Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Specialization improves rectal cancer management: humans not machines determine optimal outcome

2024; Wiley; Volume: 26; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/codi.16940

1463-1318

Brendan Moran, Søren Laurberg,

Genetic factors in colorectal cancer

Colorectal DiseaseVolume 26, Issue 3 p. 405-407 EDITORIAL Specialization improves rectal cancer management: humans not machines determine optimal outcome Brendan John Moran, Corresponding Author Brendan John Moran [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-8184-2511 Colorectal Department, Basingstoke Hospital, North Hampshire Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK Correspondence Brendan John Moran, Colorectal Department, Basingstoke Hospital, North Hampshire Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, UK. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorSoren Laurberg, Soren Laurberg Aarhuis University Hospital, Aarhuis, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this author Brendan John Moran, Corresponding Author Brendan John Moran [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-8184-2511 Colorectal Department, Basingstoke Hospital, North Hampshire Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK Correspondence Brendan John Moran, Colorectal Department, Basingstoke Hospital, North Hampshire Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, UK. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorSoren Laurberg, Soren Laurberg Aarhuis University Hospital, Aarhuis, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this author First published: 29 March 2024 https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16940Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES 1Moran BJ. Surgical precision is pivotal and 'decisions are more important than incisions': two decades of pelican cancer face to face workshops. Colorectal Dis. 2021; 23: 1192–1197. Web of Science®Google Scholar 2Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982; 69: 613–616. 10.1002/bjs.1800691019 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3Engeland A, Haldorsen T, Dickman PW, Hakulinen T, Möller TR, Storm HH, et al. Relative survival of cancer patients—a comparison between Denmark and the other Nordic countries. Acta Oncol. 1998; 37(1): 49–50. 10.1080/028418698423177 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 4Bregendahl S, Bondeven P, Grønborg TK, Brown G, Laurberg S, Pedersen BG. Training of radiology specialists in local staging of primary rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective intervention study exploring the impact of various educational elements on the interpretive performance. BMJ Open Quality. 2022; 11:e001716. 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001716 PubMedGoogle Scholar 5Arnold M, Rutherford MJ, Bardot A, Ferlay J, Andersson TML, Myklebust TÅ, et al. Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995-2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20(11): 1493–1505. 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30456-5 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6Nors J, Iversen LH, Erichsen R, Gotschalck KA, Andersen CL. Incidence of recurrence and time to recurrence in stage I to III colorectal cancer: a nationwide Danish cohort study. JAMA Oncologia. 2023;e235098, online ahead of print, 10, 54. Google Scholar 7Hughes SP, Macintyre I. Surgeon-anatomist to robotic technician? The evolving role of the surgeon over three centuries. JRSM. 2022; 115(2): 460–466. 10.1177/01410768221133568 PubMedGoogle Scholar 8Moran BJ, Torkington J. The Pelican OReCO (Optimizing Rectal Cancer Outcomes) Program: in collaboration with ACPGBI: decisions, incisions, technology, Colorectal Dis, accepted for publication. Google Scholar 9 https://www.nds.ox.ac.uk/researcg/the-ideal-colloboration Google Scholar 10Maxwell-Armstrong C, Cheetham M, Branagan G, Davies J, Davies M, Eardley N, et al. Rectal cancer services—is it time for specialization within units? Colorectal Dis. 2023; 25: 1332–1335. 10.1111/codi.16572 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 11Cercek A, Lumish N, Sinopoli J, Weiss J, Shia J, Lamendola-Essel M, et al. PD1 blockade in mismatch-repair deficient locally advanced rectal cancer. NEJM. 2022; 386(25): 2363–2376. 10.1056/NEJMoa2201445 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 12Henriksen TV, Demuth C, Frydendahl A, Nors J, Nesic M, Rasmussen MH, et al. Unravelling the potential clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA in colorectal cancer-evaluation in a nationwide Danish cohort. Ann Oncol. 2024; 35: 229–239. 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.009 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 13Christensen P, Im Baeten C, Espin-Basany E, Martellucci J, Nugent KP, Zerbib F, et al. Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome—the MANUEL project. Colorectal Dis. 2021; 23: 461–465. 10.1111/codi.15517 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Volume26, Issue3March 2024Pages 405-407 ReferencesRelatedInformation