The use of single-stapling techniques reduces anastomotic complications in minimal-invasive rectal surgery
2022; Springer Science+Business Media; Volume: 37; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1007/s00384-022-04197-5
ISSN1432-1262
AutoresMaximilian Brunner, Alaa Zu’bi, Klaus Weber, Axel Denz, Melanie Langheinrich, Stephan Kersting, Georg F. Weber, Robert Grützmann, Christian Krautz,
Tópico(s)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
ResumoLeakage of rectal anastomoses is one of the most important and feared complications in colorectal surgery. Apart from patient-specific risk factors, technical aspects may influence the occurrence of anastomotic complications. This study investigated whether using single-stapling techniques (SST) instead of the double-stapling technique (DST) for minimal-invasive rectal anastomosis is associated with a lower rate of anastomotic complications.A retrospective review of 272 patients who received a minimally invasive stapled rectal anastomosis (3-16 cm from the anal verge) at our institution from 2015 to 2020 was performed. In 131 patients, rectal anastomosis was created by SST (SST group), while 141 patients received a rectal anastomosis with crossing stapler lines (DST group). The impact of the anastomotic technique on patient outcomes was determined by uni- and multivariate analyses.Overall anastomotic leakage rate was 6%. Patients with SST anastomoses had a lower leakage rate than patients with DST anastomoses (3% vs. 9% in the DST group, p = 0.045). The rate of anastomotic stenosis was lower in the SST group than in the DST group (1% vs. 6%, p = 0.037). Overall morbidity and mortality did not differ between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that single-stapling techniques significantly reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage (OR 3.5 [1.0-11.5], p = 0.043).The use of SST for rectal anastomosis may help to reduce anastomotic complications. This finding should be confirmed by a randomized controlled trial.
Referência(s)