. 300 pp. EFSA AHAW Panel (EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare), 2013. Scientific Opinion on the risk of entry of Aethina tumida and Tropilaelaps spp. in the EU, EFSA Journal 2013; 11(3):3128, 127 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3128 EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) and EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF), 2010. Scientific Opinion on Melamine in Food and Feed. EFSA Journal 2010; 8(4):1573, 145 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1573 EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), 2010. Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal 2010; 8(11):1879, 111 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1879 EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), 2010. Guidance on a harmonised framework for pest risk assessment and the identification and evaluation of pest risk management options by EFSA. EFSA Journal 2010; 8(2):1495, 66 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1495 EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR), 2010. Scientific opinion on the development of specific protection goal options for environmental risk assessment of pesticides, in particular in relation to the revision of the Guidance Documents on Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecotoxicology (SANCO/3268/2001 and SANCO/10329/2002). EFSA Journal 2010; 8(10):1821, 55 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1821 EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR), 2012a. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues on the science behind the development of a risk assessment of Plant Protection Products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees). EFSA Journal, 10(5):2668, 275 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2668 EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR), 2012b. Guidance on the Use of Probabilistic Methodology for Modelling Dietary Exposure to Pesticide Residues. EFSA Journal 2012; 10(10):2839, 95 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2839 FAO (Food Agriculture Organization)/WHO (World Health Organization), 2008. Codex Alimentarius Commission procedural manual, 18th ed. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Codex Alimentarius Commission. ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/Publications/ProcManuals/Manual_18e.pdf. 186 pp. Fauser-Misslin A, Sadd BM, Neumann P and Sandrock C, 2013. Influence of combined pesticide and parasite exposure on bumble bee colony traits in the laboratory. Journal of Applied Ecology. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12188. Fowler JH and Aksnes DW, 2007. Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics, 72, 427– 437. Fürst MA, McMahon DP, Osborne JL, Paxton RJ and Brown MJF, 2014. Disease associations between honeybees and bumblebees as a threat to wild pollinators. Nature, 506, 364– 366. Garibaldi, LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R, Aizen MA, Bommarco R, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Carvalheiro LG, Harder LD, Afik O, Bartomeus I, Benjamin F, Boreux V, Cariveau D, Chacoff NP, Dudenhöffer JH, Freitas BM, Ghazoul J, Greenleaf S, Hipólito J, Holzschuh A, Howlett B, Isaacs R, Javorek SK, Kennedy CM, Krewenka KM, Krishnan S, Mandelik Y, Mayfield MM, Motzke I, Munyuli T, Nault BA, Otieno M, Petersen J, Pisanty G, Potts SG, Rader R, Ricketts TH, Rundlöf M, Seymour CL, Schüepp C, Szentgyörgyi H, Taki H, Tscharntke T, Vergara CH, Viana BF, Wanger TC, Westphal C, Williams N and Klein AM, 2013. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science, 339, 1608– 1611. Gauthier É, 1998. L'analyse bibliométrique de la recherche scientifique et technologique: guide méthodologique d'utilisation et d'interprétation. Observatoire des Sciences et des Technologies (CIRST), 81 pp. Gilbody SM, Song FJ, Eastwood AJ and Sutton A, 2000. The causes, consequences and detection of publication bias in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 102, 241– 249. Gill RJ, Ramos-Rodriguez O and Raine NE, 2012. Combined pesticide exposure severely affects individual- and colony-level traits in bees. Nature, 491, 105– 108. Graystock P, Yates K, Evison SEF, Darvill B, Goulson D and Hughes WOH, 2013. The Trojan hives: pollinator pathogens, imported and distributed in bumblebee colonies, Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 1207– 1215. Hawthorne DJ and Dively GP, 2011. Killing them with kindness? In-hive medications may inhibit xenobiotic efflux transporters and endanger honey bees. PLoS ONE, 6(11), e26796. INPN, 2013. Inventaire National du Patrimoine, 756 Naturel. Available online: inpn.mnhn.fr Johnson RM and Percel EG, 2013. Effect of a fungicide and spray adjuvant on queen-rearing success in honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 106, 1952– 1957. Johnson RM, Pollock HS and Berenbaum MR, 2009. Synergistic interactions between in-hive miticides in Apis mellifera. Journal of Economic Entomology, 102, 474– 479. Junghans M, Backhaus T, Faust M, Schloze M and Grimme LH, 2006. Application and validation of approaches fort he predictive hazard assessment of realistic pesticide mixtures. Aquatic Toxicology, 76, 93– 110. Kennedy, CM, Lonsdorf E, Neel MC, Williams NM, Ricketts TH, Winfree R, Bommarco M, Brittain C, Burley AL, Cariveau D, Carvalheiro LG, Chacoff NP, Cunningham SA, B.BN Danforth, Dudenhöffer J-H, Elle E, Gaines HR, L.LA Garibaldi, Gratton C, Holzschuh A, Isaacs R, Javorek SK, Jha S, Klein AM, Krewenka K, Mandelik Y, Mayfield MM, Morandin L, Neame LA, Otieno M, Park M, Potts SG, Rundlöf M, Saez A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Taki H, Viana BF, Westphal C, Wilson JK, Greenleaf SS, and Kremen C, 2013. A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems. Ecology Letters, 16, 584– 599. Keller RP, Geist J, Jeschke JM and Kühn I, 2011. Invasive species in Europe: ecology, status, and policy. Environmental Sciences Europe, 23, 23. Khoury DS, Barron AB and Myerscough MR, 2013. Modelling food and population dynamics in honey bee colonies. PLoS ONE, 8, e59084. Khoury DS, Myerscough MR and Barron AB, 2011. A quantitative model of honey bee colony population dynamics. PLoS ONE, 6, e18491. Klatt BK, Holzschuh A, Westphal C, Clough Y, Smit I, Pawelzik E and Tscharntke T, 2014. Bee pollination improves crop quality, shelf life and commercial value. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 281, 20132440. doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2440 Kortenkamp A, Backhaus T and Faust M, 2009. State of the art report on mixture toxicity. Final report, study. Contract number 070307/2007/485103/ETU/D.1. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 391 pp. Krell R, 1996. Value-added products from beekeeping. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin No. 124, www.fao.org/docrep/w0076e/w0076e30.htm. Lambert O, Piroux M, Puyo S, Thorin C, L'Hostis M, Wiest L, Buleté A, Delbac F and Pouliquen H, 2013. Widespread occurrence of chemical residues in beehive matrices from apiaries located in different landscapes of Western France. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e67007. Larcombe AN and Voss SC, 2011. Self-citation: comparison between Radiology, European Radiology and Radiology for 1997–1998. Scientometrics, 87, 347– 356. Laskowski R, Bednarska AJ, Kramarz PE, Loureiro S, Scheil V, Kudłek J and Holmstrup M, 2010. Interactions between toxic chemicals and natural environmental factors-a meta-analysis and case studies. Science of the Total Environment, 408, 3763– 3774. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.01.043. Lefebvre D, Tatry M-V, Schepers F, Rodenburg TB, Huneau-Salaün A and Allain V, 2010. TOGA: Towards an information system on broiler chicken welfare: Genetic selection aspects. External report for EFSA. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/57e.htm MA, 2005. Ecosystems and human wellbeing: Biodiversity synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA. 155 pp. Marris G, Brown M and Cuthbertson AG, 2011. GB Non-native Organism Risk Assessment Scheme for Vespa velutina nigrithorax. GB non-native species secretariat. Available online: www.nonnativespecies.org Martin SJ, Highfield AC, Brettell L, Villalobos EM, Budge GE, Powell, M, Nikaido S, Schroeder DC, 2012. Global honey bee viral landscape altered by a parasitic mite. Science, 336, 1304– 1306. Meissle M, Álvarez-Alfageme F, Malone LA and Romeis J, 2012. Establishing a database of bioecological information on non-target arthropod species to support the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops in the EU. Supporting Publications 2012:EN-334, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy [ 170 pp.]. Available from www.efsa.europa.eu/en/publications.htm Minasny B, Hartemink AE and McBratney A, 2010. Individual, country, and journal self-citation in soil science. Geoderma, 155, 434– 438. Monceau K, Bonnard O and Thiery D, 2014. Vespa velutina: a new invasive predator of honeybees in Europe. Journal of Pesticide Science, 87, 1– 16. Nienstedt KM, Brock TCM, van Wensem J, Montforts M, Hart A, Aagaard A, Alix A, Boesten J, Bopp SK, Brown C, Capri E, Forbes V, Kopp H, Liess M, Luttik R, Maltby L, Sousa JP, Streissl F and Hardy AR, 2011. Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides. Science of the Total Environment, 415, 31– 38. NRC (National Research Council), 2007. Status of Pollinators in North America. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 322 pp. NRC (National Research Council), 2009. Guidance on the treatment of uncertainties associated with PRAs in risk-informed decision making. Washington, DC. 14 pp. Available online: www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1855/v1/sr1855v1.pdf OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2010. OECD survey of pollinator testing, research, mitigation and information management: survey results. ENV/JM/MONO(2010)24, 44 pp. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2013. Test No. 237: Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Larval Toxicity Test, Single Exposure, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264203723-en Péré C and Kenis M, 2010. Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina): état des connaissances et evaluation du risque pour la Suisse. Rapport pour l'Office Fédéral de l'Environnement, CABI, 16 pp. Pettis JS, Lichtenberg EM, Andree M, Stitzinger J, Rose R and Vanengelsdorp D, 2013. Crop pollination exposes honey bees to pesticides which alters their susceptibility to the gut pathogen Nosema ceranae. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e70182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070182. Posthuma L, Traas TP, de Zwart D and Suter GW, 2002. Conceptual and technical outlook on species sensitivity distributions. In: Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Eds L Posthuma, G Suter and TP Traas. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 475– 508. Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ and Borenstein M, 2005. Chapter 1. Publication bias in meta-analysis. In: Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Eds HR Rothstein, AJ Sutton and M Borenstein. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK, 1– 7. Ruttner F, 1988. Biogeography and taxonomy of honeybees. Springer, Berlin, Germany, xii + 284 pp. Ruttner F, 1992. Naturgeschichte der Honigbienen. Ehrenwirth Verlag. Münich. Germany. 357 pp. Schine C, Kettunen M, Genovesi P, Essl F, Gollasch S, Rabitsch W, Scalera R, Starfinger U and ten Brink P, 2010. Assessment to support continued development of the EU strategy to combat invasive alien species. In: Final report for the European Commission. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Brussels. Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke Y, Ryder J, Sutton A, Hing C, Kwok C, Pang C and Harvey I, 2010. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health and Technology Assessment Journal, 14(8). doi:10.3310/hta14080. Spleen AM, Lengerich E, Rennich K, Caron D, Rose R, Pettis J, Henson M, Wilkes J, Wilson M, Stitzinger J, Lee K, Andree M, Snyder R and Vanengelsdorp D for the Bee Informed Partnership, 2013. A national survey of managed honey bee 2011-12 winter colony losses in the United States: results from the Bee Informed Partnership. Journal of Apicultural Research, 52, 44– 53. Steinhauer NA, Rennich K, Wilson ME, Caron DM, Lengerich EJ, Pettis JS, Rose R, Skinner JA, Tarpy DR, Wilkes J and Vanengelsdorp D for the Bee Informed Partnership, 2014. A national survey of managed honey bee 2012-13 annual colony losses in the USA: results from the Bee Informed Partnership. Journal of Apicultural Research, 53, 1– 18. Thompson HM and Hunt LV, 1999. Extrapolating from honeybees to bumble bees in pesticide risk assessment. Ecotoxicology, 8(3), 147– 166. US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2007. Concepts, methods and data sources for cumulative health risk assessment of multiple chemicals, exposures and effects: A resource document. EPA/600/R-06/013F, 412 pp. Vanengelsdorp D, Caron D, Hayes J, Underwood RM, Henson M, Rennich K, Spleen A, Andree M, Snyder R, Lee K, Roccasecca K, Wilson M, Wilkes J, Lengerich E and Pettis J for the Bee Informed Partnership, 2012. A national survey of managed honey bee 2010-11 winter colony losses in the USA: results from the Bee Informed Partnership. Journal of Apicultural Research, 51, 115– 124. Vanengelsdorp D, Hayes J, Underwood RM and Pettis J, 2008. Survey of honey bee colony losses in the United States, fall 2007 to spring 2008. PLoS ONE, 3, e4071. Vanengelsdorp D, Hayes J, Underwood RM and Pettis J, 2010. A survey of honey bee colony losses in the United States, fall 2008 to Spring 2009. Journal of Apicultural Research, 49, 7– 14. Vanengelsdorp D, Hayes J, Underwood RM, Caron D and Pettis J, 2011. A survey of honey bee colony losses in the USA, fall 2009 to winter 2010. Journal of Apicultural Research, 50, 1– 10. Vanengelsdorp D, Underwood R, Caron D and Hayes J, 2007. An estimate of managed colony losses in the winter of 2006–2007: A report commissioned by the apiary inspectors of America. American Bee Journal, July 2007, 5 pp. Verbruggen, EMJ and van den Brink PJ, 2010. Review of recent literature concerning mixture toxicity of pesticides to aquatic organisms. RIVM report 601400001. The National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 34 pp. Vidau C, Diogon M, Aufauvre J, Fontbonne R, Viguès B, Brunet J-L, Texier C, Biron DG, Blot N, El Aloui H, Belzunces LP and Delbac F, 2011. Exposure to sublethal doses of fipronil and thiacloprid highly increases mortality of honeybees previously infected by Nosema ceranae. PloS ONE, 6(6), e21550. Warne M St J, 2003. A Review of the ecotoxicity of mixtures, approaches to, and recommendations for, their management. In: Proceedings of the 5th national workshop on the assessment of site contamination. Eds A Langley, M Gilbey and B Kennedy. National Environment Protection Council (NEPC), Adelaide, South Australia, 253– 276. Available on www.ephc.gov.au/sites/default/files/ASC_WkshopPaper__19_Mix_Warne_Ecotoxicity_200301.pdf WHO (World Health Organization), 2008. Uncertainty and data quality in exposure assessment. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. Available online: www.inchem.org/documents/harmproj/harmproj/harmproj6.pdf Williams IH, 1994. The dependence of crop production within the European Union on pollination by honeybees. Agricultural Zoology Reviews, 6, 229– 257. References from Appendix A EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Bee Mortality and Bee Surveillance in Europe-A Report from the Assessment Methodology Unit in Response to Agence Francaise de Sécurité Alimentaire des Aliments (AFSSA). The EFSA Journal 2008, 154, 1– 28. AFSSA (Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments), ALP (Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux), SLU (Swedish university of agricultural science) et al., 2009. Scientific report submitted to EFSA on bee mortality and bee surveillance in Europe. CFP/EFSA/AMU/2008/02. 217 pp. EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR), 2012. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues on the science behind the development of a risk assessment of Plant Protection Products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees). EFSA Journal, 10(5):2668, 275 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2668 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2012. Statement on the findings in recent studies investigating sub-lethal effects in bees of some neonicotinoids in consideration of the uses currently authorised in Europe. EFSA Journal 2012; 10(6):2752, 27 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2752 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2012. Statement on the assessment of the scientific information from the Italian project "APENET" investigating effects on honeybees of coated maize seeds with some neonicotinoids and fipronil. EFSA Journal 2012; 10(6):2792, 26 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2792 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2012. External Scientific Report on interaction between pesticides and other factors in effects on bees. Supporting Publications 2012: EN-340. 204 pp. EFSA AHAW Panel (EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare), 2013. Scientific Opinion on the risk of entry of Aethina tumida and Tropilaelaps spp. in the EU. EFSA Journal 2013; 11(3):3128, 127 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3128 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for bees for the active substance thiamethoxam. EFSA Journal 2013; 11(1):3067, 68 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3067 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for bees for the active substance imidacloprid. EFSA Journal 2013; 11(1):3068, 55 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3068 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for bees for the active substance clothianidin. EFSA Journal 2013; 11(1):3066, 58 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3066 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for bees for the active substance fipronil. EFSA Journal 2013; 11(5):3158, 51 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3158 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013. Evaluation of the FERA study on bumble bees and consideration of its potential impact on the EFSA conclusions on neonicotinoids. EFSA Journal 2013; 11(6):3242, 20 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3242 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013. EFSA Guidance Document on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees). EFSA Journal 2013; 11(7):3295, 266 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3295 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2012. Inventory of EFSA's activities on bees. Supporting Publications 2012, EN-358, 89 pp. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013. Editorial: EFSA calls for integrated and coordinated actions at EU and international levels to address global declines of pollinators. EFSA Journal 2013; 11(7):e11071, 3 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.e11071 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013. Towards holistic approaches to the risk assessment of multiple stressors in bees. Summary Report of the EFSA Scientific Colloquium XVIII, Parma, Italy, 76 pp. References from Appendix F Betran AP, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Allen T and Hampson L, 2005 Effectiveness of different databases in identifying studies for systematic reviews: experience from the WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 5, 6. CEBC (Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation), 2009. Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management (version 3.1). Comité National d'Évaluation de la Recherche, 2003. Évaluation de la recherche publique dans les établissements publics français. La Documentation française, Paris. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2010. Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making. EFSA guidance for those carrying out systematic reviews. EFSA Journal 2010; 8(6):1637, 90 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1637 Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA and Pappas G, 2008. Comparison of Pub Med, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal, 22, 338– 342. Fowler JH and Aksnes DW, 2007. Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics, 72, 427– 437. Gilbody SM, Song FJ, Eastwood AJ and Sutton A, 2000. The causes, consequences and detection of publication bias in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 102, 241– 249. Gumpenberger C, Gorraiz J, Wieland M, Roche I, Schiebel E, Besagni D and Francois C, 2013. Exploring the bibliometric and semantic nature of negative results. Scientometrics, 95(1), 277– 297. Hannes K, Claes L and The Belgian Campbell Group, 2007. Learn to read and write systematic reviews: The Belgian Campbell Group. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 748– 753. J Higgins and S Green, (Eds), 2009. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available online www.cochrane-handbook.org Kawasaki JL, 2004. Agriculture Journal Literature Indexed in Life Sciences Databases. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 40. doi:10.5062/F4M61H61 Lefebvre D, Tatry M-V, Schepers F, Rodenburg TB, Huneau-Salaün A and Allain V, 2010. TOGA: Towards an information system on broiler chicken welfare: Genetic selection aspects. External report for EFSA, available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/57e.htm Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J and Moher D, 2009. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339, b2700. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG and The PRISMA Group, 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PloS Medicine, 6, e1000097. Møller AP and Jennions MD, 2001. Testing and adjusting for publication bias. Trends in Ecology and Evolution (Personal edition), 16, 580– 586. Niederstadt C and Droste S, 2010. Reporting and presenting information retrieval processes: The need for optimising common practice in health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 26, 450– 457. Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ and Borenstein M, 2005. Chapter 1. Publication bias in meta-analysis. In: Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Eds HR Rothstein, AJ Sutton and M Borenstein. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK, 1– 7. Sala SD and Brooks J, 2008. Multi-authors' self-citation: A further impact factor bias? Cortex, 44, 1139– 1145. Sergeant J, Amezcua M, Rajic A and Waddell L, 2005. A guide to conducting systematic reviews in agri-food public health. Monograph, Public Health Agency of Canada, 84 pp. Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke Y, Ryder J, Sutton A, Hing C, Kwok C, Pang C and Harvey I, 2010. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health and Technology Assessment Journal, 14(8). doi:10.3310/hta14080 Citing Literature Volume12, Issue3March 20143594 This article also appears in:Protecting bee health in Europe ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)