Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Prioritizing Rapid Reperfusion in ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Leveraging Regionalized Systems of Care

2024; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 17; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1161/circinterventions.123.013848

1941-7632

Eugene Yuriditsky, James M. Horowitz,

Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair

HomeCirculation: Cardiovascular InterventionsVol. 17, No. 2Prioritizing Rapid Reperfusion in ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Leveraging Regionalized Systems of Care No AccessEditorialRequest AccessFull TextAboutView Full TextView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toNo AccessEditorialRequest AccessFull TextPrioritizing Rapid Reperfusion in ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Leveraging Regionalized Systems of Care Eugene Yuriditsky and James M. Horowitz Eugene YuriditskyEugene Yuriditsky Correspondence to: Eugene Yuriditsky, MD, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 530 First Ave, Skirball 9R, New York, NY 10016. Email E-mail Address: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2263-9297 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, NY. and James M. HorowitzJames M. Horowitz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8220-5434 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, NY. Originally published31 Jan 2024https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013848Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2024;17This article is a commentary on the followingReperfusion in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock and Prolonged Interhospital Transport TimesFootnotesFor Disclosures, see page 105.The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.Correspondence to: Eugene Yuriditsky, MD, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 530 First Ave, Skirball 9R, New York, NY 10016. Email eugene.yuriditsky@nyulangone.orgREFERENCES1. van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, Henry TD, Jacobs AK, Kapur NK, Kilic A, Menon V, Ohman EM, Sweitzer NK, et al; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Mission: Lifeline. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2017; 136:e232–e268. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525LinkGoogle Scholar2. Henry TD, Tomey MI, Tamis-Holland JE, Thiele H, Rao SV, Menon V, Klein DG, Naka Y, Piña IL, Kapur NK, et al; American Heart Association Interventional Cardiovascular Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology; and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. Invasive management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2021; 143:e815–e829. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000959LinkGoogle Scholar3. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A, Claeys MJ, Dan GA, Dweck MR, Galbraith M, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes: developed by the task force on the management of acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).Eur Heart J. 2023; 44:3720–3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Sanborn TA, White HD, Talley JD, Buller CE, Jacobs AK, Slater JN, Col J, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock.N Engl J Med. 1999; 341:625–634. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410901CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Vallabhajosyula S, Verghese D, Bell MR, Murphree DH, Cheungpasitporn W, Miller PE, Dunlay SM, Prasad A, Sandhu GS, Gulati R, et al. Fibrinolysis vs primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock.ESC Heart Fail. 2021; 8:2025–2035. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13281CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Bates ER, Topol EJ. Limitations of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction complicated by congestive heart failure and cardiogenic shock.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 18:1077–1084. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90770-aCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Garber PJ, Mathieson AL, Ducas J, Patton JN, Geddes JS, Prewitt RM. Thrombolytic therapy in cardiogenic shock: effect of increased aortic pressure and rapid tPA administration.Can J Cardiol. 1995; 11:30–36.MedlineGoogle Scholar8. Cantor WJ, Fitchett D, Borgundvaag B, Ducas J, Heffernan M, Cohen EA, Morrison LJ, Langer A, Dzavik V, Mehta SR, et al; TRANSFER-AMI Trial Investigators. Routine early angioplasty after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med. 2009; 360:2705–2718. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808276CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Gershlick AH, Stephens-Lloyd A, Hughes S, Abrams KR, Stevens SE, Uren NG, de Belder A, Davis J, Pitt M, Banning A, et al; REACT Trial Investigators. Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med. 2005; 353:2758–2768. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050849CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. van Diepen S, Zheng Y, Senaratne JM, Tyrrell BD, Das D, Thiele H, Henry TD, Bainey KR, Welsh RC. Reperfusion in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock and prolonged interhospital transport times.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024; 17:e013415. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013415LinkGoogle Scholar11. Kochan A, Lee T, Moghaddam N, Milley G, Singer J, Cairns JA, Wong GC, Jentzer JC, van Diepen S, Alviar C, et al. Reperfusion delays and outcomes among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with and without cardiogenic shock.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023; 16:e012810. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012810LinkGoogle Scholar12. Wong GC, Welsford M, Ainsworth C, Abuzeid W, Fordyce CB, Greene J, Huynh T, Lambert L, Le May M, Lutchmedial S, et al; Members of the Secondary Panel. 2019 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology guidelines on the acute management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: focused update on regionalization and reperfusion.Can J Cardiol. 2019; 35:107–132. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.11.031CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. Roston TM, So DY, Liu S, Fordyce CB, Grunau B, Jentzer JC, Bagai A, Luk A, Goodman SG, van Diepen S. Leveraging existing STEMI networks to regionalize cardiogenic shock systems of care: efforts to expand the scope could improve shock outcomes.Can J Cardiol. 2023; 39:427–431. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.11.005CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesReperfusion in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock and Prolonged Interhospital Transport TimesSean van Diepen, et al. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2024;17 February 2024Vol 17, Issue 2 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2024 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013848PMID: 38293832 Originally publishedJanuary 31, 2024 KeywordsEditorialsshock, cardiogenicfibrinolysismyocardial infarctionreperfusionPDF download Advertisement SubjectsCardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiac CareCatheter-Based Coronary and Valvular InterventionsRevascularization