Artigo Revisado por pares

Commentaries on “what is (quantitative) system dynamics modeling? Defining characteristics and the opportunities they create,” by Naugle et al. (2024)

2024; Wiley; Volume: 40; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/sdr.1763

ISSN

1099-1727

Autores

Tom Fiddaman, Josephine Kaviti Musango, Markus Schwaninger, Miriam Spano,

Tópico(s)

Complex Systems and Decision Making

Resumo

System Dynamics ReviewEarly View Notes and Insights Commentaries on "what is (quantitative) system dynamics modeling? Defining characteristics and the opportunities they create," by Naugle et al. (2024) This article relates to: What is (quantitative) system dynamics modeling? Defining characteristics and the opportunities they create Asmeret Naugle, Saeed Langarudi, Timothy Clancy, System Dynamics Review First Published online: February 5, 2024 Tom Fiddaman, Tom Fiddaman Ventana Systems, Bozeman, MT, USASearch for more papers by this authorJosephine Kaviti Musango, Josephine Kaviti Musango orcid.org/0000-0001-9635-0002 Graduate School of Business, University of Cape Town, 9 Portwood Road, Victoria & Alfred Waterfront, Cape Town, 8002 South AfricaSearch for more papers by this authorMarkus Schwaninger, Corresponding Author Markus Schwaninger [email protected] Institute of Management, University of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland Correspondence to: Markus Schwaninger, Institute of Management, University of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMiriam Spano, Miriam Spano Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Comments printed and commentators listed in alphabetical order.Search for more papers by this author Tom Fiddaman, Tom Fiddaman Ventana Systems, Bozeman, MT, USASearch for more papers by this authorJosephine Kaviti Musango, Josephine Kaviti Musango orcid.org/0000-0001-9635-0002 Graduate School of Business, University of Cape Town, 9 Portwood Road, Victoria & Alfred Waterfront, Cape Town, 8002 South AfricaSearch for more papers by this authorMarkus Schwaninger, Corresponding Author Markus Schwaninger [email protected] Institute of Management, University of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland Correspondence to: Markus Schwaninger, Institute of Management, University of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMiriam Spano, Miriam Spano Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Comments printed and commentators listed in alphabetical order.Search for more papers by this author First published: 12 February 2024 https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1763 Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Forrester JW. 1958. Industrial dynamics: A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review 36(4): 37–66. Web of Science®Google Scholar Forrester JW. 1961. Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press: Cambridge. Google Scholar Größler A. 2013. The 'aimless plateau': A necessary dilemma between growth and coherent identity? System Dynamics Review 29(4): 264–266. 10.1002/sdr.1509 Web of Science®Google Scholar Naugle A, Langarudi S, Clancy T. 2024. What is (quantitative) system dynamics modeling? Defining characteristics and the opportunities they create. System Dynamics Review 40 this issue. Google Scholar References Fiddaman T 2017. "Discrete Time Stinks.". Metasd blog https://metasd.com/2017/11/discrete-time-stinks/. Google Scholar Meadows D. 1976. The Unavoidable A Priori. In Proceedings of the System Dynamics Conference. Geilo: Norway. Google Scholar Mosekilde E, Larsen ER. 1988. Deterministic chaos in the beer production-distribution model. System Dynamics Review 4(1–2): 131–147. 10.1002/sdr.4260040108 Web of Science®Google Scholar Peterson DW, Eberlein RL. 1994. Reality check: A bridge between systems thinking and system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 10(2–3): 159–174. 10.1002/sdr.4260100205 Web of Science®Google Scholar Pruyt E, Kwakkel JH. 2012. A Bright Future for System Dynamics: From Art to Computational Science and Beyond. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the System Dynamics Society, St. Gallen. Retrieved October 1, 2023 from https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/2012/proceed/papers/P1394.pdf. Google Scholar Rahmandad H, Oliva R, Osgood N. 2015. Analytical Methods for Dynamic Modelers. MIT Press: Cambridge. 10.7551/mitpress/9927.001.0001 Google Scholar Richmond B. 1993. Systems thinking: Critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review 9(2): 113–133. 10.1002/sdr.4260090203 Web of Science®Google Scholar SD 1997. "System dynamics in the elevator," SD email discussion list archive. http://www.ventanasystems.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1787. Google Scholar Reference Gould JM. 1985. Artificial intelligence: A tool for system dynamics. In Proceedings of the International System Dynamics Society. Keystone, CO: System Dynamics Society. Available online: https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/1985/proceed/gould317.pdf. [Accessed 1 September 2023]. Google Scholar References Schwaninger M. 2004. Methodologies in conflict: Achieving synergies between system dynamics and organizational cybernetics. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 21(4): 1–21. 10.1002/sres.649 Web of Science®Google Scholar Schwaninger M, Grösser S. 2008. System dynamics as model-based theory building. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 25(4): 447–465. 10.1002/sres.914 Web of Science®Google Scholar References Pruyt E. 2006. What is system dynamics? A paradigmatic inquiry. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 23-27 July 2006, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. System Dynamics Society. Retrieved September 2, 2023 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228925617. Google Scholar Senge PM 2006. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. (Rev. and updated ed.). Random House. Google Scholar Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX