Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Between Duty and Passion: The Implications of a Controversial King's Policy in a Controversial Country

2022; Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava; Volume: 28; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.4316/cc.2022.02.08

2067-5860

Florin Pintescu,

Australian History and Society

went into exile on December 30, 1947, and Romania came under a communist regime.Consequently, until 1989, Romanian historiography uncritically portrayed the Hohenzollern Sigmaringen monarchy, which had ruled Romania between 1866 and 1947, exaggerating its defects and failures and utterly disputing any kind of merits.Furthermore, state censorship prevented interwar publications about the lives of Romanian monarchs, their written memoirs or those of politicians of that time.Following 1989, the role of the Romanian monarchy was critically reassessed, gradually attempting to provide an unbiased appraisal of this institution.Censorship was lifted, allowing access to archives and the publication of memoirs by Kings Carol I, Carol II, Michael I, Queen Marie and Prince Nicholas, and numerous Romanian political leaders responsible for the country's fate in the first half of the twentieth century.After the romantic era when these memoirs were regarded as "forbidden fruits" until 1989, apparently revealing only true events, a critical reconsideration of the monarchy's role in Romania, particularly of the controversial King Carol II, followed.The five volumes of the major work under consideration represent the "peak" of the recent critical reassessment of King Charles II's position and contribution to the history of Romanians and, to a limited extent, to the history of South Eastern Europe.