Epicardial mapping as first intention approach for structural ventricular tachycardia ablation
2022; Oxford University Press; Volume: 24; Issue: Supplement_1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1093/europace/euac053.104
ISSN1532-2092
AutoresAna Cristina Garcia, Joaquim Soares do Brito, S Couto Pereira, P Silverio Antonio, Bruna Silva, P Alves Da Silva, C Simoes De Oliveira, Antero Martins, A Nunes-Ferreira, G Silva, L Carpinteiro, Nuno Cortez‐Dias, Fausto J. Pinto, José T. de Sousa,
Tópico(s)Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
ResumoAbstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction In several structural arrhythmogenic diseases that comprise intricate endocardial, intramural and epicardial substrates, endocardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is not sufficient and epicardial ablation has lately become a complementary and necessary tool. Purpose To evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients (pts) most suitable for first intention epicardial VT ablation. Methods Single-center prospective study of consecutive pts with structural heart disease undergoing first intention epicardial VT mapping between August 2015 and June 2021. Decision for epicardial approach was based on the etiology, VT electrocardiogram (ECG) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) results. Under general anesthesia, subxiphoid access using a Tuhoy needle was done using fluoroscopic guidance and with high-density epicardial mapping was performed. Epicardial ablation was performed if relevant arrhythmogenic findings were locally confirmed. Results First intention epicardial VT ablation was attempted in 18 pts (mean age 59.8±12 years,94% male) of whom 16 had non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM,idiopathic:11; post-myocardis:4; hereditary:1) and 2 had right ventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Mean LVEF was 33% and 79% had a previous ICD (53% in primary prevenon). 69% were referred for ablation due to arrhythmic storm (1pt in cardiogenic shock). Epicardial access was achieved in 17 pts (94%), without acute complications. In 35% pts with NICM the decision for epicardial approach was based on the detection of subepicardial CMR delayed-hyperenhancement and relevant epicardial arrhythmic substrate was confirmed by mapping in all cases. In 3 pts radiofrequency (RF) applicaons were not performed at epicardium, as no abnormal electrograms were locally detected, and an addional endocardial approach was prosecuted. The mean overall procedure and fluoroscopic time were 123 and 28min, respectively, with a mean RF application me of 51min. After the procedure 1pt required pericardial drainage due to inflammatory pericardial effusion. No other acute complications occurred. During a mean follow-up of 2.8±1.8 years, only 3pts (17%) had VT recurrence; 5pts (28%) died due to end-stage heart failure and 2pts (11%) underwent heart transplantation. Conclusion In NICM a first intention epicardial VT ablation performed by experienced operators/centers is efficient, particularly if guided by CMR findings,and presents a safety profile.
Referência(s)