Why Not NIMBY?
2014; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 17; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1080/21550085.2014.885405
ISSN2155-0085
Autores Tópico(s)Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
ResumoAbstractThis paper develops responses to several critics who commented on an earlier paper that we published in this journal (Feldman and Turner 2010). In that paper, we argued that there is nothing necessarily wrong with NIMBY claims or those who make them. The critics raised some important issues, such as whether "NIMBY" is essentially a pejorative term; the possibility that NIMBY claimants are saying something deep about the noncomparability of places; what exactly it means for policy makers to defer to a NIMBY claim; the relationship between NIMBY and environmental justice claims; and whether there is any principled way to distinguish good from bad NIMBY claims. We explore these issues further, and in the course of responding to the critics, we develop some further reasons for skepticism about the prospects for distinguishing good from bad NIMBY claims in a principled way.
Referência(s)