Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Doidge) Dye
2014; Wiley; Volume: 12; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3720
ISSN1831-4732
Tópico(s)Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
ResumoEFSA JournalVolume 12, Issue 6 3720 OpinionOpen Access Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Doidge) Dye EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)Search for more papers by this author EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)Search for more papers by this author First published: 16 June 2014 https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3720Citations: 9 Panel members: Richard Baker, Claude Bragard, Thierry Candresse, Gianni Gilioli, Jean-Claude Grégoire, Imre Holb, Michael John Jeger, Olia Evtimova Karadjova, Christer Magnusson, David Makowski, Charles Manceau, Maria Navajas, Trond Rafoss, Vittorio Rossi, Jan Schans, Gritta Schrader, Gregor Urek, Johan Coert van Lenteren, Irene Vloutoglou, Stephan Winter and Wopke van der Werf. Correspondence: [email protected] Acknowledgement: The Panel wishes to thank the members of the Working Group on Tomato Bacteria: Marie-Agnès Jacques, Michael John Jeger, Charles Manceau, Jan Schans, Emilio Stefani and Jan Martin van der Wolf for the preparatory work on this scientific opinion, and EFSA staff Svetla Kozelska and Tomasz Oszako for the support provided to this scientific opinion. Adoption date: 22 May 2014 Published date: 16 June 2014 Question number: EFSA-Q-2012-00808 On request from: European Commission AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Abstract The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to perform the pest categorisation for Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, which is the causal agent of bacterial spot of tomato and pepper. X. campestris pv. vesicatoria is not a single taxonomic entity, and four separate species have been described: X. vesicatoria, X. euvesicatoria, X. perforans and X. gardneri. These organisms can be accurately identified based on a range of discriminative methods. Detection methods are available for seeds. Among the four species described within X. campestris pv. vesicatoria, all except X. gardneri were reported to be present in the EU territory. The host plants (tomato and pepper) are cultivated throughout Europe and conditions are conducive to disease development in open fields in southern Europe and in greenhouses. The disease causes a range of symptoms on aerial parts of plants including fruits. Contaminated seeds and transplants are responsible for long-distance dissemination of the pathogen. Control is mainly based on prevention and exclusion. Extraction of seeds from fruit debris using fermentation and acid treatments and thermotherapy treatments were shown to be effective in reducing the bacterial load in seed lots. No methods and chemical control agents are available that effectively control xanthomonads in infected crops. Although no recent data are available on economic losses caused by these pathogens in the EU, the organisms are considered important bacterial pathogens of tomato and pepper. Infections resulting in up to 30 % losses have been reported. Xanthomonads causing bacterial spot of tomato and pepper meet all criteria defined in International Standard for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM) 21 and they also meet all ISPM 11 criteria, although X. vesicatoria, X. euvesicatoria and X. perforans are present in the EU territory. References Aiello D, Scuderi G, Vitale A, Firrao G, Polizzi G and Cirvilleri G, 2013. A pith necrosis caused by Xanthomonas perforans on tomato plants. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 137, 29– 41. Allipi AM, 1992. Histopatologia de hojas de tomate inoculadas com Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Agronomie, 12, 115– 122. Astua-Monge G, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Davis MJ, Bonas U and Jones JB, 2000a. Resistance of tomato and pepper to T3 strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria is specified by a plant –indicible avirulence gene. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions, 13, 911– 921. Astua-Monge G, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Vallejos CE, Davis MJ and Jones JB, 2000b. Xv4-AvrXv4: a new gene-for-gene interaction identified between Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria race T3 and the wild tomato relative Lycopersicon pennellii. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions, 13, 1346– 1355. Aysan Y and Sahin F, 2003. Occurrence of bacterial spot disease, caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria, on pepper in the Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Plant Pathology, 52, 781. Bashan Y, Diab S and Okon Y, 1982. Survival of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in pepper seeds and roots, in symptomless and dry leaves, in on-host plants and in the soil. Plant and Soil, 68, 161– 170. Black R, Seal S, Abubakar Z, Nono-Womdin R and Swai I, 2001. Bacterial spot (Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria) of tomato and sweet pepper in Tanzania. Plant Pathology, 50, 810. Bogatzevska N and Boneva P, 1992. Survival of Xanthomonas vesicatoria on weeds in Bulgaria. Report of the Tomato Genetic Cooperative, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 42, p. 12. Bouzar H, Jones JB, Stall RE, Hodge NC, Minsavage GV, Benedict AA and Alvarez AM, 1994. Physiological, chemical, serological and pathogenic analyses of a worldwide collection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria strains. Phytopathology, 84, 663– 671. Bouzar H, Jones JB, Stall RE, Daouzli N, Lambe R and Felix-Gastelum RC, 1996. Diversity of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in tomato and pepper fields of Mexico. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 18, 75– 77. Buonaurio R, Stravato VM and Scortichini M, 1994. Characterization of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria from Capsicum annuum L. in Italy. Plant Disease, 78, 296– 299. Buonaurio R and Stravato VM, 1992. Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Doidge) Dye su peperone in Italia central. Informatore Fitopatologico, 42, 49– 52. Cook AA and Stall RE, 1982. Distribution of races of Xanthomonas vesicatoria pathogenic on pepper. Plant Disease, 66, 388– 389. Carmo MGF, Macagnan D and Carvalho AD, 2001. Progreso da mancha bacteriana do pimentão a partir de diferentes niveis iniciais de inoculo e do emprego ou não do controle com oxicloreto de cobre. Horticultura Brasileira, 19, 210– 215. Doidge EM, 1921. A tomato canker. Annals of Applied Biology, 7, 407– 430. Dye DW, 1966. Cultural and biochemical reaction of additional Xanthomonas species. New Zealand Journal of Science, 9, 913– 919. Dye DW, 1978. Genus IX. Xanthomonas. Dowson 1939. In: A proposed nomenclature and classification for plant pathogenic bacteria. Eds JM Young, DW Dye, JF Bradbury, CG Panagopoulos and CF Robbs. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 21, 153– 177. Dye DW, Bradbury JF, Goto M, Hayward AC, Lelliott RA and Schroth M, 1980. International standards for naming pathovars of phytopathogenic bacteria and a list of pathovar names and pathotypes. Review of Plant Pathology, 59, 153– 168. EFSA PLH Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Health), 2010. Guidance on a harmonised framework for pest risk assessment and the identification and evaluation of pest risk management options by EFSA. EFSA Journal 2010; 8(2):1495, 66 pp. doi:10.2093/j.efsa.2010.1495 EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), 2013. EPPO Standards Diagnostic PM 7/110(1) Xanthomonas spp. (Xanthomonas euvesicatoria, Xanthomonas gardneri, Xanthomonas perforans, Xanthomonas vesicatoria) causing bacterial spot of tomato and sweet pepper. EPPO Bulletin, 43, 7– 20. EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), online. EPPO-PQR (Plant Quarantine Data Retrieval system). Available at: www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2004. ISPM 21: International standards for phytosanitary measures; pest risk analysis of regulated non-quarantine pests. FAO, Rome. Available at: www.ippc.int/sites/default/files/documents//1323945746_ISPM_21_2004_En_2011-11-29_Refor.pdf FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2013. ISPM 11: International standards for phytosanitary measures; Pest risk analysis for quarantine pests,. FAO, Rome. Available at: www.ippc.int/sites/default/files/documents/20140512/ispm_11_2013_en_2014-04-30_201405121523-494.65%20KB.pdf. Gardner MW and Kendrick JB, 1921. Bacterial spot of tomato. Journal of Agricultural Research, 21, 123– 156. Gardner MW and Kendrick JB, 1923. Bacterial spot of tomato and pepper. Phytopathology, 13, 307– 315. Gasi$cA K, Ivanovic MM, Ignjatov M, Calic A and Obradovic A, 2011. Isolation and characterization of Xanthomonas euvesicatoria bacteriophages. Journal of Plant Pathology, 93, 415– 423. Griesbach E, Lattauschke G, Schmidt A and Naumann K, 1988. On the occurrence of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria on pepper under glass and plastic. Nachrichtenblatt fur den pflanzenschutz in der DDR, 42, 176– 178. Grondeau C and Samson, R, 1994. A review of thermotherapy to free plant materials from pathogens, especially seeds from bacteria. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 13, 57– 75. Hamza AA, Robene-Soustrade I, Jouen E, Gagnevin L and Lefeuvre P, 2010. Genetic and pathological diversity among Xanthomonas strains responsible for bacterial spot on tomato and pepper in the Southwest Indian Ocean Region. Plant Disease, 94, 993– 999. Hartman GL and Yang CH, 1990. Occurrence of three races of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria on pepper and tomato in Taiwan. Plant Disease, 74, 252. Hayward AC and Waterson JM, 1964. Xanthomonas vesicatoria. CMI description of pathogenic fungi and bacteria No 20. CABI International, Wallingford, UK. Hildebrand DC, Palleroni NJ and Schroth MN, 1990. Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness of 24 xanthomonad strains representing 23 Xanthomonas campestris pathovars and Xanthomonas fragariae. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 68, 263– 269. Holt JJ, 1994. Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology. Lippincott William and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 787 pp. Hucorne P, 2012. The actual distribution of crops in Europe. 36 pp. Available at: www.eppo.int/PPPRODUCTS/zonal_efficacy/zonal_map.pdf Hutton SF, Scott JW, Yang W, Sim S-C, Francis DM and Jones JB, 2010. Identification of QTL associated with resistance to bacterial spot race T4 in tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 121, 1275– 1287. Ignatov AN, Kornev KP, Matveeva EV, Pekhtereva ES, Polytiko VA, Budenkov, NI and Schhad NW, 2009. Occurrence of bacterial spot and bacterial canker in the Russian Federation. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 808, 247– 249. Ignjatov M, Gasi$cA K, Ivanovi$cA M, Ševic M, Obradovic A and Miloševic M, 2010. Characterisation of Xanthomonas euvesicatoria strains pathogens of pepper in Serbia. Pesticidi i Fitomedicina, 25, 139– 149. ISF (International Seed Federation), 2011. Method for the detection of Xanthomonas . on tomato seedspp. Version 4, August 2011. 5pp. Available at: www.worldseed.org/cms/medias/file/TradeIssues/PhytosanitaryMatters/SeedHealthTesting/ISHI-Veg/Tomato_Xanthomonas_spp_010811.pdf ISF (International Seed Federation), 2013. Method for the detection of Xanthomonas spp. on pepper seed. Version 5, November 2013. 7 pp. Available at: www.worldseed.org/cms/medias/file/TradeIssues/PhytosanitaryMatters/SeedHealthTesting/ISHI-Veg/Pepper_Xanthomonas_spp_Nov_2013.pdf Jones JB and Scott JW, 1986. Hypersensitive response in tomato to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Plant Disease, 70, 337– 339. Jones JB, Pohronezny KL, Stall RE, and Jones JB, 1986. Survival of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in Florida on tomato crop residues, weeds, seeds and volunteer tomato plants. Phytopathology, 76, 430– 434. Jones JB, Woltz SS, Jones JP and Portier KL, 1991. Population dynamics of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria on tomato leaflets treated with copper bactericides. Phytopathology, 81, 714– 719. Jones JB, Stall RE, Somodi GC, Bouzar H and Hodge NC, 1995. A third tomato race of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Plant Disease, 79, 395– 398. Jones JB, Bouzar H, Somodi GC, Stall RE, Pernezny K, El-Morsy G and Scott JW, 1998. Evidence for the preemptive nature of tomato race 3 of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in Florida. Phytopathology, 88, 33– 38. Jones JB, Bouzar H, Stall RE, Almira EC, Roberts PD, Bowen PW, Sudberry J, Strickler PM and Chun J, 2000. Systematic analysis of xanthomonads (Xanthomonas spp.) associated with pepper and tomato lesions. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 50, 1211– 1219. Jones JB, Lacy GH, Bouzar H, Stall RE and Schaad NW, 2004. Reclassification of the xanthomonads associated with bacterial spot disease of tomato and pepper. Systematic Applied Microbiology, 27, 755– 762. Kennedy BW, 1979. In: Seed pathology problems in progress. Eds JT Yorinori, JB Sinclair, YR Mehta and SK Mohan. Parana, Brazil, 155– 156. Kim SH, Olson TN, Peffer ND, Nikolaeva EV, Park S and Kang S, 2010. First report of bacterial spot of tomato caused by Xanthomonas gardneri in Pennsylvania. Plant Disease, 94, 638. Koenraadt H, van Betteray B, Germain R, Hiddink G, Jones JB, Oosterhof J, Rijlaarsdam A, Roorda P and Woudt B, 2009. Development of specific primers for the molecular detection of bacterial spot of pepper and tomato. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Tomato Diseases. Eds H Saygili, F Sahin and Y. Aysan Acta Horticulturae, 808, 99– 102. Kornev KP, Matveeva EV, Pekhtereva ES, Polytiko VA, Ignatov AN, Punina NV and Schaad NW, 2009. Xanthomonas species causing bacterial spot of tomato in the Russian Federation. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 808, 243– 246. Kousik CS and Ritchie DF, 1996. Race shift in the Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria within a season in field grown pepper. Phytopathology, 86, 952– 958. Kousik CS and Ritchie DF, 1998. Response of bell pepper cultivars to bacterial spot pathogen races that individually overcome major resistance genes. Plant Disease, 82, 181– 186. Laviola C, 1965. Xanthomonas vesicatoria (Doidge) Dye su peperone (Capsicum annum L.) in Italia. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 4, 116– 120. Lecigne P, Bezert J, Mercy L, Prunet JP, Ginibre T, Garcin A, Verharghe A, Guillaume J and Manceau C, 2000. Mancozèbe, cuivre et bactérioses: resultats sur tomate, melon, noyer, vigne. Phytoma La Defence des Vegetaux, 531, 13– 16. Leite RP, Jones JB, Somodi GC, Minsavage GV and Stall RE, 1995. Detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria associated with pepper and tomato seed by DNA amplification. Plant Disease, 79, 917– 922. Lindemann J and Upper CD, 1985. Aerial dispersal of epiphytic bacteria over bean plants. Applied and Environmantal Microbiology, 50, 1229– 1232. Lopez MM, Salcedo CI and Perez MA, 1985. Caracteristicas de aislados espanoles de Corynebacterium michiganense and Xanthomonas vesicatoria. Anales del Instituto National de Investigaciones Agrarias. Serie Agricola, 28, 235– 243. Ma X, Lewis Ivey ML and Miller SA, 2011. First report of Xanthomonas gardneri causing bacterial spot of tomato in Ohio and Michigan. Plant Disease, 95, 1584. Maneva S, Bogatzevska N and Miteva E, 2009. Excess copper in soil as a factor affecting bacterial spot caused by Xanthomonas vesicatoria in tomato plants; bio-interaction between two stress factors and their influence on plants. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 31, 125– 131. Marcuzzo LL, Fernandes JMC and Becker WF, 2009. Influência da temperatura e da duração do molhamento foliar na severidade da mancha bacteriana do tomateiro. Summa Phytopathologica, 35, 229– 230. Mbega ER, Mabagala RB, Lund OS, Wulff EG and Mortensen CN, 2012. Five species of Xanthomonads associated with bacterial leaf spot symptoms in tomato from Tanzania. Plant Disease, 96, 760– 761. McGuire RG, Jones JB and Sasser M, 1982. Tween media for semiselective isolation of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria from soil and plant material. Plant Disease, 70, 887– 891. McInnes TB, Gitaitis RD, McCarter SM, Jaworski CA and Phatak SC, 1988. Airborne dispersal of bacteria in tomato and pepper transplant fields. Plant Disease, 72, 575– 579. Melgarejo P, Garcia-Jimenez J, Jordà MC, Lopez MM, Andrés MF and Duran-Vila N, 2010. Patogenos des plantas descritos en Espana, 2nd Edition. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid, Spain, 309– 310. Mitrev S, and Kovačevi$cA B, 2006. Characterisation of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria isolated from peppers in Macedonia. Journal of Plant Pathology, 88, 321– 324. Moffett MI and Croft BJ, 1983. Xanthomonas. In: Plant bacterial diseases. A diagnostic guide. Eds PC Fahy and GJ Persley. Academic Press, Waltham, Massachusetts, 189– 228. Nascimento AR, Fernandes PM, Borgews LC, Moita AW, and Quezado-Duval AM, 2013. Controle quimico da mancha-bacteriana do tomate para processamento industrial em campo. Horticultura Brasileira, 31, 15– 24. Obradovi$cA A, Mavridis A, Rudolph K, Janse JD, Arsenijevic M, Jones JB, Minsavage GV and Wang JF, 2004. Characterization and PCR-based typing of Xanthomonas campestris pv. tomato from peppers and tomatoes in Serbia. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 110, 285– 292. Palleroni NJ, Hildebrand DC, Schroth MN and Hendson M, 1993. Deoxyribonucleic acid of 21 strains of Xanthomonas species and pathovars. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 75, 441– 446. Parkinson NM, Cowie C, Heeney J and Stead DE 2009. Phylogenetic structure of Xanthomonas as determined by comparison of gyrB sequences. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 59, 264– 274. Pernezny K, Datnoff LE, Mueller T and Collins J, 1996. Losses in fresh-market tomato production in Florida due to target spot and bacterial spot and the benefits of protectant fungicides. Plant Disease, 80, 559– 563. Peterson GH, 1963. Survival of Xanthomonas vesicatoria in soil and diseased tomato plants. Phytopathology, 53, 765– 767. Pham HT, Riu KZ, Janf KM, Cho SK and Cho M, 2004. Bactericidal activity of glycinecin A, a bacteriocin derived from Xanthomonas campestris pv. glycines, on phytopathogenic Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria cells. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70, 4486– 4490. Pohronezny K and Volin RB, 1983. The effect of bacterial spot on yield and quality of fresh market tomatoes. HortScience, 18, 69– 70. Pohronezny K, Moss MA, Dankers W and Schenk J, 1990. Dispersal and management of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria during thinning of direct-seeded tomato. Plant Disease, 74, 800– 805. Quezado-Duval AM and Camargo LEA, 2004. Raças de Xanthomonas spp. asociadas à mancha-bacteriana em tomate para processamento industrial no Brasil. Horticultura Brasileira, 22, 80– 86. Quezado-Duval AM, Lopes CA, Leite Jr RP, Lima MF and Camargo LEA, 2005. Diversity of Xanthomonas spp. associated with bacterial spot of processing tomatoes in Brazil. Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Tomato Diseases, Orlando, Florida, 21–24 June 2004. Acta Horticulturae, 695, 101– 108. Ravikumar MR and Khan ANA, 2000. Host range studies of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatioria causing bacterial leaf spot of tomato. Karnatka Journal of Agricultural Studies, 13, 1009– 1010. Ritchie DF, 2000. Bacterial spot of pepper and tomato. The plant health instructor. American Phytopthological Society. 6 pp. Available at: www.apsnet.org/edcenter/intropp/lessons/prokaryotes/Pages/Bacterialspot.aspx Ragozzino A, 1968. La scabbia batterica del peperone (Capsicum annuum L.) in Campania. Rivista di Ortoflorofrutticoltura Italiana, 52, 269– 273. Sahin F and Miller SA, 1998. Resistance in Capsicum pubescens to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria pepper Race 6. Plant Disease, 82, 794– 799. Sahin F, 2001. Pepper races 7, 8 and 10 of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria isolated from diseased pepper plants in Turkey. Plant Pathology, 50, 809. Scott JW, Jones JB, Somodi GC and Stall RE, 1995. Screening tomato accessions for resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, race T3. HortScience, 30, 579– 581. Schuster ML and Coyne DP, 1974. Survival mechanisms of phytopathogenic bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 12, 199– 221. Shumbulo A, Gidago G and Handiso S, 2012. Participatory evaluation of seed treatment techniques to improve seed quality and yield in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) at Wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia. Food science and quality management, Vol 7. Available at: www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/FSQM/article/view/2723/2747 Sijam K, Chang CJ and Gitaitis RD, 1991. An agar medium for the isolation and identification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria from seed. Phytopathology, 81, 831– 834. Sijam K, Chang SJ and Gitaitis RD, 1992. A medium differentiating tomato and pepper strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 14, 182– 184. Silva AMS, Carmo MGF, Olivares FO and Pereira AJ, 2002. Termoterapia via calor seco no tratamento de sementes de tomate: eficiência na eradicação de Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria e efeitos sobre as sementes. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 27, 587– 593. Silva DAG, Rocha MC, Carvalho AO, Fernandes MCA and Carmo MGF, 2006. Efeito de produtos quimicos e biologicos sobre a mancha bacteriana, flora microbica no filoplano e produtividade de pimentão. Horticultura Brasileira, 24, 34– 140. Silva DAG, Carvalho AO, Pereira MB, Olivares FL and Carmo MGF, 2013. Transporte de Xanthomonas vesicatoria de sementes para plântulas e mudas de tomate. Horticultura Brasileira, 31, 50– 58. Stall RE, Gottwald TR, Koizumi M and Schaad NC, 1993. Ecology of plant pathogenic xanthomonads. In: Xanthomonas. Eds JG Swings and EL Civerolo. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 265– 299. Stall RE, Beaulieu C, Egel G, Hodge NC, Leite RP, Minsavage GV, Bouzar H, Jones JB, Alvarez AM and Benedict AA, 1994. Two genetically diverse groups of strains are included in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 44, 47– 53. Stall RE, Jones JB and Minsavage GV, 2009. Durability of resistance in tomato and pepper to Xanthomonads causing bacterial spot. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 47, 265– 284. Sutic G, 1957. Bakterioze crvenog patlidzana (Tomato bacteriosis). Posebna Izd. Inst. Zast. Bilja Beograd (Spec. Edit. Inst. Plant Prot. Beograd), 6, 1– 65. English summary: Review of Applied Mycology, 36, 734-735. Timmer LW, Marois JJ and Achor D, 1987. Growth and survival of xanthomonads under conditions nonconducive to disease development. Phytopathology, 77, 1341– 1345. Vauterin L, Hoste B, Kersters K and Swings J, 1995. Reclassification of Xanthomonas. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 30, 472– 489. Wang H, Hutton SF, Robbins MD, Sim S-C, Scott JW, Yang W-C, Jones JB and Francis D, 2011. Molecular mapping of hypersensitive resistance from tomato 'Hawaii 7981' to Xanthomonas perforans race T3. Phytopathology, 101, 1217– 1223. Young JM, Park DC, Shearman HM and Fargier F, 2008. A multilocus sequence analysis of the genus Xanthomonas. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 31, 366– 377. Citing Literature Volume12, Issue6June 20143720 This article also appears in:Pest categorisations ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)