Produção Nacional
Revisado por pares
Diverse values of nature for sustainability
2023; Nature Portfolio; Volume: 620; Issue: 7975 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9
ISSN1476-4687
AutoresUnai Pascual, Patricia Balvanera, Christopher B. Anderson, Rebecca Chaplin‐Kramer, Mike Christie, David González-Jiménez, Adrián Martín, Christopher M. Raymond, Mette Termansen, Arild Vatn, Simone Athayde, Brigitte Baptiste, David N. Barton, Sander Jacobs, Eszter Kelemen, Ritesh Kumar, Elena Lazos, Tuyeni H. Mwampamba, Barbara Nakangu, Patrick O’Farrell, Suneetha M. Subramanian, Meine van Noordwijk, SoEun Ahn, Sacha Amaruzaman, Ariane Amin, Paola Arias‐Arévalo, Gabriela Arroyo-Robles, Mariana Cantú-Fernández, Antonio Arjona Castro, Victoria Contreras, Alta De Vos, Nicolas Dendoncker, Stefanie Engel, Uta Eser, Daniel P. Faith, Anna Filyushkina, Houda Ghazi, Erik Gómez‐Baggethun, Rachelle K. Gould, Louise Guibrunet, Haripriya Gundimeda, Thomas P. Hahn, Zuzana V. Harmáčková, Marcello Hernández‐Blanco, Andra‐Ioana Horcea‐Milcu, Mariaelena Huambachano, Natalia Lutti Hummel Wicher, Cem İskender Aydın, Mine Işlar, Ann‐Kathrin Koessler, Jasper O. Kenter, Marina Kosmus, Heera Lee, Beria Leimona, Sharachchandra Lélé, Dominic Lenzi, Bosco Lliso, Lelani Mannetti, Juliana Merçon, Ana Sofía Monroy‐Sais, Nibedita Mukherjee, Barbara Muraca, Roldán Muradian, Ranjini Murali, Sara Nelson, Gabriel R. Nemogá, Jonas Ngouhouo Poufoun, Aidin Niamir, Emmanuel Nuesiri, Tobias Ochieng Nyumba, Begüm Özkaynak, Ignacio Palomo, Ram Pandit, Agnieszka Pawłowska-Mainville, Luciana Porter‐Bolland, Martin F. Quaas, Julian Rode, Ricardo Rozzi, Sonya Sachdeva, Aibek Samakov, Marije Schaafsma, Nadia Sitas, Paula Ungar, Evonne Yiu, Yuki Yoshida, Egleé L. Zent,
Tópico(s)Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
ResumoAbstract Twenty-five years since foundational publications on valuing ecosystem services for human well-being 1,2 , addressing the global biodiversity crisis 3 still implies confronting barriers to incorporating nature’s diverse values into decision-making. These barriers include powerful interests supported by current norms and legal rules such as property rights, which determine whose values and which values of nature are acted on. A better understanding of how and why nature is (under)valued is more urgent than ever 4 . Notwithstanding agreements to incorporate nature’s values into actions, including the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) 5 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals 6 , predominant environmental and development policies still prioritize a subset of values, particularly those linked to markets, and ignore other ways people relate to and benefit from nature 7 . Arguably, a ‘values crisis’ underpins the intertwined crises of biodiversity loss and climate change 8 , pandemic emergence 9 and socio-environmental injustices 10 . On the basis of more than 50,000 scientific publications, policy documents and Indigenous and local knowledge sources, the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) assessed knowledge on nature’s diverse values and valuation methods to gain insights into their role in policymaking and fuller integration into decisions 7,11 . Applying this evidence, combinations of values-centred approaches are proposed to improve valuation and address barriers to uptake, ultimately leveraging transformative changes towards more just (that is, fair treatment of people and nature, including inter- and intragenerational equity) and sustainable futures.
Referência(s)