Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Dorado Montero’s Foreign Influences

2023; Springer International Publishing; Linguagem: Inglês

10.1007/978-3-031-46435-5_4

2198-9850

José Franco-Chasán,

Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses

The influx Dorado Montero received was varied. Essentially, he mixed a strong rationalism arising from Kant, and some other German authors, with the Italian advances in criminal anthropology (criminology) and sociology. Although the most apparent influence could be Italian, very easily seen in Dorado Montero’s first years, another significant influence can be traced to the German-speaking world. Paul Eltzbacher, Immanuel Kant, Franz von Liszt, Josef Scheicher, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Karl David August Röder, Heinrich Albert Zachariä, Friedrich Julius Stahl, Max Stirner, Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach, Fritz Schiff, Karl Christian Friedrich Krause and Georg Heinrich Schneider. The Italian group was, however, far more nurtured: Raffaele Garofalo, Scipio Sighele, Emanuele Carnevale, Francesco Nitti, Roberto Ardigò, Cesare Lombroso, Arturo Rocco, Pellegrino Rossi, Domenico Giuriati, Cesare Beccaria, Paolo Mantegazza, Enrico Morselli, Augusto Tamburini, Antonio Marro, Luigi Luciani, Angelo Mosso, Giuseppe Sergi, Napoleone Colajanni, Giuseppe Seppili, Francesco Carrara, Giovanni Carmignani, Enrico Pessina, Francesco Poletti, Michele Angelo Vaccaro, Luigi Lucchini, Enrico Ferri, Vincenzo Lilla, Ferdinando Puglia, Ugo Conti, Bernardino Alimena and Gian Domenico Romagnosi. On behalf of the rest of the influences, mainly French and English ones can be found. It cannot be said that Positivism was an exclusively Italian invention: Comte, first, and the English and the Germans afterwards, have been the leaders of this trend, and they still are. That is why the French influence was studied (Alfred Fouillée, Auguste Comte, Alfred Espinas, Gabriel Tarde and Albert Rivière). Also, there are some brief outlines on the Polish, Russian and American influences, with significant less weight. Finally, out of this scheme, a selection of the most representative authors (up to fourteen) in Dorado Montero’s though was carried out.