Editorial Acesso aberto Produção Nacional Revisado por pares

Highlighting the Benefits and Disadvantages of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis in Radiology

2024; Radiological Society of North America; Volume: 6; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1148/rycan.240018

ISSN

2638-616X

Autores

André Luiz Ferreira Costa, Sérgio Lúcio Pereira de Castro Lopes,

Tópico(s)

Radiology practices and education

Resumo

HomeRadiology: Imaging CancerVol. 6, No. 2 PreviousNext EditorialHighlighting the Benefits and Disadvantages of Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis in RadiologyAndre L. F. Costa , Sérgio L. P. C. LopesAndre L. F. Costa , Sérgio L. P. C. LopesAuthor AffiliationsFrom the Department of Dentistry, Cruzeiro do Sul University (UNICSUL), Rua Galvão Bueno 868, Liberdade, São Paulo, SP 01506-000, Brazil (A.L.F.C.); and Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, Science and Technology Institute, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil (S.L.P.C.L.).Address correspondence to A.L.F.C. (email: [email protected]).Andre L. F. Costa Sérgio L. P. C. LopesPublished Online:Mar 8 2024https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240018MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookXLinked In References1. Haidich AB. Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia 2010;14(Suppl 1):29–37. Medline, Google Scholar2. Fagard RH, Staessen JA, Thijs L. Advantages and disadvantages of the meta-analysis approach. J Hypertens 1996;14(Suppl 2):S9–S13. Crossref, Google Scholar3. Tudur Smith C, Marcucci M, Nolan SJ, et al. Individual participant data meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses based on aggregate data. Cochrane Libr 2016;9(9):MR000007. Google Scholar4. Stewart LA, Tierney JF. To IPD or not to IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data. Eval Health Prof 2002;25(1):76–97. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5. Riley RD, Lambert PC, Abo-Zaid G. Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting. BMJ 2010;340(feb05 1):c221. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6. Zwahlen M, Renehan A, Egger M. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations. Urol Oncol 2008;26(3):320–329. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7. Walker E, Hernandez AV, Kattan MW. Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations. Cleve Clin J Med 2008;75(6):431–439. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8. Veroniki AA, Seitidis G, Tsivgoulis G, Katsanos AH, Mavridis D. An introduction to individual participant data meta-analysis. Neurology 2023;100(23):1102–1110. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived: Jan 23 2024Revision requested: Feb 8 2024Revision received: Feb 8 2024Accepted: Feb 12 2024Published online: Mar 08 2024 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRecommended Articles Proposed Priorities for Low-Dose Radiation Research and Their Relevance to the Practice of RadiologyRadiology2023Volume: 309Issue: 2Radiology in the Era of Value-based Healthcare: A Multi-Society Expert Statement from the ACR, CAR, ESR, IS3R, RANZCR, and RSNARadiology2020Volume: 298Issue: 3pp. 486-491Convolutional Neural Networks for Radiologic Images: A Radiologist's GuideRadiology2019Volume: 290Issue: 3pp. 590-606Trends and Developments Shaping the Future of Diagnostic Medical Imaging: 2015 Annual Oration in Diagnostic RadiologyRadiology2016Volume: 279Issue: 3pp. 660-666Artificial Intelligence and Radiology EducationRadiology: Artificial Intelligence2022Volume: 5Issue: 1See More RSNA Education Exhibits Nothing Humerus About it: Recognizing, Preventing and Treating Radiologist ElbowDigital Posters2022The New 3D Slicer Version 5.0 Open Source Platform for Medical Image Analysis, 3D Visualization and Image-guided InterventionDigital Posters2022Not So Smart - What To Consider If You Think The AI Has Made The Wrong CallDigital Posters2021 RSNA Case Collection Obstructing ureterovesical junction calculus in pregnancyRSNA Case Collection2020Pseudoprogression with Immunotherapy Treatment RSNA Case Collection2021Clear Cell Renal Cell CarcinomaRSNA Case Collection2020 Vol. 6, No. 2 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download

Referência(s)