Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Decision‐to‐delivery interval in emergent caesarean sections: Is ‘the shorter, the better’?

2023; Wiley; Volume: 63; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/ajo.13728

1479-828X

Shigeki Matsubara,

Pregnancy-related medical research

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and GynaecologyVolume 63, Issue 6 p. 829-830 Letter to the Editor Decision-to-delivery interval in emergent caesarean sections: Is ‘the shorter, the better’? Shigeki Matsubara, Corresponding Author Shigeki Matsubara [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-4378-221X Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Koga Red Cross Hospital, Koga, Ibaraki, JapanCorrespondence: Shigeki Matsubara, Emeritus and Visiting Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Shigeki Matsubara, Corresponding Author Shigeki Matsubara [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-4378-221X Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Koga Red Cross Hospital, Koga, Ibaraki, JapanCorrespondence: Shigeki Matsubara, Emeritus and Visiting Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 22 December 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13728 Conflict of Interest: The author reports no conflict of interest. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References 1McIntyre R, Maas Z, Brenman C. Timing of emergency caesareans – what's the rush? A retrospective multi-centred observational study into decision-to-delivery interval and maternal and fetal outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2023; 63(3): 460–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13649. 10.1111/ajo.13649 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2Kawamura H, Takahashi N, Miyazaki Y et al. Impact of maternal late hospital arrival on adverse outcome of offspring affected by placental abruption: a regional multicenter nested case-control study in Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2023; 49: 1341–1347. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15579. 10.1111/jog.15579 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3Mishra N, Gupta R, Singh N. Decision delivery interval in emergency and urgent caesarean sections: need to reconsider the recommendations? J Obstet Gynaecol India 2018; 68(1): 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-0991-6. 10.1007/s13224-017-0991-6 PubMedGoogle Scholar Volume63, Issue6December 2023Pages 829-830 ReferencesRelatedInformation