Sympathy, Simulation, and the Impartial Spectator
1995; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 105; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/293750
ISSN1539-297X
Autores Tópico(s)Free Will and Agency
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessSymposium on Empathy and EthicsSympathy, Simulation, and the Impartial SpectatorRobert M. GordonRobert M. GordonPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 105, Number 4Jul., 1995 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/293750 Views: 31Total views on this site Citations: 75Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1995 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Matteo Bianchin How can consciousness be false? Alienation, simulation, and mental ownership, Philosophy & Social Criticism 22 (Oct 2022): 019145372211315.https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537221131578Luke Roelofs Sentientism, Motivation, and Philosophical Vulcans, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 104 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12420Sarah Songhorian Adam Smith's relevance for contemporary moral cognition, Philosophical Psychology 35, no.55 (Dec 2021): 662–683.https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2021.2014442Olivia Bailey Empathy with vicious perspectives? A puzzle about the moral limits of empathetic imagination, Synthese 199, no.3-43-4 (May 2021): 9621–9647.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03219-zHannah Read Institutionalized empathy, Journal of Moral Education 13 (Oct 2021): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2021.1974364Thomas Pölzler, Norbert Paulo Thought experiments and experimental ethics, Inquiry 12 (Apr 2021): 1–29.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1916218Hannah Read Empathy and Common Ground, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24, no.22 (Apr 2021): 459–473.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10178-4Bence Nanay Vicarious representation: A new theory of social cognition, Cognition 205 (Dec 2020): 104451.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104451Nir Ben-Moshe Making sense of Smith on sympathy and approbation: other-oriented sympathy as a psychological and normative achievement, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 1 (Nov 2019): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2019.1667292Hannah Read A typology of empathy and its many moral forms, Philosophy Compass 14, no.1010 (Aug 2019).https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12623Guido Baggio Language, Behaviour, and Empathy. G.H. Mead's and W.V.O. Quine's Naturalized Theories of Meaning, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 27, no.22 (Apr 2019): 180–200.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2019.1602321Brian D. Godcharles, Jordyn D.J. Rad, Kathleen M. Heide, John K. Cochran, Eldra P. Solomon Can empathy close the racial divide and gender gap in death penalty support?, Behavioral Sciences & the Law 37, no.11 (Jan 2019): 16–37.https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2391Rae Langton , Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119, no.11 ( 2019): 77.https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoz006Bence Nanay Catharsis and vicarious fear, European Journal of Philosophy 26, no.44 (Jan 2018): 1371–1380.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12325Tommi Himberg, Julien Laroche, Romain Bigé, Megan Buchkowski, Asaf Bachrach Coordinated Interpersonal Behaviour in Collective Dance Improvisation: The Aesthetics of Kinaesthetic Togetherness, Behavioral Sciences 8, no.22 (Feb 2018): 23.https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8020023Justin Steinberg , European Journal of Philosophy 26, no.11 ( 2018): 261.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12218Elias L. Khalil Socialized view of man vs. rational choice theory: What does smith's sympathy have to say?, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 143 (Nov 2017): 223–240.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.09.003Philipp Dorstewitz Imagination in Action, Metaphilosophy 47, no.33 (Jul 2016): 385–405.https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12187David Thacher The perception of value, European Journal of Social Theory 19, no.11 (Feb 2016): 94–110.https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014567267Bence Nanay The Role of Imagination in Decision-Making, Mind & Language 31, no.11 (Feb 2016): 127–143.https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12097Yonty Friesem Empathy for the Digital Age, (Jan 2016): 21–45.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801873-6.00002-9Elias L. Khalil The Fellow-Feeling Paradox: Hume, Smith and the Moral Order, Philosophy 90, no.44 (Jul 2015): 653–678.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819115000339Matteo Bianchin Simulation and the We-Mode. A Cognitive Account of Plural First Persons, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45, no.4-54-5 (Jul 2015): 442–461.https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393115580267Barbara Mujica Lope de Vega's El castigo sin venganza : What Do Viewers Know and When Do They Know It?, Comedia Performance 12, no.11 (Apr 2015): 50–79.https://doi.org/10.5325/comeperf.12.1.050 이영재 A Study on the Concept of Sympathy in David Hume, Korean Political Science Review 48, no.44 (Sep 2014): 155–174.https://doi.org/10.18854/kpsr.2014.48.4.008Andrew F Smith Political deliberation and the challenge of bounded rationality, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 13, no.33 (May 2013): 269–291.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X13488355Matthew D. Adler EXTENDED PREFERENCES AND INTERPERSONAL COMPARISONS: A NEW ACCOUNT, Economics and Philosophy 30, no.22 (Jun 2014): 123–162.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267114000133Elisa Aaltola Varieties of Empathy and Moral Agency, Topoi 33, no.11 (Oct 2013): 243–253.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9205-8Elisa Aaltola Affective empathy as core moral agency: psychopathy, autism and reason revisited, Philosophical Explorations 17, no.11 (Aug 2013): 76–92.https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2013.825004Julien A. Deonna, Bence Nanay Simulation Versus Theory-Theory: A Plea for an Epistemological Turn, (Aug 2014): 299–311.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05146-8_20Brian Glenney Adam Smith on Sensory Perception: A Sympathetic Account, (Jan 2014): 118–135.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137321053_7Christian Lazzeri Identité et appartenance sociale, Tracés , no.#13#13 (Dec 2013): 73–102.https://doi.org/10.4000/traces.5705Jason Kawall Ideal Observer Theories, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee548Joris H. Janssen A three-component framework for empathic technologies to augment human interaction, Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 6, no.3-43-4 (Apr 2012): 143–161.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-012-0097-5Mitchell Aboulafia Through the Eyes of Mad Men, European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy III, no.22 (Dec 2011).https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.828John W. McHugh Relaxing a Tension in Adam Smith's Account of Sympathy, Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9, no.22 (Sep 2011): 189–204.https://doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2011.0015Brian Glenney Adam Smith and the Problem of the External World, Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9, no.22 (Sep 2011): 205–223.https://doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2011.0016Kenichi Minoya, Takaya Arita, Takashi Omori An artificial life approach for investigating the emergence of a Theory of Mind based on a functional model of the brain, (Apr 2011): 108–115.https://doi.org/10.1109/ALIFE.2011.5954656Jessen L. Hobson, Mark J. Mellon, Douglas E. Stevens Determinants of Moral Judgments Regarding Budgetary Slack: An Experimental Examination of Pay Scheme and Personal Values, Behavioral Research in Accounting 23, no.11 (Jan 2011): 87–107.https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2011.23.1.87Sara Dellantonio, Remo Job Morality According to a Cognitive Interpretation: A Semantic Model for Moral Behavior, (Jan 2010): 495–517.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15223-8_28TIMOTHY KRAHN, ANDREW FENTON Autism, Empathy and Questions of Moral Agency, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39, no.22 (Jun 2009): 145–166.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00402.xJessen L. Hobson, Mark J. Mellon, Douglas E. Stevens Determinants of Moral Judgments Regarding Budgetary Slack: An Experimental Examination of Pay Scheme and Personal Values, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1467042Robert M. Gordon Beyond mindreading, Philosophical Explorations 11, no.33 (Sep 2008): 219–222.https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790802239250PAUL NOORDHOF Expressive Perception as Projective Imagining, Mind & Language 23, no.33 (Jun 2008): 329–358.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.00346.xSusan Hurley The shared circuits model (SCM): How control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31, no.11 (Apr 2008): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07003123JAKOB HÅKANSSON EKLUND Empathy and viewing the other as a subject, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 47, no.55 (Oct 2006): 399–409.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00521.xAndrew Sneddon Two Views of Emotional Perception: Some Empirical Suggestions, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 32 (Jan 2020): 161–183.https://doi.org/10.1353/cjp.2007.0028Sarah Richmond Being in Others: Empathy From a Psychoanalytical Perspective, European Journal of Philosophy 12, no.22 (Aug 2004): 244–264.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0966-8373.2004.00209.xJeanette Kennett Autism, Empathy and Moral Agency, The Philosophical Quarterly 52, no.208208 (Jul 2002): 340–357.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00272Mark LeBar Simulation, theory, and emotion, Philosophical Psychology 14, no.44 (Dec 2001): 423–434.https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080120088094Caroline Gerschlager Is (Self-)Deception an Indispensable Quality of Exchange?, (Jan 2001): 27–51.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0905-9_2STEPHEN DARWALL Sympathetic Liberalism: Recent Work on Adam Smith, Philosophy Public Affairs 28, no.22 (Apr 1999): 139–164.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1999.00139.xJohn Barresi, Chris Moore Intentional relations and social understanding, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.0101 (Feb 2010): 107.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041790Colin Allen Comparative cognitive studies, not folk phylogeny, please, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 122–123.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041807Simon Baron-Cohen Can children with autism integrate first and third person representations?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 123–124.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041819Aaron Ben Ze'ev, Keith Oatley Development of social emotions and constructive agents, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 124–125.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041820Nancy Budwig, Michael Bamberg Language and its role in understanding intentional relations: Research tool or mechanism of development?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 125–126.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041832Jennifer Church An ambiguity, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 126–127.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041844Gergely Csibra, György Gergely On the dangers of oversimulation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.0101 (Feb 2010): 127.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041856Susan Dwyer Moral competence is cognitive but (perhaps) nonmodular, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 128–129.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041868Gordon G. Gallup Rhesus monkeys are radical behaviorists, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 129–129.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0004187XJuan Carlos Gomez Second person intentional relations and the evolution of social understanding, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 129–130.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041881Robert M. Gordon First person representations need a methodology based on simulation or theory, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 130–131.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041893C. M. Heyes Imagination and imitation: Input, acid test, or alchemy?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 131–132.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0004190XR. Peter Hobson Understanding minds and selves, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 132–132.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041911Robert W. Mitchell Self-knowledge, knowledge of other minds, and kinesthetic-visual matching, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 133–133.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041923Adam Morton But what is the intentional schema?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 133–134.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041935Katherine Nelson Four-year-old humans are different: Why?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 134–135.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041947David R. Olson, Bruce Homer Understanding that looking causes knowing, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 135–135.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041959Annerieke Oosterwegel Social relations and understanding the intentional self, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 136–136.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041960Daniel J. Povinelli, Mia C. Zebouni, Christopher G. Prince Ontogeny, evolution, and folk psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 137–138.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041972David Premack, Ann James Premack Intentional schema will not do the work of a theory of mind, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 138–140.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041984Vasudevi Reddy Omitting the second person in social understanding, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 140–141.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041996Carol Slater Are blind babies delayed in achieving social understanding?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 141–142.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0004200XJohn Barresi, Chris Moore Understanding self and other, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, no.11 (Feb 2010): 142–154.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00042011
Referência(s)