Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings

2022; Oxford University Press; Volume: 26; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1093/rof/rfac033

1875-824X

Florian Berg, Julian F Kölbel, Roberto Rigobón,

Environmental Sustainability in Business

Abstract This paper investigates the divergence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings based on data from six prominent ESG rating agencies: Kinder, Lydenberg, and Domini (KLD), Sustainalytics, Moody’s ESG (Vigeo-Eiris), S&P Global (RobecoSAM), Refinitiv (Asset4), and MSCI. We document the rating divergence and map the different methodologies onto a common taxonomy of categories. Using this taxonomy, we decompose the divergence into contributions of scope, measurement, and weight. Measurement contributes 56% of the divergence, scope 38%, and weight 6%. Further analyzing the reasons for measurement divergence, we detect a rater effect where a rater’s overall view of a firm influences the measurement of specific categories. The results call for greater attention to how the data underlying ESG ratings are generated.