Father's Brother's Daughter Marriage in Kurdistan

1954; University of New Mexico Press; Volume: 10; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/soutjanth.10.2.3628823

ISSN

2328-1839

Autores

Fredrik Barth,

Tópico(s)

Global Economic and Social Development

Resumo

Previous articleNext article No AccessFather's Brother's Daughter Marriage in KurdistanFredrik BarthFredrik Barth Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 10, Number 2Summer, 1954 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.10.2.3628823 Views: 6Total views on this site Citations: 63Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in the Southwestern Journal of Anthropology (1945-1972), which is continued by the Journal of Anthropological Research (1973-present). PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Umut Kuruüzüm Iraqi Kurdistan as a Capitalist Frontier, (May 2022): 29–68.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92220-7_2Béatrice Lecestre-Rollier Bibliographie, (Jan 2021): 401–410.https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pufr.21050Patrick Heady, Lale Yalçın-Heckmann Implications of Endogamy in the Southwest Eurasian Highlands: Another look at Jack Goody’s theory of production, property and kinship, History and Anthropology 31, no.22 (Aug 2019): 257–281.https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2019.1640693Hewa Haji Khedir Political Aspects of Trust and Social Networks, (Mar 2020): 83–115.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42144-1_3Richard Seaford, Robert Bostock Tragedy, Ritual and Money in Ancient Greece, 96 (Nov 2018).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316761588Francisco Freire The Hemeila Riddle: Genealogical Reconfigurations of Pre-colonial Encounters in Southwestern Mauritania, History and Anthropology 28, no.22 (Aug 2016): 149–165.https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2016.1214824Geoff Kushnick, Daniel M. T. Fessler, Fikarwin Zuska Disgust, Gender, and Social Change, Human Nature 27, no.44 (Jul 2016): 533–555.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-016-9263-xTheresa Thao Pham Engagement in knowledge production, authentication, and empowerment: A community-based participatory research project with Moroccan immigrants in Spain, International Social Work 59, no.33 (May 2016): 368–380.https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872815626994 Bibliographie, (Dec 2014): 289–318.https://doi.org/10.3917/kart.lesou.2014.01.0289Elizabeth F.S. Roberts Assisted existence: an ethnography of being in Ecuador, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19, no.33 (Aug 2013): 562–580.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12050Benjamin Reilly Revisiting Consanguineous Marriage in the Greater Middle East: Milk, Blood, and Bedouins, American Anthropologist 115, no.33 (Aug 2013): 374–387.https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12023Alain Testart Reconstructing Social and Cultural Evolution: The Case of Dowry in the Indo-European Area, Current Anthropology 54, no.11 (Jul 2015): 23–50.https://doi.org/10.1086/668679François Pouillon, Michel Mégnin Le miroir aux alouettes : destin sociologique des images du nu indigène, L'Année du Maghreb , no.VIVI (Dec 2010): 19–45.https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.796Jennifer A. Selby Marriage-partner Preference among Muslims in France: Reproducing Tradition in the Maghrebian Diaspora, Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Europe 9, no.22 (Sep 2009): 4–16.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-5823.2010.00009.xDiane E. King THE PERSONAL IS PATRILINEAL: NAMUS AS SOVEREIGNTY, Identities 15, no.33 (May 2008): 317–342.https://doi.org/10.1080/10702890802073266Ali Z. al-Zu'abi, Jisha Subin Jagdish Marriage: An Integrated Study in the Context of Cultural Variation, Digest of Middle East Studies 17, no.11 (Apr 2008): 68–91.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-3606.2008.tb00147.x Suzanne E. Joseph “Kissing Cousins” Consanguineous Marriage and Early Mortality in a Reproductive Isolate Joseph, Current Anthropology 48, no.55 (Jul 2015): 756–764.https://doi.org/10.1086/522062Diego Villar, Uma abordagem crítica do conceito de "etnicidade" na obra de Fredrik Barth, Mana 10, no.11 (Apr 2004): 165–192.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-93132004000100006SUAD JOSEPH brother/sister relationships: connectivity, love, and power in the reproduction of patriarchy in Lebanon, American Ethnologist 21, no.11 (Oct 2009): 50–73.https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1994.21.1.02a00030Nancy Wilmsen Thornhill An evolutionary analysis of rules regulating human inbreeding and marriage, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 247–261.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066449Jerome H. Barkow Evolved self-interest and the cross-cultural survey, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 261–263.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066450Stephen Beckerman The cross cultural method and the incest taboo, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 263–264.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066462Laura Betzig A little more mortar for a firm foundation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 264–264.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066474A. H. Bittles Societal stratification, consanguinity and fertility, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 264–265.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066486Ray H. Bixler Multiple causes, eye witnesses and imaginative fertility, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 265–266.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066498James F. Crow Deleterious versus beneficial effects of inbreeding, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 266–266.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066504Wim E. Crusio No evolution without genetic variation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 267–267.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066516Malcom M. Dow, Gregory B. Pollock Galton's problem for strict adaptationists, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 267–268.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066528R. I. M. Dunbar Marriage rules in perspective, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 268–269.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006653XDaniel G. Freedman On incestuous attraction and natural selection between populations, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 269–269.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066541Sam Glucksberg Rules regulating inbreeding and marriage: Evolutionary or socioeconomic?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 269–270.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066553Katherine L. Hann The nature of the data, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 270–271.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066565Michael E. Hyland What were the incest rules of the Upper Paleolithic People? Putting evolution into an evolutionary analysis, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 271–271.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066577Paul Kline Evolutionary analysis: Antithetical or irrelevant to psychoanalytic theory?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 271–272.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066589Gregory C. Leavitt Evolutionary analysis: Biological or cultural?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 272–273.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066590Frank B. Livingstone What happened to the universality of the incest taboo?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 273–273.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066607Kathleen M. MacQueen Power as a contextual variable in the analysis of human inbreeding rules, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 273–274.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066619Karin C. Meiselman Beyond the Westermarck effect: The role of denial and nurturant bonding in incest avoidance, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 274–275.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066620John Money Correlation is not causation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 275–275.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066632Jim Moore Another definition of “human” falls, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 275–276.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066644Robert A. Paul Psychoanalytic theory and incest avoidance rules, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 276–277.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066656P. A. Russell Evolutionary theories must fit the data better than other theories, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 277–278.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066668David H. Spain Muddled theory and misinterpreted data: Comments on yet another attempt to identify a so-called Westermarck effect and, in the process, to refute Freud, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 278–279.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006667XEckart Voland Rules regulating inbreeding, cultural variability and the great heuristic problem of evolutionary anthropology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 279–280.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066681Margo Wilson, Martin Daly The metaphorical extension of “incest”: A human universal?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 280–281.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00066693Nancy Wilmsen Thornhill Mental mechanisms underlying inbreeding rule making, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, no.22 (May 2011): 281–293.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006670XAlan H. Bittles, William M. Mason, Jennifer Greene, N. Appaji Rao Reproductive Behavior and Health in Consanguineous Marriages, Science 252, no.50075007 (May 1991): 789–794.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2028254Iva Bader Abramovitch, Henry Hanoch Abramovitch Enuresis in Cross-Cultural Perspective: A Comparison of Training for Elimination Control in Three Israeli Ethnic Groups, The Journal of Social Psychology 129, no.11 (Feb 1989): 47–56.https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1989.9711698Charles Lindholm Kinship Structure and Political Authority: The Middle East and Central Asia, Comparative Studies in Society and History 28, no.22 (Jun 2009): 334–355.https://doi.org/10.1017/S001041750001389XS. Atran Managing Arab kinship and marriage, Social Science Information 24, no.44 (Dec 1985): 659–696.https://doi.org/10.1177/053901885024004001BARBARA K. LARSON Tunisian kin ties reconsidered, American Ethnologist 10, no.33 (Oct 2009): 551–570.https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1983.10.3.02a00090N. E. Morton Kinship and Inbreeding in Populations of Middle Eastern Origin and Controls, (Jan 1982): 449–466.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6769-1_15Carroll McC. Pastner The Negotiation of Bilateral Endogamy in the Middle Eastern Context: The Zikri Baluch Example, Journal of Anthropological Research 37, no.44 (Sep 2015): 305–318.https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.37.4.3629830 Michel Verdon Agnatic Descent and Endogamy: A Note, Journal of Anthropological Research 37, no.33 (Sep 2015): 247–255.https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.37.3.3629726PIERRE L. VAN DEN BERGHE, GENE M. MESHER Royal incest and inclusive fitness, American Ethnologist 7, no.22 (Oct 2009): 300–317.https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1980.7.2.02a00050Ayad Al‐Qazzaz Current status of research on women in the Arab world, Middle Eastern Studies 14, no.33 (Dec 2006): 372–380.https://doi.org/10.1080/00263207808700387 Gideon M. Kressel , Qais N. Al-Nouri , Barbara C. Aswad , William T. Divale , Fadwa El Guindi , Roger Joseph , Emre Kongar , Khalil Nakhleh , Jonathan Oppenheimer , Julian Pitt-Rivers , and Basil Sansom Bride-Price Reconsidered [and Comments], Current Anthropology 18, no.33 (Oct 2015): 441–458.https://doi.org/10.1086/201926Michael E. Meeker Meaning and Society in the Near East: Examples from the Black Sea Turks and the Levatine Arabs (II), International Journal of Middle East Studies 7, no.33 (Jan 2009): 383–422.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743800025721 Arab-American Studies, Review of Middle East Studies 8, no.33 (Mar 2016): 13–26.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026318400054778William Tulio Divale Migration, External Warfare, and Matrilocal Residence, Behavior Science Research 9, no.22 (Sep 2016): 75–133.https://doi.org/10.1177/106939717400900201Richard T. Antoun Three Approaches to the Cultural Anthropology of the Middle East, Middle East Studies Association Bulletin 5, no.22 (Mar 2016): 24–53.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026318400052780W. B. Fisher The Cambridge History of Iran, (Mar 2008).https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521069359Michael M. Ripinsky MIDDLE EASTERN KINSHIP AS AN EXPRESSION OF A CULTURE-ENVIRONMENT SYSTEM, The Muslim World 58, no.33 (Jul 1968): 225–241.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.1968.tb02986.x

Referência(s)