Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Minimal clinically important change of knee flexion in people with knee osteoarthritis after non-surgical interventions using a meta-analytical approach

2024; BioMed Central; Volume: 13; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1186/s13643-023-02393-0

ISSN

2046-4053

Autores

M. Denika C. Silva, Andrew P. Woodward, A. Fearon, Diana M. Perriman, Trevor J. Spencer, Jacqui M. Couldrick, Jennie M. Scarvell,

Tópico(s)

Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

Resumo

Abstract Background Minimal clinically important change (MCIC) represents the minimum patient-perceived improvement in an outcome after treatment, in an individual or within a group over time. This study aimed to determine MCIC of knee flexion in people with knee OA after non-surgical interventions using a meta-analytical approach. Methods Four databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science and CINAHL) were searched for studies of randomised clinical trials of non-surgical interventions with intervention duration of ≤ 3 months that reported change in ( Δ ) (mean change between baseline and immediately after the intervention) knee flexion with Δ pain or Δ function measured using tools that have established MCIC values. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2). Bayesian meta-analytic models were used to determine relationships between Δ flexion with Δ pain and Δ function after non-surgical interventions and MCIC of knee flexion. Results Seventy-two studies ( k = 72, n = 5174) were eligible. Meta-analyses included 140 intervention arms ( k = 61, n = 4516) that reported Δ flexion with Δ pain using the visual analog scale (pain-VAS) and Δ function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale (function-WOMAC). Linear relationships between Δ pain at rest-VAS (0–100 mm) with Δ flexion were − 0.29 (− 0.44; − 0.15) ( β : posterior median ( CrI : credible interval)). Relationships between Δ pain during activity VAS and Δ flexion were − 0.29 (− 0.41, − 0.18), and Δ pain-general VAS and Δ flexion were − 0.33 (− 0.42, − 0.23). The relationship between Δ function-WOMAC (out of 100) and Δ flexion was − 0.15 (− 0.25, − 0.07). Increased Δ flexion was associated with decreased Δ pain-VAS and increased Δ function-WOMAC. The point estimates for MCIC of knee flexion ranged from 3.8 to 6.4°. Conclusions The estimated knee flexion MCIC values from this study are the first to be reported using a novel meta-analytical method. The novel meta-analytical method may be useful to estimate MCIC for other measures where anchor questions are problematic. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42022323927.

Referência(s)