Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Cooperation and competition between denitrification and chromate reduction in a hydrogen-based membrane biofilm reactor

2024; Elsevier BV; Volume: 259; Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.watres.2024.121870

1879-2448

Lijie Zhou, Fei Wu, Yongzhou Lai, Bikai Zhao, Wenyu Zhang, Bruce E. Rittmann,

Environmental remediation with nanomaterials

Competition and cooperation between denitrification and Cr(VI) reduction in a H2-based membrane biofilm reactor (H2-MBfR) were documented over 55 days of continuous operation. When nitrate (5mg N/L) and chromate (0.5mg Cr/L) were fed together, the H2-MBfR maintained approximately 100% nitrate removal and 60% chromate Cr(VI) removal, which means that nitrate outcompeted Cr(VI) for electrons from H2 oxidation. Removing nitrate from the influent led to an immediate increase in Cr(VI) removal (to 92%), but Cr(VI) removal gradually deteriorated, with the removal ratio dropping to 14% after five days. Cr(VI) removal resumed once nitrate was again added to the influent. 16S rDNA analyses showed that bacteria able to carry out H2-based denitrification and Cr(VI) reduction were in similar abundances throughout the experiment, but gene expression for Cr(VI)-reduction and export shifted. Functional genes encoding for energy-consuming chromate export (encoded by ChrA) as a means of bacterial resistance to toxicity were more abundant than genes encoding for the energy producing Cr(VI) respiration via the chromate reductase ChrR-NdFr. Thus, Cr(VI) transport and resistance to Cr(VI) toxicity depended on H2-based denitrification to supply energy. With Cr(VI) being exported from the cells, Cr(VI) reduction to Cr(III) was sustained. Thus, cooperation among H2-based denitrification, Cr(VI) export, and Cr(VI) reduction led to sustained Cr(VI) removal in the presence of nitrate, even though Cr(VI) reduction was at a competitive disadvantage for utilizing electrons from H2 oxidation.