Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

How Woke Was the Symposium on Woke Organizations? An Insider Perspective

2024; Academy of Management; Volume: 38; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.5465/amp.2023.0459

1943-4529

Quinetta M. Roberson, Derek R. Avery, Angelica Leigh,

Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Academy of Management PerspectivesIn-Press ExchangeHow Woke Was the Symposium on Woke Organizations? An Insider PerspectiveQuinetta Roberson, Derek Avery and Angelica LeighQuinetta RobersonCorresponding author: Quinetta Roberson (E-mail Address: [email protected]).Michigan State University, Derek AveryUniversity of Houston and Angelica LeighDuke UniversityAccepted by Aparna JoshiPublished Online:10 Apr 2024https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2023.0459AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsDownload CitationsAdd to favoritesTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail View articleREFERENCESAcademy of Management. n.d. Submitting to Academy of Management Perspectives: Exchanges. Retrieved from https://aom.org/research/publishing-with-aom/author-resources/submitting-to-perspectives Google ScholarAcademy of Management. 2023. Academy of Management Perspectives: Revised mission statement. Retrieved from https://aom.org/research/journals/perspectives Google ScholarCarter, M., Thompson, N., Crampton, P., Morrow, G., Burford, B., Gray, C., & Illing, J. 2013. Workplace bullying in the UK NHS: A questionnaire and interview study on prevalence, impact and barriers to report. BMJ Open, 3: e002628. Google ScholarColquitt, J. A. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 386–400. Google ScholarEly, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. 2001. Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 229–273. Google ScholarFoss, N., & Klein, P. 2023. Why do companies go woke? Academy of Management Perspectives, 37: 351–367.Link , Google ScholarKalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. 2006. Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71: 589–617. Google ScholarKramare, C. 2005. Muted group theory and communication: Asking dangerous questions. Women & Language, 28: 55–61. Google ScholarKraus, M. W., Torrez, B., & Hollie, L. 2022. How narratives of racial progress create barriers to diversity, equity, and inclusion in organizations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43: 108–113. Google ScholarLau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. 2005. Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 645–659.Link , Google ScholarLeventhal, G. S. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. GergenM. GreenbergR. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: 27–55. New York: Plenum. Google ScholarMajor, B., & Crocker, J. 1993. Social stigma: The consequences of attributional ambiguity. In D. MackieD. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition and stereotyping: 345–370. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. Google ScholarMcFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. 1992. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 626–637.Link , Google ScholarOpoku-Dakwa, A., & Rice, D. B. 2023. A place for critical race theory and wokeness in diversity strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives. Forthcoming. Google ScholarOrbe, M. P. 1998. Constructing co-cultural theory: An explication of culture, power, and communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google ScholarPope, D. G., Price, J., & Wolfers, J. 2018. Awareness reduces racial bias. Management Science, 64: 4988–4995. Google ScholarRoberson, Q. M., Holmes, O. H., & Perry, J. L. 2017. Transforming research on diversity and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 11: 189–216.Link , Google ScholarRoberts, S. 2022. December 2: Dealing with diversity in psychology: Science and ideology. Retrieved from doi: 10.31234/osf.io/xk4yu Google ScholarSeijts, G. H., & Milani, K. Y. 2022. The application of leader character to building cultures of equity, diversity and inclusion. Business Horizons, 65: 573–590. Google ScholarThomason, B., Opie, T., Livingston, B., & Sitzmann, T. 2023. "Woke" diversity strategies: Science or sensationalism? Academy of Management Perspectives, 37: 193–201.Link , Google ScholarVredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A., & Kemper, J. A. 2020. Brands taking a stand: Authentic brand activism or woke washing? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39: 444–460. Google ScholarWaldman, D. A., & Sparr, J. L. 2023. Rethinking diversity strategies: An application of paradox and positive organization behavior theories. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32: 172–192. Google ScholarWright, P. M. 2023. Woke corporations and worldview: The perils of CEOs making moral proclamations from shaky moral foundations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37: 252–269.Link , Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails In-Press Permissions Metrics in the past 12 months History Published online 10 April 2024 Information© Academy of Management PerspectivesDownload PDF