Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Robot-assisted vs Open Radical Cystectomy: Randomized Controlled Trials Lights and Shadows

2022; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 209; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1097/ju.0000000000003136

1527-3792

Riccardo Mastroianni, Mario Alberto Ochoa Arvizo, Giulia Torregiani, Giuseppe Simone,

Infectious Disease Case Reports and Treatments

No AccessJournal of UrologyJU Forum1 Mar 2023Robot-assisted vs Open Radical Cystectomy: Randomized Controlled Trials Lights and Shadows Riccardo Mastroianni, Mario Alberto Ochoa Arvizo, Giulia Torregiani, and Giuseppe Simone Riccardo MastroianniRiccardo Mastroianni *Correspondence: Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00154, Rome, Italy telephone: 0652665005, +393404016868; email: E-mail Address: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3708-2209 Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy More articles by this author , Mario Alberto Ochoa ArvizoMario Alberto Ochoa Arvizo Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy More articles by this author , Giulia TorregianiGiulia Torregiani Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy More articles by this author , and Giuseppe SimoneGiuseppe Simone Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003136AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Robot-assisted vs Open Radical Cystectomy: Randomized Controlled Trials Lights and Shadows." The Journal of Urology, 209(3), pp. 460–461 References 1. . European Association of Urology guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2020 guidelines. Eur Urol. 2021; 79(1):82-104. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 2. . Robotic assisted radical cystectomy vs open radical cystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2019; 201(4):715-720. Link, Google Scholar 3. . Comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2015; 67(6):1042-1050. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 4. . The devil is in the details: randomized trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2015; 67(6):1053-1055. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 5. . Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018; 391(10139):2525-2536. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 6. . Best practices in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol. 2015; 67(3):363-375. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 7. . Outcomes of intracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol. 2018; 199(5):1302-1311. Link, Google Scholar 8. . Large single institution comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications of open radical cystectomy, intracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomy and robotic extracorporeal approach. J Urol. 2020; 203(3):512-521. Link, Google Scholar 9. . Surgical approach as a determinant factor of clinical outcome following radical cystectomy: does enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) level the playing field?Urol Oncol. 2019; 37(10):765-773. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 10. . Open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: early outcomes of a single-center randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2022; 207(5):982-992. Link, Google Scholar 11. Effect of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy on 90-day morbidity and mortality among patients with bladder cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022; 327(21):2092-2103. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar Submitted December 12, 2022; accepted December 19, 2022; published December 27, 2022. Support: None. Conflict of Interest: The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Ethics Statement: This study was deemed exempt from Institutional Review Board review. © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byCallum J and Siemens D (2023) We Should Redouble Efforts to Minimize Transfusions in Urological SurgeryJournal of Urology, VOL. 209, NO. 3, (471-473), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023. Volume 209Issue 3March 2023Page: 460-461 Peer Review Report Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Riccardo Mastroianni Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy *Correspondence: Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00154, Rome, Italy telephone: 0652665005, +393404016868; email: E-mail Address: [email protected] More articles by this author Mario Alberto Ochoa Arvizo Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy More articles by this author Giulia Torregiani Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy More articles by this author Giuseppe Simone Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy More articles by this author Expand All Submitted December 12, 2022; accepted December 19, 2022; published December 27, 2022. Support: None. Conflict of Interest: The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Ethics Statement: This study was deemed exempt from Institutional Review Board review. Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...