Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Heart transplantation as a rescue strategy for patients with refractory electrical storm

2023; Oxford University Press; Volume: 12; Issue: 9 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1093/ehjacc/zuad063

ISSN

2048-8734

Autores

Raphaël P. Martins, M. Hamel-Bougault, Francis Bessière, Mattéo Pozzi, Fabrice Extramiana, Zohra Brouk, Charles Guénancia, Audrey Sagnard, Sandro Ninni, Céline Goémine, Pascal Defaye, Aude Boignard, Baptiste Maille, Vlad Gariboldi, Pierre Baudinaud, Anne‐Céline Martin, Laure Champ‐Rigot, Katrien Blanchart, Jean‐Marc Sellal, Christian de Chillou, Katia Dyrda, Laurence Jesel-Morel, Michel Kindo, Corentin Chaumont, Frédéric Anselme, Clément Delmas, Philippe Maury, Marine Arnaud, Erwan Flécher, Karim Bénali,

Tópico(s)

Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes

Resumo

Abstract Aims Heart transplantation (HT) can be proposed as a therapeutic strategy for patients with severe refractory electrical storm (ES). Data in the literature are scarce and based on case reports. We aimed at determining the characteristics and survival of patients transplanted for refractory ES. Methods and results Patients registered on HT waiting list during the following days after ES and eventually transplanted, from 2010 to 2021, were retrospectively included in 11 French centres. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Forty-five patients were included [82% men; 55.0 (47.8–59.3) years old; 42.2% and 26.7% non-ischaemic dilated or ischaemic cardiomyopathies, respectively]. Among them, 42 (93.3%) received amiodarone, 29 received (64.4%) beta blockers, 19 (42.2%) required deep sedation, 22 had (48.9%) mechanical circulatory support, and 9 (20.0%) had radiofrequency catheter ablation. Twenty-two patients (62%) were in cardiogenic shock. Inscription on wait list and transplantation occurred 3.0 (1.0–5.0) days and 9.0 (4.0–14.0) days after ES onset, respectively. After transplantation, 20 patients (44.4%) needed immediate haemodynamic support by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In-hospital mortality rate was 28.9%. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were serum creatinine/urea levels, need for immediate post-operative ECMO support, post-operative complications, and surgical re-interventions. One-year survival was 68.9%. Conclusion Electrical storm is a rare indication of HT but may be lifesaving in those patients presenting intractable arrhythmias despite usual care. Most patients can be safely discharged from hospital, although post-operative mortality remains substantial in this context of emergency transplantation. Larger studies are warranted to precisely determine those patients at higher risk of in-hospital mortality.

Referência(s)