Pre‐operative information, shared decision‐making and consent for anaesthesia: time for a rethink
2023; Wiley; Volume: 78; Issue: 10 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/anae.16053
ISSN1365-2044
Autores Tópico(s)Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
ResumoAnaesthesiaEarly View Editorial Pre-operative information, shared decision-making and consent for anaesthesia: time for a rethink M. J. G. Ainsworth, Corresponding Author M. J. G. Ainsworth Trainee [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-1680-8517 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospitals Bath, Bath, UK Correspondence to: M. J. G. Ainsworth Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorT. M. Cook, T. M. Cook Consultant, Honorary Professor orcid.org/0000-0002-3654-497X @@doctimcook Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospitals Bath, Bath, UK University of Bristol, Bristol, UKSearch for more papers by this author M. J. G. Ainsworth, Corresponding Author M. J. G. Ainsworth Trainee [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-1680-8517 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospitals Bath, Bath, UK Correspondence to: M. J. G. Ainsworth Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorT. M. Cook, T. M. Cook Consultant, Honorary Professor orcid.org/0000-0002-3654-497X @@doctimcook Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospitals Bath, Bath, UK University of Bristol, Bristol, UKSearch for more papers by this author First published: 19 May 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16053 1 Trainee, 2 Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospitals Bath, Bath, UK 3 Honorary Professor, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References 1Chrimes N, Marshall SD. The illusion of informed consent. Anaesthesia 2018; 73: 9– 14. 2 General Medical Council. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. 2008. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/consent_guidance_contents.asp (accessed 08/09/2022). 3 Royal College of Anaesthetists. Guidelines for the provision of Anaesthesia. https://www.rcoa.ac.uk/gpas/chapter-2 (accessed 02/04/2023). 4 Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. AAGBI: consent for anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 93– 105. 5 Supreme Court. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2013-0136.html (accessed 10/05/2023). 6Lee A. 'Bolam' to 'Montgomery' is result of evolutionary change of medical practice towards 'patient-centred care'. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2017; 93: 46– 50. 7Scheer BV, Perel A, Pfeiffer UJ. Clinical review. Complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Critical Care 2002; 6: 199– 204. 8Jenkins K, Baker AB. Consent and anaesthetic risk. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 962– 84. 9Nixon J. Anaesthesia and consent: interpreting and applying new guidelines. 2017. https://mdujournal.themdu.com/issue-archive/summer-2017/anaesthesia-and-consent (accessed 12/09/2022). 10Oglesby FC, Ray AG, Shurlock T, Mitra TM, Cook TM. Litigation related to anaesthesia: analysis of claims against the NHS in England 2008–2018 and comparison against previous claim patterns. Anaesthesia 2022; 7: 527– 37. 11Wald DS, Bestwick JP, Kelly P. The effect of the Montgomery judgment on settled claims against the National Health Service due to failure to inform before giving consent to treatment. Quality Journal of Medicine 2020; 113: 721– 5. 12 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Shared decision making. [NG197]. 2021. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng197 (accessed 10/05/2023). 13 Royal College of Anaesthetists. Patient Information. https://rcoa.ac.uk/patient-information (accessed 10/05/2023). 14Zarnegar R, Brown MR, Henley M, Tidman V, Pathmanathan A. Patient perceptions and recall of consent for regional anaesthesia compared with consent for surgery. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2015; 108: 451– 6. 15Gillies A, Gillies R, Weinberg L. Patient recollections of perioperative anaesthesia risks. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2013; 41: 247– 50. 16Arrow K, Burgoyne LL, Cyna AM. Implications of nocebo in anaesthesia care. Anaesthesia 2022; 77(Suppl. 1): 11– 20. 17Inglis S, Farnill D. The effects of providing preoperative statistical anaesthetic risk information. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1993; 21: 799– 805. 18Marsman M, van den Beuken WMF, van Klei WA, Kappen TH. Autonomous patient consent for anaesthesia without preoperative consultation: a qualitative feasibility study including low-risk procedures. British Journal of Anaesthesia Open 2022; 3: 100022. 19Poswillo DE, Hopwood WA, Robson JS, et al. General Anaesthesia, Sedation and Resuscitation in Dentistry. London: Department of Health, 1990. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)