Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fluquinconazole
2011; Wiley; Volume: 9; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2096
ISSN1831-4732
Tópico(s)Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
ResumoEFSA JournalVolume 9, Issue 5 2096 Conclusion on PesticideOpen Access Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fluquinconazole European Food Safety Authority, European Food Safety AuthoritySearch for more papers by this author European Food Safety Authority, European Food Safety AuthoritySearch for more papers by this author First published: 11 May 2011 https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2096Citations: 2 Correspondence: pesticides.peerreview@efsa.europa.eu Published date: 11 May 2011 Question number: EFSA-Q-2010-01020 On request from: European Commission AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Ireland, 2005. Draft Assessment Report (DAR) on the active substance fluquinconazole. prepared by the rapporteur Member State Ireland in the framework of Directive 91/414/EEC, Month YYYY. Ireland, 2010. Additional Report to the Draft Assessment Report on the active substance fluquinconazole prepared by the rapporteur Member State Ireland in the framework of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, April 2010 Ireland, 2011. Final Addendum to the Additional Report on fluquinconazole, compiled by EFSA, January 2011. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2011. Peer Review Report to the conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fluquinconazole Guidance Documents European Commission, 1999. Guidelines for the generation of data concerning residues as provided in Annex II part A, section 6 and Annex III, part A, section 8 of Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, 1607/VI/97 rev.2, 10/6/1999. European Commission, 2000. Technical Material and Preparations: Guidance for generating and reporting methods of analysis in support of pre- and post-registration data requirements for Annex II (part A, Section 4) and Annex III (part A, Section 5) of Directive 91/414, SANCO/3030/99 rev.4, 11/07/00. European Commission, 2008. Guidelines on comparability, extrapolation, group tolerances and data requirements for setting MRLs. SANCO 7525/VI/95-rev.8. pp.1-38. European Commission, 2002abc. Guidance Document on Terrestrial Ecotoxicology Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/10329/2002 rev.2 final, 17 October 2002. European Commission, 2002abc. Guidance Document on Aquatic Ecotoxicology Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/3268/2001 rev 4 (final), 17 October 2002. European Commission, 2002abc. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/4145/2000. European Commission, 2003. Guidance document on assessment of the relevance of metabolites in groundwater of substances regulated under council directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/221/2000-rev 10-final, 25 February 2003. European Commission, 2004a. Guidance Document on Dermal Absorption. SANCO/222/2000 rev. 7, 19 March 2004. European Commission, 2004b. Guidance document on residue analytical methods. SANCO/825/00 REV. 7, 17/03/2004, European Commission, 2009. Guidance document on the assessment of the equivalence of technical materials of substances regulated under council directive 91/414/EEC, Sanco/10597/2003-rev. 8.1, May 2009. EFSA (2004). Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request of EFSA related to FOCUS groundwater models comparability and the consistency of this risk assessment of groundwater contamination. The EFSA Journal (2004) 93, 1– 20 EFSA (2007). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA related to the default Q10 value used to describe the temperature effect on transformation rates of pesticides in soil. The EFSA Journal (2007) 622, 1– 32 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2009. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals on request of EFSA. EFSA Journal 2009; 7(12): 1438 JMPR, 2004. Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues Rome, Italy, 20–29 September 2004, Report 2004, 383 pp. JMPR, 2007. Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues Geneva, Switzerland, 18–27 September 2007, Report 2007, 164 pp. FOCUS (2001). “FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2. 245 pp. FOCUS (2000). “FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances”. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000-rev.2. 202 pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002 FOCUS (2006). “Guidance Document on Estimating Persistence and Degradation Kinetics from Environmental Fate Studies on Pesticides in EU Registration” Report of the FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics, EC Document Reference Sanco/10058/2005 version 2.0, 434 pp OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2006. Guidance Document on Overview of Residue Chemistry Studies. ENV/JM/MONO(2006)32, 10 October 2006. SETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry), 2001. Guidance Document on Regulatory Testing and Risk Assessment procedures for Plant Protection Products with Non-Target Arthropods. ESCORT 2. Citing Literature Volume9, Issue5May 20112096 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)