Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Scandals of San Marco Understanding Scientific Prose. Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. Jack Selzer

1994; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 69; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/418652

1539-7718

Gerald Borgia,

Philosophy and History of Science

Previous articleNext article No AccessNew Biological BooksThe Scandals of San Marco Understanding Scientific Prose. Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. Jack Selzer Gerald BorgiaGerald Borgia Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Quarterly Review of Biology Volume 69, Number 3Sep., 1994 Published in association with Stony Brook University Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/418652 Views: 21Total views on this site Citations: 13Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1994 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:John Alcock Richard Lewontin and Stephen Jay Gould, (Apr 2021): 6670–6673.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_1376Alan H Krakauer Spandrels, (Apr 2021): 7820–7822.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_2171John Alcock Richard Lewontin and Stephen Jay Gould, (Dec 2017): 1–4.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1376-1Alan H. Krakauer Spandrels, (Jun 2018): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2171-1Sonya Bahar Spandrels, Exaptations, and Raw Material, (Nov 2017): 333–359.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1054-9_15John Alcock The Behavioral Sciences and Sociobiology: A Darwinian Approach, (Dec 2017): 37–59.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69123-7_3Gary L. Brase The nature of thinking, shallow and deep, Frontiers in Psychology 5 (May 2014).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00435Simon Jonathan Hampton Domain Mismatches, Scruffy Engineering, Exaptations and Spandrels, Theory & Psychology 14, no.22 (Aug 2016): 147–166.https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354304042014Gary L. Brase Ecological and evolutionary validity: Comments on Johnson-Laird, Legrenzi, Girotto, Legrenzi, and Caverni's (1999) mental-model theory of extensional reasoning., Psychological Review 109, no.44 (Jan 2002): 722–728.https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.722Bruce J. Ellis, Timothy Ketelaar On the Natural Selection of Alternative Models: Evaluation of Explanations in Evolutionary Psychology, Psychological Inquiry 11, no.11 (Nov 2009): 56–68.https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1101_03Stephen Jay Gould The exaptive excellence of spandrels as a term and prototype, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94, no.2020 (Sep 1997): 10750–10755.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.20.10750 David C. Queller The Spaniels of St. Marx and the Panglossian Paradox: A Critique of a Rhetorical Programme, The Quarterly Review of Biology 70, no.44 (Oct 2015): 485–489.https://doi.org/10.1086/419174Larry Arnhart The New Darwinian Naturalism in Political Theory, American Political Science Review 89, no.22 (Sep 2013): 389–400.https://doi.org/10.2307/2082432