The Weights of Chipped Stone Points: A Clue to Their Functions
1953; University of New Mexico Press; Volume: 9; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/soutjanth.9.3.3628702
ISSN2328-1839
Autores Tópico(s)Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessThe Weights of Chipped Stone Points: A Clue to Their FunctionsFranklin FenengaFranklin Fenenga Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 9, Number 3Autumn, 1953 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.9.3.3628702 Views: 7Total views on this site Citations: 45Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in the Southwestern Journal of Anthropology (1945-1972), which is continued by the Journal of Anthropological Research (1973-present). PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Erik J. Marsh, Carina Llano, Valeria Cortegoso, Silvina Castro, Lucia Yebra The bow and arrow in South America, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 69 (Mar 2023): 101471.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2022.101471Matías E. Medina, Gisela Sario, Sebastián Pastor Bone spearheads from the Late Prehispanic Period of Sierras of Cordoba (Argentina), International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 8 (May 2022).https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.3099Craig S. Smith The bow and arrow, population, environment, and seeds: Intensification in southwest Wyoming, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 62 (Jun 2021): 101300.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2021.101300Matías E. Medina, Imanol Balena Tiny Arrow Points, Bone-Tipped Projectiles, and Foraging During the Late Prehispanic Period (Sierras of Córdoba, Argentina), (Jan 2021): 33–58.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61187-3_2María Isabel González, Paula D. Escosteguy, Mónica C. Salemme, M. Magdalena Frère, Celeste Weitzel, Rodrigo Vecchi Assessing Strategies for Coypu Hunting and Use in the Salado River Depression (Buenos Aires Province, Argentina), (Jan 2021): 59–81.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61187-3_3Silvina Castro, Lucía Yebra, Valeria Cortegoso, Erik Marsh, Agustín Castillo, Agustina Rughini, María Victoria Fernández, Raven Garvey The Introduction of the Bow and Arrow Across South America’s Southern Threshold Between Food-Producing Societies and Hunter-Gatherers, (Jan 2021): 137–158.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61187-3_6Yonatan Sahle, Alison S. Brooks, Michael D. Petraglia Assessment of complex projectiles in the early Late Pleistocene at Aduma, Ethiopia, PLOS ONE 14, no.55 (May 2019): e0216716.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216716Janet Rafferty Reverse Engineering Stone Atlatl Dart Points, Lithic Technology 43, no.33 (Apr 2018): 151–165.https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2018.1462977Guillermo Heider, Diego Rivero , Latin American Antiquity 29, no.33 ( 2018): 572.https://doi.org/10.1017/laq.2018.20Enrique Alejandro Moreno Hunting Technology and Prepared Landscapes in the South-Central Andes, Lithic Technology 41, no.44 (Aug 2016): 268–292.https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2016.1207363Wallace Karl Hutchings When Is a Point a Projectile? Morphology, Impact Fractures, Scientific Rigor, and the Limits of Inference, (May 2016): 3–12.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7602-8_1Marcelo Cardillo, Jimena Alberti The evolution of projectile points and technical systems: A case from Northern Patagonian coast (Argentina), Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 2 (Jun 2015): 612–623.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2014.11.005Adam N. Rorabaugh, Tiffany J. Fulkerson TIMING OF THE INTRODUCTION OF ARROW TECHNOLOGIES IN THE SALISH SEA, NORTHWEST NORTH AMERICA, Lithic Technology 40, no.11 (Jan 2015): 21–39.https://doi.org/10.1179/2051618514Y.0000000009Jon M. Erlandson, Jack L. Watts, Nicholas P. Jew Darts, Arrows, and Archaeologists: Distinguishing Dart and Arrow Points in the Archaeological Record, American Antiquity 79, no.11 (Jan 2017): 162–169.https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.79.1.162W. Karl Hutchings Measuring use-related fracture velocity in lithic armatures to identify spears, javelins, darts, and arrows, Journal of Archaeological Science 38, no.77 (Jul 2011): 1737–1746.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.005 References, (Apr 2011): 318–323.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444390155.refsJim A. Railey Reduced Mobility or the Bow and Arrow? Another Look at “Expedient” Technologies and Sedentism, American Antiquity 75, no.22 (Jan 2017): 259–286.https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.75.2.259Nathan Stevens, Brian Codding Inferring the Function of Projectile Points from the Central Coast of Alta California, California Archaeology 1, no.11 (Jul 2013): 7–27.https://doi.org/10.1179/cal.2009.1.1.7R. Lee Lyman, Todd L. VanPool, Michael J. O’Brien The diversity of North American projectile-point types, before and after the bow and arrow, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 28, no.11 (Mar 2009): 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2008.12.002James C. Chatters A Macroevolutionary Perspective on the Archaeological Record of North America, (Aug 2009): 213–234.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0682-3_8TODD L. VANPOOL THE SURVIVAL OF ARCHAIC TECHNOLOGY IN AN AGRICULTURAL WORLD: HOW THE ATLATL AND DART ENDURED IN THE NORTH AMERICAN SOUTHWEST, KIVA 71, no.44 (Apr 2015): 429–452.https://doi.org/10.1179/kiv.2006.71.4.004John J. Shea The origins of lithic projectile point technology: evidence from Africa, the Levant, and Europe, Journal of Archaeological Science 33, no.66 (Jun 2006): 823–846.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.015Jelmer W. Eerkens, Carl P. Lipo Cultural transmission, copying errors, and the generation of variation in material culture and the archaeological record, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24, no.44 (Dec 2005): 316–334.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2005.08.001Judith F. Porcasi, Harumi Fujita The Dolphin Hunters: A Specialized Prehistoric Maritime Adaptation in the Southern California Channel Islands and Baja California, American Antiquity 65, no.33 (Jan 2017): 543–566.https://doi.org/10.2307/2694535Robert L. Bettinger, Jelmer Eerkens Point Typologies, Cultural Transmission, and the Spread of Bow-and-Arrow Technology in the Prehistoric Great Basin, American Antiquity 64, no.22 (Jan 2017): 231–242.https://doi.org/10.2307/2694276Michael S. Nassaney, Kendra Pyle The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: A View from Central Arkansas, American Antiquity 64, no.22 (Jan 2017): 243–263.https://doi.org/10.2307/2694277Jeffrey S. Couch, Tracy A. Stropes, Adella B. Schroth The Effect of Projectile Point Size on Atlatl Dart Efficiency, Lithic Technology 24, no.11 (Apr 2016): 27–37.https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.1999.11720943Nathan S. Lowrey An Ethnoarchaeological Inquiry into the Functional Relationship between Projectile Point and Armor Technologies of the Northwest Coast, North American Archaeologist 20, no.11 (Jan 1999): 47–73.https://doi.org/10.2190/YG4T-2YG1-0NWP-HTCASusan S. Hughes Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5, no.44 (Dec 1998): 345–408.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428421Heidi Knecht The History and Development of Projectile Technology Research, (Jan 1997): 3–35.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1851-2_1Robert L. Bettinger, Jeltner Eerkens Evolutionary Implications of Metrical Variation in Great Basin Projectile Points, Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 7, no.11 (Jun 2008): 177–191.https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.1997.7.1.177Michael J. Shott Stones and Shafts Redux: The Metric Discrimination of Chipped-Stone Dart and Arrow Points, American Antiquity 62, no.11 (Jan 2017): 86–101.https://doi.org/10.2307/282380Steve A. Tomka, Elton R. Prewitt “What Do I Call Thee?” Projectile Point Types and Archaeological Interpretations: Perspectives from Texas, Lithic Technology 18, no.1-21-2 (Apr 2016): 49–58.https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.1993.11720896Gail Larsen Peterkin Lithic and Organic Hunting Technology in the French Upper Palaeolithic, Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 4, no.11 (Jun 2008): 49–67.https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.1993.4.1.49Donald O. Henry, Andrew N. Garrard Tor Hamar: An Epipaleolithic Rockshelter in Southern Jordan, Palestine Exploration Quarterly 120, no.11 (Dec 2013): 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1179/peq.1988.120.1.1John H. Blitz Adoption of the Bow in Prehistoric North America, North American Archaeologist 9, no.22 (Jan 1995): 123–145.https://doi.org/10.2190/HN64-P1UD-NM0A-J0LR References, (Jan 1984): 597–704.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-506182-7.50025-2David Hurst Thomas Arrowheads and Atlatl Darts: How the Stones Got the Shaft, American Antiquity 43, no.33 (Jan 2017): 461–472.https://doi.org/10.2307/279405Stanley A. Ahler, R. Bruce McMillan Material Culture at Rodgers Shelter: A Reflection of Past Human Activities, (Jan 1976): 163–199.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-762950-6.50016-3J. D. Nance Functional Interpretations from Microscopic Analysis, American Antiquity 36, no.33 (Jan 2017): 361–366.https://doi.org/10.2307/277721Alain Testart Références bibliographiques, (): 523–536.https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionsmsh.7931Robert W. Neuman Atlatl Weights from Certain Sites on the Northern and Central Great Plains, American Antiquity 32, no.11 (Jan 2017): 36–53.https://doi.org/10.2307/278777W. Lewis Tadlock Certain Crescentic Stone Objects as a Time Marker in the Western United States, American Antiquity 31, no.5Part15Part1 (Jan 2017): 662–675.https://doi.org/10.2307/2694491Donald W. Lathrap, Dick Shutler An Archaeological Site in the High Sierra of California, American Antiquity 20, no.33 (Jan 2017): 226–240.https://doi.org/10.2307/277000Richard Page Wheeler Two New Projectile Point Types: Duncan and Hanna Points, Plains Anthropologist 1, no.11 (Nov 2017): 7–14.https://doi.org/10.1080/2052546.1954.11908164
Referência(s)