Chopin, and Other Musical Essays
1889; Volume: 30; Issue: 556 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2307/3359772
ISSN2397-5326
Autores Tópico(s)Musicology and Musical Analysis
ResumoUNWeRSJTY]_^X~^C HOPIN 9 a success, because he played for their benefit, asking no pecuniary recompense.But when, some years later, he repeated his visit, and tried to play for his own pecuniary benefit, the influential friends were invisible, and the concert actually resulted in a deficit.Chopin's letters contain unmistakable evidence of the fact that, with some exceptions, the Germans did not understand his compositions.At his first concert in Vienna, he writes, " The first allegro in the F minor concerto (not intelligible to all) was indeed rewarded with * Bravo!' but I believe this was rather because the audience wished to show that they appreciated serious music than because they were able to follow and appreciate such music."And regarding the fantasia on Polish airs he says that it completely missed its mark : " There was indeed some applause by the audience, but obviously CHOPIN patted me on the shoulder every other moment, none of the other Germans knew exactly what tc make of me ;" and he adds, with his delicious irony, that " the connoisseurs could not exactly make out whether my compositions really were good or onlj seemed so."Criticisms culled from contemporary newspaper notices and other sources emphasize the fact that the Germans were at that time blind to the tran- scendent merits of Chopin's genius.The pro- fessional critics, after their usual manner, found fault with the very things which we to-day admire most in himthe exotic originality of the style, and the delightful Polish local color in which all his fabrics are " dyed in the wool," as it were.How numerous these adverse criticisms were, may best be inferred from the frequency with which Schu- mann defended Chopin in his musical paper and sneered at his detractors."It is remarkable," he writes, " that in the very droughty years preceding 1830, in which one should have thanked Heaven for every straw of superior quality, criticism, which it is true, always lags behind unless it emanates from creative minds, persisted in shrugging its shoulders at Chopin's compositions-nay, that one of them had the impudence to say that all they were good for was to be torn to pieces."In another article, after speaking in the most enthusiastic terms of I CHOPIN 11 Chopin's trio, in which "every note is music and life," he exclaims, "Wretched Berlin critic, who has no understanding for these things, and never will havepoor fellow !" And seven years later, in 1843, he writes, with fine contempt for his critical colleagues, that "for the typical reviewers Chopin never did write, anyway."And this, be it remem- bered, was only six years before Chopin's death.Not a few of the composers and composerlings of the period joined the professional critics in their de- preciation of Chopin's works.Field called his " a talent of the sick chamber." Moscheles, while admitting Chopin's originality, and the value of his pianistic achievements, confessed that he disliked his "harsh, inartistic, incomprehensible modulations," which often appeared " artificial and forced " to him-these same modulations which to-day tran- sport us into the seventh heaven of delight !Mendelssohn's attitude toward Chopin was somewhat va- cillating.He defended him in a letter against his sister's criticisms, and assured her that if she had heard some of Chopin's compositions " as he himself played them " for him, she too would have been de- lighted.He adds that Chopin had just completed " a most graceful little nocturne," of which he re- membered much, and was going to play it for his brother Paul.Nevertheless,
Referência(s)