FDA Advisory Panel Votes to Recommend Non-Adjunctive Use of Dexcom G5 Mobile CGM
2016; Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.; Volume: 18; Issue: 8 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1089/dia.2016.07252.mr
ISSN1557-8593
Tópico(s)Pancreatic function and diabetes
ResumoDiabetes Technology & TherapeuticsVol. 18, No. 8 Meeting ReportFDA Advisory Panel Votes to Recommend Non-Adjunctive Use of Dexcom G5 Mobile CGMPublished Online:1 Aug 2016https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2016.07252.mrAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byExamining Sensor Agreement in Neural Network Blood Glucose Prediction10 June 2021 | Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Vol. 16, No. 6Continuous Glucose Monitor, Insulin Pump, and Automated Insulin Delivery Therapies for Type 1 Diabetes: An Update on Potential for Cardiovascular Benefits24 October 2022 | Current Cardiology Reports, Vol. 311Effect of divergent continuous glucose monitoring technologies on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials25 April 2022 | Diabetic Medicine, Vol. 39, No. 8Comparisons of Fifth-, Sixth-, and Seventh-Generation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems13 June 2022 | Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Vol. 13Non‐adjunctive continuous glucose monitoring for control of hypoglycaemia (COACH): Results of a post‐approval observational study23 November 2021 | Diabetic Medicine, Vol. 39, No. 2Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen® Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study9 February 2022 | Biosensors, Vol. 12, No. 2Implantable and transcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring system: a randomized cross over trial comparing accuracy, efficacy and acceptance1 July 2021 | Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, Vol. 45, No. 1Comparative Accuracy Analysis of a Real-time and an Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring System17 December 2019 | Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Vol. 15, No. 2Comparing the accuracy of transcutaneous sensor and 90-day implantable glucose sensorNutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, Vol. 31, No. 2Modeling the SMBG measurement errorThe dawn of automated insulin delivery: from promise to productArtificial intelligence-based decision support systems for diabetesPerformance and Usability of Three Systems for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Direct Comparison7 February 2019 | Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Vol. 13, No. 5Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes Dessi P. Zaharieva, Kamuran Turksoy, Sarah M. McGaugh, Rubin Pooni, Todd Vienneau, Trang Ly, and Michael C. Riddell22 May 2019 | Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, Vol. 21, No. 6Point-of-care testing in diabetes management2 May 2019 | Revista Romana de Medicina de Laborator, Vol. 27, No. 2LA PERSONA CON DIABETE TIPO 1 E LE IMMERSIONI SUBACQUEE3 March 2019 | il Diabete, Vol. 31, No. N. 1, marzo 2019Efficacy and safety of the artificial pancreas in the paediatric population with type 1 diabetes28 June 2018 | Journal of Translational Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 1ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetes technologies1 October 2018 | Pediatric Diabetes, Vol. 19Variables to Be Monitored via Biomedical Sensors for Complete Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Management: An Extension of the “On-Board” ConceptJournal of Diabetes Research, Vol. 2018Technology Advancement: Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Pump16 August 2018 | AADE in Practice, Vol. 6, No. 5The Effect of Reduced Self-Monitored Blood Glucose Testing After Adoption of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hemoglobin A1c and Time in RangeData reported previously in Price, DA, et al. (2017). Glycemic impact of reduced frequency of blood glucose monitoring with continuous glucose monitoring use. Diabetes 66(S1):A239. Sarah Puhr, Peter Calhoun, John B. Welsh, and Tomas C. Walker1 August 2018 | Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, Vol. 20, No. 8Accuracy of flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring technologies: Implications for clinical practice15 February 2018 | Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, Vol. 15, No. 3Head-to-head comparison of the accuracy of Abbott FreeStyle Libre and Dexcom G5 mobileNutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, Vol. 28, No. 4Yet Another Glucose Variability Index: Time for a Paradigm Change? Claudio Cobelli and Andrea Facchinetti1 January 2018 | Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, Vol. 20, No. 1Interstitial Glucose and Physical Exercise in Type 1 Diabetes: Integrative Physiology, Technology, and the Gap In-Between15 January 2018 | Nutrients, Vol. 10, No. 1Retrospective Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data With the Surveillance Error Grid Supports Nonadjunctive Dosing Decisions15 February 2017 | Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Vol. 11, No. 5Automated Insulin Delivery—The Light at the End of the TunnelThe Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 186Commentary Regarding Shapiro, “Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: Is It Safe?”1 March 2017 | Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Vol. 11, No. 4A Model of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Measurement Error16 March 2017 | Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Vol. 11, No. 4Replacement of Blood Glucose Measurements by Measurements With Systems for Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (rtCGM) or CGM With Intermittent Scanning (iscCGM): A German View9 July 2017 | Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Vol. 11, No. 4Modeling the Error of the Medtronic Paradigm Veo Enlite Glucose Sensor12 June 2017 | Sensors, Vol. 17, No. 6Clinical Implications of Accuracy Measurements of Continuous Glucose Sensors Timothy S. Bailey1 May 2017 | Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, Vol. 19, No. S2A Review of Safety and Hazards Associated With the Artificial PancreasIEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 10Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: Past, Present and Future Algorithmic Challenges9 December 2016 | Sensors, Vol. 16, No. 12 Volume 18Issue 8Aug 2016 InformationCopyright 2016, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:FDA Advisory Panel Votes to Recommend Non-Adjunctive Use of Dexcom G5 Mobile CGM.Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics.Aug 2016.512-516.http://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2016.07252.mrPublished in Volume: 18 Issue 8: August 1, 2016Online Ahead of Print:July 29, 2016PDF download
Referência(s)