Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Revisão Produção Nacional Revisado por pares

BIBTEX RIS

Early Postoperative Gastrointestinal Tract Evaluation: Expected Findings and Complications

2024; Radiological Society of North America; Volume: 44; Issue: 8 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1148/rg.230198

1527-1323

Daniel B. Montel, Louise L. C. Bronzeado, Igor R. C. Oliveira, Gustavo V. Araújo, Bruna B. M. Carvalho, B. SANTOS, D.M. Lima, Daniel A. Rangel, Sudhakar K. Venkatesh, Kamila Seidel Albuquerque, Fábio Lewin,

Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

HomeRadioGraphicsVol. 44, No. 8 PreviousNext Gastrointestinal ImagingRadioGraphics FundamentalsEarly Postoperative Gastrointestinal Tract Evaluation: Expected Findings and ComplicationsDaniel B. Montel , Louise L. C. Bronzeado, Igor R. C. Oliveira, Gustavo V. Araújo, Bruna B. M. Carvalho, Bárbara C. Santos, Daniel M. V. Lima, Daniel A. Rangel, Sudhakar K. Venkatesh, Kamila S. Albuquerque, Fabio LewinDaniel B. Montel , Louise L. C. Bronzeado, Igor R. C. Oliveira, Gustavo V. Araújo, Bruna B. M. Carvalho, Bárbara C. Santos, Daniel M. V. Lima, Daniel A. Rangel, Sudhakar K. Venkatesh, Kamila S. Albuquerque, Fabio LewinAuthor AffiliationsFrom the Department of Radiology, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Rua Dr Cesário Mota Júnior, 112 Vila Buarque, São Paulo, SP 01221-010, Brazil (D.B.M., L.L.C.B., I.R.C.O., G.V.A., B.B.M.C., B.C.S., D.A.R., F.L.); Department of Surgery, Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (D.M.V.L.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (S.K.V.); and Department of Radiology, Hospital Samaritano, São Paulo, Brazil (K.S.A).Address correspondence to D.B.M. (email: [email protected]).Daniel B. Montel Louise L. C. BronzeadoIgor R. C. OliveiraGustavo V. AraújoBruna B. M. CarvalhoBárbara C. SantosDaniel M. V. LimaDaniel A. RangelSudhakar K. VenkateshKamila S. AlbuquerqueFabio LewinPublished Online:Aug 1 2024https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.230198MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookXLinked In Abstract This online presentation describes imaging patterns in the early postoperative period after gastrointestinal surgery, frequent and expected findings versus postoperative complications, and optimal CT protocols.Suggested ReadingsBlachar A, Federle MP, Pealer KM, Ikramuddin S, Schauer PR. Gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: clinical and imaging findings. Radiology 2002;223(3):625–632. Google ScholarFalconi M, Pederzoli P. The relevance of gastrointestinal fistulae in clinical practice: a review. Gut 2001;49(Suppl 4):iv2–iv10. MedlineGoogle ScholarGayer G, Jonas T, Apter S, Amitai M, Shabtai M, Hertz M. Postoperative pneumoperitoneum as detected by CT: prevalence, duration, and relevant factors affecting its possible significance. Abdom Imaging 2000;25(3):301–305. MedlineGoogle ScholarKerr SF, Hyland R, Rowbotham E, Chalmers AG. Postoperative omental infarction following colonic resection. Clin Radiol 2012;67(2):134–139. MedlineGoogle ScholarLubner M, Menias C, Rucker C, et al. Blood in the belly: CT findings of hemoperitoneum. RadioGraphics 2007;27(1):109–125. Google ScholarPark EJ, Kang J, Hur H, et al. Different clinical features according to the anastomotic leakage subtypes after rectal cancer surgeries: contained vs. free leakages. PLoS One 2018;13(12):e0208572. MedlineGoogle ScholarPickhardt PJ. Positive Oral Contrast Material for Abdominal CT: Current Clinical Indications and Areas of Controversy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020;215(1):69–78. MedlineGoogle ScholarRadosa CG, Radosa JC, Laniado M, et al. Infected versus sterile abdominal fluid collections in postoperative CT: a scoring system based on clinical and imaging findings. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020;45(9):2871–2878. MedlineGoogle ScholarSamji KB, Kielar AZ, Connolly M, et al. Anastomotic Leaks After Small- and Large-Bowel Surgery: Diagnostic Performance of CT and the Importance of Intraluminal Contrast Administration. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210(6):1259–1265. MedlineGoogle ScholarTen Broek RPG, Krielen P, Di Saverio S, et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg 2018;13(1):24. MedlineGoogle ScholarWoodfield CA, Levine MS. The postoperative stomach. Eur J Radiol 2005;53(3):341–352. MedlineGoogle ScholarArticle HistoryReceived: Aug 1 2023Revision requested: Sept 25 2023Revision received: Nov 1 2023Accepted: Nov 21 2023Published online: Aug 01 2024 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsAccompanying This ArticleEarly Postoperative Gastrointestinal Tract Evaluation: Expected Findings and ComplicationsAug 1 2024Default Digital Object SeriesRecommended Articles Imaging after Pancreatic Surgery: Expected Findings and Postoperative ComplicationsRadioGraphics2023Volume: 44Issue: 1Imaging of Intestinal and Multivisceral TransplantationRadioGraphics2018Volume: 38Issue: 2pp. 413-432Extrapancreatic Advanced Endoscopic InterventionsRadioGraphics2022Volume: 42Issue: 2pp. 379-396Imaging Evaluation of Abdominopelvic Gunshot TraumaRadioGraphics2020Volume: 40Issue: 6pp. 1766-1788Esophagectomy and Gastric Pull-through Procedures: Surgical Techniques, Imaging Features, and Potential ComplicationsRadioGraphics2016Volume: 36Issue: 1pp. 107-121See More RSNA Education Exhibits Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Post-surgical Anatomy and Most Common ComplicationsDigital Posters2022Trimming the Fat: Imaging Pearls and Pitfalls Following Common and Rare Bariatric ProceduresDigital Posters2020Early Postoperative GI Tract Evaluation: From Expected Findings to ComplicationsDigital Posters2022 RSNA Case Collection Jejunal diverticulitisRSNA Case Collection2021Gastrocutaneous fistula RSNA Case Collection2021Duodenal perforationRSNA Case Collection2020 Vol. 44, No. 8 Slide PresentationMetrics Altmetric Score PDF download