Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

POS1481-HPR CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION, VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE QUIPA TOOL: TURKISH VERSION

2022; BMJ; Volume: 81; Issue: Suppl 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.3283

1468-2060

Nurten Gizem Töre, D. Oskay, H. Satiş, S. Haznedaroglu,

Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms

Background The Quality Indicators for Physiotherapy Management of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis (QUIPA) is the only patient-reported outcome measure assessing the quality indicators of physiotherapy management of hip/knee osteoarthritis (OA). It consists of 3 subscales and a total of 18 questions. Objectives The purpose of this research was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the QUIPA into the Turkish language and test its validity and reliability in Turkish-speaking patients with hip/knee OA. Methods Ninety-two patients with hip/knee OA were enrolled in the research. The QUIPA was cross-culturally adapted according to guidelines defined by Beaton et al. Participants completed QUIPA tool twice, with an interval of 7 days. Construct validity was tested via Exploratory Factor Analysis. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were determined interpreting Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, respectively. Results The Exploratory Factor Analysis demonstrated that QUIPA has 3 factors. For the first, second and third subscales and total score of QUIPA, ICC was found to be as 0.895, 0.947, 0.665, and 0.925, respectively. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was determined to be as 0.682, 0.797, 0.593, and 0.812, respectively for the first, second and third subscales and total score of QUIPA. These results indicate that Turkish version of QUIPA has excellent test-retest reliability and good internal consistency. Conclusion Turkish version of the QUIPA determined to be a valid and reliable tool to assess the quality indicators of physiotherapy management of hip/knee OA in Turkish-speaking patients. It is suggested to be used in clinical settings and researchs. References [1]Teo PL, Hinman RS, Egerton T, et al. Patient-reported quality indicators to evaluate physiotherapy care for hip and/or knee osteoarthritis-development and evaluation of the QUIPA tool. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020; 21(1):1-11. [2]Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 2000; 25(24):3186-3191. Table 1. Test-retest reliability analysis of the QUIPA QUIPA ICC 95% CI (Lower-upper bound) 1 st question 0.814 0.731-0.873 2 nd question 0.686 0.560-0.780 3 rd question 0.782 0.688-0.850 4 th question 0.655 0.521-0.758 5 th question 0.727 0.614-0.811 6 th question 0.616 0.471-0.728 7 th question 0.768 0.669-0.841 8 th question 0.631 0.490-0.739 9 th question 0.723 0.609-0.808 10 th question 0.785 0.692-0.853 11 th question 0.879 0.812-0.923 12 th question 0.772 0.674-0.843 13 th (a) question 0.842 0.770-0.892 13 th (b) question 0.752 0.615-0.845 14 th question 0.543 0.381-0.672 15 th question 0.498 0.327-0.637 16 th question 0.514 0.347-0.650 17 th question 0.866 0.804-0.909 1 st Subscale, (Q1-Q6) 0.895 0.845-0.929 2 nd Subscale, (Q7-Q13) 0.947 0.921-0.965 3 rd Subscale, (Q14-Q17) 0.665 0.534-0.765 Total 0.925 0.888-0.950 ICC: Intraclass correlation coefficient, CI: Confidence interval Disclosure of Interests None declared